Literature DB >> 25971858

Concordance of sexual dysfunction and dissatisfaction by self-report and those by partner's perception in young adult couples.

S Gungor1, U Keskin1, M Gülsün2, M Erdem2, S T Ceyhan1, A Ergün1.   

Abstract

We evaluated concordance levels of young adult spouses (N=107 couples, total N=214) with regards to sexual satisfaction by using Golombock-Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS). Each spouse of the couples filled out both female and male forms of the GRISS. Self- and spouse-reported scores were analyzed in terms of inter-rater correlation and agreement. The prevalence of overall sexual dissatisfaction was 10.3% and 26.2% in wives and husbands, respectively. The correlation coefficient (r) between the self-reported overall sexual satisfaction scores and those assessed by the spouses was 0.25 (P=0.014) and 0.04 (P=0.680) for wives and husbands, respectively. The sensitivity for perception of partner's sexual problems ranged 11% to 47%, and the specificity was around 64% to 100%, except for vaginismus, which had a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 25%. The prevalance-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) value for overall sexual dissatisfaction reported by themselves and that assessed by their spouses was 0.68 and 0.16 for the wives and husbands, respectively. For specific female sexual problems, the PABAK value was the highest in female dissatisfaction (0.81) followed by anorgasmia (0.78), female avoidance (0.44), vaginismus (0.44), infrequency (0.33), non-communication (0.14) and female nonsensuality (0.14). For specific male sexual problems, the PABAK value was the highest in male nonsensuality (1.00), followed by male dissatisfaction (0.78), infrequency (0.46), non-communication (0.42), male avoidance (0.36), impotence (0.27) and premature ejaculation (-0.04). Our findings suggested that in this clinical sample the partner's perception of sexual dysfunction and dissatisfaction did not correlate well with the subject's self-reported sexual problems, and generally male sexual problems were less correctly perceived by the partners than were female sexual problems. This result may provide helpful information for clinicians who take care of patients' sexual problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25971858     DOI: 10.1038/ijir.2015.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  16 in total

1.  The prevalence of female sexual dysfunction and potential risk factors that may impair sexual function in Turkish women.

Authors:  Selahittin Cayan; Erdem Akbay; Murat Bozlu; Bülent Canpolat; Deniz Acar; Ercüment Ulusoy
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Mode of delivery and subsequent long-term sexual function of primiparous women.

Authors:  S Gungor; I Baser; S Ceyhan; E Karasahin; C H Acikel
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Partner verification: restoring shattered images of our intimates.

Authors:  C De La Ronde; W B Swann
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-08

4.  Treatment of sexual dysfunction.

Authors:  J LoPiccolo; W E Stock
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1986-04

5.  The Golombok-Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS).

Authors:  J Rust; S Golombok
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1985-02

6.  Does mode of delivery affect sexual functioning of the man partner?

Authors:  Sadettin Gungor; Iskender Baser; Temel Ceyhan; Emre Karasahin; Selim Kilic
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Marital problems and sexual dysfunction: how are they related?

Authors:  J Rust; S Golombok; J Collier
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  The frequency of sexual dysfunctions in male partners of women with vaginismus in a Turkish sample.

Authors:  S Dogan; M Dogan
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 2.896

9.  Distinction between male and female invested partners in sexual disorders.

Authors:  L R Derogatis; J K Meyer; B W Gallant
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  The GRISS: a psychometric instrument for the assessment of sexual dysfunction.

Authors:  J Rust; S Golombok
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1986-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Dimensions of couples' sexual communication, relationship satisfaction, and sexual satisfaction: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Allen B Mallory
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2021-12-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.