Quoc Dang1, Joshua Simon2, Joe Catino3, Ivan Puente3, Fahim Habib3, Lloyd Zucker4, Marko Bukur3. 1. Department of Surgery, Larkin Community Hospital, South Miami, Florida; Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, Florida. Electronic address: dangq3@gmail.com. 2. Department of Surgery, Larkin Community Hospital, South Miami, Florida; Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, Florida. 3. Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, Florida; Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Broward General Hospital, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. 4. Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, Florida.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In an expanding elderly population, traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a significant cause of death and disability. Guidelines for management of TBI, according to the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF), include intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. Whether ICP monitoring contributes to outcomes in the elderly patients with TBI has not been explored. METHODS: This is a retrospective study extracted from the National Trauma Database 2007-2008 research datasets. Patients were included if aged >55 y and they met BTF indications for ICP monitoring. Patients that had nonsurvivable injuries (any body region, abbreviated injury score = 6), were dead on arrival, had withdrawal of care, or length of stay <48 h were excluded. Outcomes were then stratified based on ICP monitoring. The primary outcomes were inhospital mortality and favorable discharge. Logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of ICP monitoring on outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 4437 patients were included with 11.2% having an ICP monitor placed. Patients requiring an ICP monitor were younger overall, more likely to present hypertensive, had higher injury severity, and more likely to require operative intervention. Median initial Glasgow coma scale (3) was similar between groups. Of those patients with ICP monitoring, overall mortality was significantly higher, and they were less likely to have favorable discharge status. Craniotomy itself was not associated with increased mortality (P = 0.450). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the use of ICP monitoring according to BTF guidelines in elderly TBI patients does not provide outcomes superior to treatment without monitoring. The ideal group to benefit from ICP monitor placement remains to be elucidated.
BACKGROUND: In an expanding elderly population, traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a significant cause of death and disability. Guidelines for management of TBI, according to the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF), include intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. Whether ICP monitoring contributes to outcomes in the elderly patients with TBI has not been explored. METHODS: This is a retrospective study extracted from the National Trauma Database 2007-2008 research datasets. Patients were included if aged >55 y and they met BTF indications for ICP monitoring. Patients that had nonsurvivable injuries (any body region, abbreviated injury score = 6), were dead on arrival, had withdrawal of care, or length of stay <48 h were excluded. Outcomes were then stratified based on ICP monitoring. The primary outcomes were inhospital mortality and favorable discharge. Logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of ICP monitoring on outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 4437 patients were included with 11.2% having an ICP monitor placed. Patients requiring an ICP monitor were younger overall, more likely to present hypertensive, had higher injury severity, and more likely to require operative intervention. Median initial Glasgow coma scale (3) was similar between groups. Of those patients with ICP monitoring, overall mortality was significantly higher, and they were less likely to have favorable discharge status. Craniotomy itself was not associated with increased mortality (P = 0.450). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the use of ICP monitoring according to BTF guidelines in elderly TBI patients does not provide outcomes superior to treatment without monitoring. The ideal group to benefit from ICP monitor placement remains to be elucidated.
Authors: Mira Ghneim; Jennifer Albrecht; Karen Brasel; Ariel Knight; Anna Liveris; Jill Watras; Christopher P Michetti; James Haan; Kelly Lightwine; Robert D Winfield; Sasha D Adams; Jeanette Podbielski; Scott Armen; J Christopher Zacko; Fady S Nasrallah; Kathryn B Schaffer; Julie A Dunn; Brittany Smoot; Thomas J Schroeppel; Zachery Stillman; Zara Cooper; Deborah M Stein Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2021-07-23