Rine Nakanishi1, Heidi Gransar1, Piotr Slomka1, Reza Arsanjani1, Aryeh Shalev1, Yuka Otaki1, John D Friedman1, Sean W Hayes1, Louise E B Thomson1, Mathews Fish2, Guido Germano1, Aiden Abidov3, Leslee Shaw4, Alan Rozanski5, Daniel S Berman6,7. 1. Departments of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. 2. Oregon Heart and Vascular Institute, Sacred Heart Medical Center, Springfield, OR, USA. 3. Sarver Heart Center, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 5. Division of Cardiology, St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, New York, NY, USA. 6. Departments of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. bermand@cshs.org. 7. Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. bermand@cshs.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While uncommon, normal stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) can be seen in patients with high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD) by invasive coronary angiography (ICA).The predictors of high-risk CAD in patients with normal SPECT-MPI have not been described. METHODS: We studied 580 patients (age 64 ± 12 years, 49% men) without known CAD who underwent stress-gated SPECT-MPI [exercise (41%) or vasodilator (59%)] <2 months before ICA and had summed stress score (SSS) <4. High-risk CAD was defined as 3 vessels with ≥70% stenosis, 2 vessels with ≥70% stenosis including proximal left anterior descending, or left main with ≥50% stenosis. Obstructive non-high-risk CAD was defined by the presence of a ≥70% stenosis but without having other high-risk criteria. Tenfold cross-validated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) estimates were obtained to assess the predictors of high-risk CAD. RESULTS: Forty-two subjects (7.2%) had high-risk CAD and 168 (29.0%) had obstructive non-high-risk CAD. Variables associated with high-risk CAD were pretest probability of CAD ≥66% (Odds ratio [OR] 3.63, 95% CI 1.6-8.3, P = .002), SSS > 0 (OR 7.46, 95% CI 2.6-21.1, P < 0.001), and abnormal TID (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.0-4.5, P = 0.044). When substituted for TID, EF change was also predictive of high-risk CAD (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.9-1.0, P = 0.023). The prevalence of high-risk CAD increased as the number of these predictors increased. In a sub-analysis of patients in whom quantitative total perfusion deficit (TPD) was available, TPD > 0 was also a predictor of high-risk CAD (OR 6.01, 95% CI 1.5-22.2, P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Several clinical, stress, and SPECT-MPI findings are associated high-risk CAD among patients with normal SPECT-MPI. Consideration of these factors may improve the overall assessment of the likelihood of high-risk CAD in patients undergoing stress SPECT-MPI.
BACKGROUND: While uncommon, normal stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) can be seen in patients with high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD) by invasive coronary angiography (ICA).The predictors of high-risk CAD in patients with normal SPECT-MPI have not been described. METHODS: We studied 580 patients (age 64 ± 12 years, 49% men) without known CAD who underwent stress-gated SPECT-MPI [exercise (41%) or vasodilator (59%)] <2 months before ICA and had summed stress score (SSS) <4. High-risk CAD was defined as 3 vessels with ≥70% stenosis, 2 vessels with ≥70% stenosis including proximal left anterior descending, or left main with ≥50% stenosis. Obstructive non-high-risk CAD was defined by the presence of a ≥70% stenosis but without having other high-risk criteria. Tenfold cross-validated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) estimates were obtained to assess the predictors of high-risk CAD. RESULTS: Forty-two subjects (7.2%) had high-risk CAD and 168 (29.0%) had obstructive non-high-risk CAD. Variables associated with high-risk CAD were pretest probability of CAD ≥66% (Odds ratio [OR] 3.63, 95% CI 1.6-8.3, P = .002), SSS > 0 (OR 7.46, 95% CI 2.6-21.1, P < 0.001), and abnormal TID (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.0-4.5, P = 0.044). When substituted for TID, EF change was also predictive of high-risk CAD (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.9-1.0, P = 0.023). The prevalence of high-risk CAD increased as the number of these predictors increased. In a sub-analysis of patients in whom quantitative total perfusion deficit (TPD) was available, TPD > 0 was also a predictor of high-risk CAD (OR 6.01, 95% CI 1.5-22.2, P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Several clinical, stress, and SPECT-MPI findings are associated high-risk CAD among patients with normal SPECT-MPI. Consideration of these factors may improve the overall assessment of the likelihood of high-risk CAD in patients undergoing stress SPECT-MPI.
Entities:
Keywords:
High risk of coronary artery disease; SPECT-MPI; Single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging
Authors: Hidetaka Nishina; Piotr J Slomka; Aiden Abidov; Shunichi Yoda; Cigdem Akincioglu; Xingping Kang; Ishac Cohen; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Narbeh Melikian; Pieter De Bondt; Pim Tonino; Olivier De Winter; Eric Wyffels; Jozef Bartunek; Guy R Heyndrickx; William F Fearon; Nico H J Pijls; William Wijns; Bernard De Bruyne Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Pim A L Tonino; William F Fearon; Bernard De Bruyne; Keith G Oldroyd; Massoud A Leesar; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A Maccarthy; Marcel Van't Veer; Nico H J Pijls Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-06-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Carolina Valdiviezo; Apurva A Motivala; Rory Hachamovitch; Murthy Chamarthy; Pablo C Navarro; Robert J Ostfeld; Mimi Kim; Mark I Travin Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2011-02-15 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: D S Berman; R Hachamovitch; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; F P Wang; J D Friedman; G Germano; K Van Train; G A Diamond Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Ryo Nakazato; Daniel S Berman; Heidi Gransar; Mark Hyun; Romalisa Miranda-Peats; Faith C Kite; Sean W Hayes; Louise E J Thomson; John D Friedman; Alan Rozanski; Piotr J Slomka Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Reza Arsanjani; Yuan Xu; Sean W Hayes; Mathews Fish; Mark Lemley; James Gerlach; Sharmila Dorbala; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano; Piotr Slomka Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-01-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Machiel J M Ottenhof; Marisa C G Tjong Joe Wai; Hendrik J Boiten; Rebecca S Korbee; Roelf Valkema; Ron T van Domburg; Arend F L Schinkel Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2013-08-03 Impact factor: 5.952