Andrea L Hernan1, Sally J Giles2, Jeffrey Fuller3, Julie K Johnson4, Christine Walker5, James A Dunbar6. 1. Greater Green Triangle University Department of Rural Health, Flinders and Deakin University, Warrnambool, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia. 2. NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. 3. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 4. Department of Surgery, Institute for Public Health and Medicine Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 5. Chronic Illness Alliance, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia. 6. Deakin Population Health Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients can have an important role in reducing harm in primary-care settings. Learning from patient experience and feedback could improve patient safety. Evidence that captures patients' views of the various contributory factors to creating safe primary care is largely absent. The aim of this study was to address this evidence gap. METHODS: Four focus groups and eight semistructured interviews were conducted with 34 patients and carers from south-east Australia. Participants were asked to describe their experiences of primary care. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and specific factors that contribute to safety incidents were identified in the analysis using the Yorkshire Contributory Factors Framework (YCFF). Other factors emerging from the data were also ascertained and added to the analytical framework. RESULTS: Thirteen factors that contribute to safety incidents in primary care were ascertained. Five unique factors for the primary-care setting were discovered in conjunction with eight factors present in the YCFF from hospital settings. The five unique primary care contributing factors to safety incidents represented a range of levels within the primary-care system from local working conditions to the upstream organisational level and the external policy context. The 13 factors included communication, access, patient factors, external policy context, dignity and respect, primary-secondary interface, continuity of care, task performance, task characteristics, time in the consultation, safety culture, team factors and the physical environment. DISCUSSION: Patient and carer feedback of this type could help primary-care professionals better understand and identify potential safety concerns and make appropriate service improvements. The comprehensive range of factors identified provides the groundwork for developing tools that systematically capture the multiple contributory factors to patient safety. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND:Patients can have an important role in reducing harm in primary-care settings. Learning from patient experience and feedback could improve patient safety. Evidence that captures patients' views of the various contributory factors to creating safe primary care is largely absent. The aim of this study was to address this evidence gap. METHODS: Four focus groups and eight semistructured interviews were conducted with 34 patients and carers from south-east Australia. Participants were asked to describe their experiences of primary care. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and specific factors that contribute to safety incidents were identified in the analysis using the Yorkshire Contributory Factors Framework (YCFF). Other factors emerging from the data were also ascertained and added to the analytical framework. RESULTS: Thirteen factors that contribute to safety incidents in primary care were ascertained. Five unique factors for the primary-care setting were discovered in conjunction with eight factors present in the YCFF from hospital settings. The five unique primary care contributing factors to safety incidents represented a range of levels within the primary-care system from local working conditions to the upstream organisational level and the external policy context. The 13 factors included communication, access, patient factors, external policy context, dignity and respect, primary-secondary interface, continuity of care, task performance, task characteristics, time in the consultation, safety culture, team factors and the physical environment. DISCUSSION: Patient and carer feedback of this type could help primary-care professionals better understand and identify potential safety concerns and make appropriate service improvements. The comprehensive range of factors identified provides the groundwork for developing tools that systematically capture the multiple contributory factors to patient safety. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Patient safety; Primary care; Qualitative research
Authors: Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Kate S Marsden; Anthony J Avery; Brian G Bell; Umesh T Kadam; David Reeves; Sarah P Slight; Katherine Perryman; Jane Barnett; Ian Litchfield; Sally Thomas; Stephen M Campbell; Lucy Doos; Aneez Esmail; Jose M Valderas Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2017-06-05 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Eirini Oikonomou; Bethan Page; Rebecca Lawton; Jenni Murray; Helen Higham; Charles Vincent Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Andrea L Hernan; Sally J Giles; Hannah Beks; Kevin McNamara; Kate Kloot; Marley J Binder; Vincent Versace Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-06-21 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Susan Jill Stocks; Ailsa Donnelly; Aneez Esmail; Joanne Beresford; Sarah Luty; Richard Deacon; Avril Danczak; Nicola Mann; David Townsend; James Ashley; Carolyn Gamble; Paul Bowie; Stephen M Campbell Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-06-13 Impact factor: 2.692