Literature DB >> 25971890

National early warning score at Emergency Department triage may allow earlier identification of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective observational study.

J W Keep1, A S Messmer1, R Sladden1, N Burrell1, R Pinate1, M Tunnicliff1, E Glucksman1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Severe sepsis and septic shock (SS) are time-critical medical emergencies that affect millions of people in the world. Earlier administration of antibiotics has been shown to reduce mortality from SS; however, the initiation of early resuscitation requires recognition that a patient may have sepsis. Early warning scores (EWS) are broadly used to detect patient deterioration, but to date have not been evaluated to detect patients at risk for SS. The purpose of our study was to look at the relationship between the initial national EWS (NEWS) in the emergency department (ED) and the diagnosis of SS.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-centre, observational study in the ED of an urban university hospital with an annual attendance of 140,000 patients. We aimed to include 500 consecutive non-trauma adult patients presenting to the ED with Manchester Triage System (MTS) category 1-3. The final diagnosis was taken from either the ED medical records or the hospital discharge summary. For all NEWS, the sensitivity and specificity to detect patients with SS was calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 500 patients were included, 27 patients (5.4%) met the criteria for SS. The area under the curve (AUC) for NEWS to identify patient at risk for SS is 0.89 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.94). A NEWS of 3 or more at ED triage has a sensitivity of 92.6% (95% CI 74.2% to 98.7%) and a specificity of 77% (95% CI 72.8% to 80.6%) to detect patients at risk for SS at ED triage.
CONCLUSIONS: A NEWS of 3 or more at ED triage may be the trigger to systematically screen the patient for SS, which may ultimately lead to early recognition and treatment. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacterial; diagnosis; emergency department management; infection; resuscitation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25971890     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  27 in total

1.  National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) to identify inpatient COVID-19 deterioration: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth F Baker; Aidan T Hanrath; Ina Schim van der Loeff; Lesley J Kay; Jonathan Back; Christopher Ja Duncan
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  'σήψις' yesterday, sepsis nowadays: what's changing?

Authors:  Salvatore Lucio Cutuli; Gennaro De Pascale; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Automating a Manual Sepsis Screening Tool in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

Authors:  Julia K Lloyd; Erin A Ahrens; Donnie Clark; Terri Dachenhaus; Kathryn E Nuss
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 4.  AME evidence series 001-The Society for Translational Medicine: clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and early identification of sepsis in the hospital.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Nathan J Smischney; Haibo Zhang; Sven Van Poucke; Panagiotis Tsirigotis; Jordi Rello; Patrick M Honore; Win Sen Kuan; Juliet June Ray; Jiancang Zhou; You Shang; Yuetian Yu; Christian Jung; Chiara Robba; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Pietro Caironi; David Grimaldi; Stefan Hofer; George Dimopoulos; Marc Leone; Sang-Bum Hong; Mabrouk Bahloul; Laurent Argaud; Won Young Kim; Herbert D Spapen; Jose Rodolfo Rocco
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Identifying Patients With Sepsis on the Hospital Wards.

Authors:  Poushali Bhattacharjee; Dana P Edelson; Matthew M Churpek
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 6.  Systems for recognition and response to deteriorating emergency department patients: a scoping review.

Authors:  Julie Considine; Margaret Fry; Kate Curtis; Ramon Z Shaban
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: research priorities for the administration, epidemiology, scoring and identification of sepsis.

Authors:  Mark E Nunnally; Ricard Ferrer; Greg S Martin; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Flavia R Machado; Daniel De Backer; Craig M Coopersmith; Clifford S Deutschman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2021-07-02

8.  Changes in Emergency Department Performance during Strike of Junior Physicians in Korea.

Authors:  Jeongyong Sim; Yuri Choi; Jinwoo Jeong
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 1.112

9.  NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department.

Authors:  Stine Engebretsen; Stig Tore Bogstrand; Dag Jacobsen; Valeria Vitelli; Rune Rimstad
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2020-08-06

Review 10.  The effectiveness of physiologically based early warning or track and trigger systems after triage in adult patients presenting to emergency departments: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francesca Wuytack; Pauline Meskell; Aislinn Conway; Fiona McDaid; Nancy Santesso; Fergal G Hickey; Paddy Gillespie; Adam J N Raymakers; Valerie Smith; Declan Devane
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.