| Literature DB >> 25972075 |
Stepani Bendel1,2, Dirk Springe3, Adriano Pereira4, Denis Grandgirard5, Stephen L Leib6,7, Alessandro Putzu8, Jannis Schlickeiser9, Stephan M Jakob10, Jukka Takala11, Matthias Haenggi12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Different anesthesia regimes are commonly used in experimental models of cardiac arrest, but the effects of various anesthetics on clinical outcome parameters are unknown. We conducted a study in which we subjected rats to cardiac arrest under medetomidine/ketamine or sevoflurane/fentanyl anesthesia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25972075 PMCID: PMC4429377 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2253-15-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Anesthesiol ISSN: 1471-2253 Impact factor: 2.217
Figure 1Flow chart of the number of animals assigned into the different groups.
Figure 2Mean blood pressure at different time points. Variation of blood pressure is similar in both groups. Data are shown as means and [IQR].
Figure 3Temperature at different time points. Friedmans’s test within each anesthesia group is significant (both p < 0.01), but at no time there is a significant difference between both groups. Data are shown as means and [IQR].
Values of the arterial blood gas analysis 5 and 15 minutes after return of spontaneous circulation (median [IQR])
| Medetomidine/ketamine | Sevoflurane/fentanyl | p between groups Mann–Whitney test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 5 min | 7.03 [IQR 6.93 – 7.09] | 7.03 [IQR 6.95 – 7.15] | p = 0.44 |
| 15 min | 7.31 [IQR 7.24 – 7.34] | 7.21 [IQR 7.07 – 7.32] | ||
| p within groups Wilcoxon test | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | ||
| Base excess | 5 min | -18.2 [IQR -20.1 – -15.6] | -16.3 [IQR -19.1 – -14.3] | p = 0.18 |
| 15 min | -9.6 [IQR -12.0 – -7.6] | -10.0 [IQR -14.4 – -8.1] | ||
| p within groups Wilcoxon test | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | ||
| pCO2 [mmHg] | 5 min | 54.0 [IQR 39.9 – 64.3] | 49.0 [IQR 42.5 – 67.5] | p = 0.83 |
| 15 min | 33.0 [IQR 29.8 – 38.0] | 43.0 [IQR 33.0 – 53.0] | ||
| p within groups Wilcoxon test | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | ||
| pO2 [mmHg] | 5 min | 123 [IQR 113 – 1137] | 110 [IQR 97 – 124] | p = 0.15 |
| 15 min | 141 [IQR 99 – 157] | 92 [IQR 79 – 117] | ||
| p within groups Wilcoxon test | p = 0.39 | p = 0.01* | ||
| Lactate [mmol/l] | 5 min | 8.3 [IQR 6.9 – 10.7] | 7.7 [IQR 7.4 – 9.3] | p = 0.86 |
| 15 min | 4.0 [IQR 3.1 – 6.7] | 4.5 [IQR 3.8 – 4.7] | ||
| p within groups Wilcoxon test | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | ||
| Glucose [mmol/l] | 5 min | 22.6 [IQR 20.4 – 25.3] | 14.9 [IQR 13.3 – 16.4] | p < 0.01* |
| 15 min | 21.9 [IQR 19.6 – 23.7] | 13.1 [IQR 12.2 – 14.5] | p < 0.01* | |
| p within groups Wilcoxon test | p = 0.08 | p = 0.01* | ||
Mixed respiratory and metabolic acidosis are even distributed after cardiac arrest and corrects similarly in both groups. pO2 is lower after 15 minutes in the sev/fnt group (significant decline from the 5 minutes value, compared to the med/ket group. Glucose values are always higher in the med/ket group due to the medetomedine (details see text) * indicate significant differences between the anesthesia groups.
Results of the general health and neurologic tests
| Medetomidine/ketamine | Sevoflurane/fentanyl | p between groups Mann–Whitney test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight [g] | BL | 385 [IQR 357 – 413] | 380 [IQR 360 – 426] | p = 0.89 |
| day 1 | 375 [IQR 353 – 415] | 367 [IQR 343 – 420] | ||
| day 2 | 360 [IQR 322 – 400] | 355 [IQR 342 – 387] | ||
| day 3 | 359 [IQR 322 – 413] | 359 [IQR 348 – 360] | ||
| day 4 | 369 [IQR 320 – 417] | 349 [IQR 343 – 351] | ||
| day 5 | 370 [IQR 325 – 421] | 350 [IQR 319 – 360] | ||
| Friedman & (BL, day 1 and last day, all animals) | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | ||
| Friedman% (day 2–5, only animals surviving all days) | p = 0.14 | p = 0.58 | ||
| NDS | BL | 0 [IQR 0 – 0] | 0 [IQR 0 – 0] | p = 0.34 |
| day 1 | 10 [IQR 5 – 14] | 5 [IQR 3 – 10] | ||
| day 2 | 5 [IQR 0 – 5] | 0 [IQR 0 – 5] | ||
| day 3 | 0 [IQR 0 – 0] | 0 [IQR 0 – 15] | ||
| day 4 | 0 [IQR 0 – 0] | 0 [IQR 0 – 15] | ||
| day 5 | 0 [IQR 0 – 0] | 0 [IQR 0 – 15] | ||
| Friedman & (BL, day 1 and last day, all animals) | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | ||
| Friedman% (day 2–5, only animals surviving all days) | p = 0.93 | p = 0.07 | ||
| OFT [n] | BL | 94 [IQR 75 – 110] | 91 [IQR 64 – 114] | p = 0.89 |
| day 1 | 107 [IQR 26 – 147] | 102 [IQR 52 – 163] | ||
| day 2 | 106 [IQR 55 – 130] | 114 [IQR 81 – 158] | ||
| day 3 | 35 [IQR 17 – 93] | 90 [IQR 63 – 135] | ||
| day 4 | 35 [IQR 9 – 66] | 42 [IQR 13 – 148] | ||
| day 5 | 20 [IQR 11 – 33] | 66 [IQR 23 – 138] | ||
| Friedman & (BL, day 1 and last day, all animals) | p = 0.23 | p = 0.76 | ||
| Friedman% (day 2–5, only animals surviving all days) | p = 0.04 | p = 0.73 | ||
| rears [n] | BL | 23 [IQR 17 – 29] | 19 [IQR 16 – 25] | p = 0.21 |
| day 1 | 2 [IQR 0 – 13] | 5 [IQR 1 – 12] | ||
| day 2 | 12 [IQR 1 – 14] | 11 [IQR 4 – 19] | ||
| day 3 | 7 [IQR 3 – 11] | 6 [IQR 3 – 11] | ||
| day 4 | 6 [IQR 4 – 8] | 5 [IQR 0 – 13] | ||
| day 5 | 5 [IQR 3 – 7] | 4 [IQR 0 – 13] | ||
| Friedman & (BL, day 1 and last day, all animals) | p < 0.01 | p = 0.02 | ||
| Friedman% (day 2–5, only animals surviving all days) | p = 0.21 | p = 0.18 | ||
| VPT | BL | 0 [IQR 0 – 0] | 0 [IQR 0 – 0] | p = 0.70 |
| day 1 | 2 [IQR 1 – 2] | 2 [IQR 2 – 2] | ||
| day 2 | 1 [IQR 1 – 2] | 1 [IQR 1 – 2] | ||
| day 3 | 0 [IQR 0 – 1] | 1 [IQR 1 – 1] | ||
| day 4 | 0 [IQR 0 – 0] | 0 [IQR 0 – 2.0] | ||
| day 5 | 0 [IQR 0 – 1] | 0 [IQR 0 – 1.0] | ||
| Friedman & (BL, day 1 and last day, all animals) | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | ||
| Friedman% (day 2–5, only animals surviving all days) | p = 0.16 | p = 0.43 | ||
| TRT [sec] | BL | 18.5 [IQR 11.5 – 23.5] | 11.0 [IQR 9.5– 19.5] | p = 0.12 |
| day 1 | 120 [IQR 120 – 120] | 120 [IQR 93.5 – 120] | ||
| day 2 | 55.0 [IQR 15.0 – 120] | 48.0 [IQR 29.5 – 120] | ||
| day 3 | 32.0 [IQR 11.8 – 95] | 62.0 [IQR 19.0– 120] | ||
| day 4 | 46.0 [IQR 21.0 – 102.5] | 28.0 [IQR 19.0– 120] | ||
| day 5 | 24.0 [IQR 12.3 – 96.5] | 36.0 [IQR 18.0– 112] | ||
| Friedman & (BL, day 1 and last day, all animals) | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | ||
| Friedman% (day 2–5, only animals surviving all days) | p = 0.65 | p = 0.80 | ||
Friedman test including baseline, first and last day assessments (all animals)&, and including assessment from day 2 to 5, respectively (only animals with longest survival)%. No significant differences could be found between both anesthesia groups at baseline, and global (BL, day 1 and last day) Friedman’s tests (time effect) did not diverge. The only difference found is a reduction in the numbers of squares crossed in the open field test during the recovery phase after day 2 in the med/ket group, compared to the sev/fnt group, in which the animals remained mobile.
NDS: Neuro Deficit Score; OFT: Open Field Test (numbers of squares crossed in the open field); rears: number of rears in the open field; VPT: Vertical Pole Test, TRT: Tape Removal Test.
Results of the histology analysis of the rostral and caudal sections of the CA1 segment of the hippocampus on day 5
| Day 5 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell layer (ratio area/length) | Pyknotic cells % | |||||
| Med/ket | Sev/fnt | p | Med/ket | Sev/fnt | p | |
| CA1 rostral | 0.058 [0.055 – 0.064] | 0.055 [0.030 – 0.065] | 0.65 | 19 [7 – 28] | 85 [60 – 88] | 0.01* |
| CA1 caudal | 0.093 [0.081 – 0.108] | 0.110 [0.090 – 0.110] | 0.32 | 4 [1 – 21] | 33 [27 – 63] | 0.02* |
On day 2, there were virtually no cells with pyknotic nuclei. Data are shown as medians and interquartile range in square brackets [], *denotes significant differences. The “thickness” of the cell layer was normalized as ratio of the area and the length of the examined part (see Methods section).
time course of the decrease of the CA1 cell layer area as a marker of atrophy
| Cell layer (ratio area/length) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Med/ket | Sev/fnt | |||||
| Day 2 | Day 5 | p | Day 2 | Day 5 | p | |
| CA1 rostral | 0.085 [0.070 – 0.090] | 0.058 [0.055 – 0.064] | <0.01* | 0.075 [0.070 – 0.080] | 0.055 [0.030 – 0.065] | <0.01* |
| CA1 caudal | 0.125 [0.120 – 0.135] | 0.093 [0.081 – 0.108] | < 0.01* | 0.120 [0.105 – 0.123] | 0.110 [0.090 – 0.110] | 0.30 |
Data are shown as medians and interquartile range in square brackets [], *denotes significant differences. The “thickness” of the cell layer was normalized as ratio of the area and the length of the examined part (see Methods section).
Figure 4Example of injury to the hippocampus (cresyl violet staining). Left: sham animal, right: 8 minutes cardiac arrest. The 4 different slides of one hemisphere are showing the different sections of the CA1 segment of the hippocampus while moving from rostral to caudal (starting up-left, up-right, down-left and down-right). Delineating the border of the CA1 segments is difficult in the caudal sections because of the curvature of the hippocampus. The inlays demonstrate the shrunken and pyknotic neurons, resulting in a diminished cell layer of CA1 in the cardiac arrest animal (400x). Histomorphometric analysis of the CA1 segment was performed by 1. cell count and 2. automated surface area calculation (details see Methods). The sham animal was operated in the pilot phase, and received complete surgery under sev/fnt anesthesia, but was not subjected to cardiac arrest.