Literature DB >> 25971762

Ecology of health care in Canada.

Moira Stewart1, Bridget Ryan2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide a population-based, Canada-wide picture of health care needs and health care use, and present it in a highly accessible manner, allowing provincial comparisons and comparisons with other international jurisdictions.
DESIGN: A comparison of the rates of health care use among jurisdictions, using Canadian-population survey data and health administrative data.
SETTING: Provincial jurisdictions across Canada. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Canadian and provincial rates of ill health (presence of chronic conditions) and health care use (contacts with family physicians, contacts with other specialist physicians, contacts with nurses, and hospitalizations) as monthly rates per 1000 population standardized by age and sex.
RESULTS: The monthly rate per 1000 population of having at least 1 chronic condition ranged from 524 in Quebec to 638 in Nova Scotia; contacts with family physicians ranged from 158 in Quebec to 295 in British Columbia; contacts with other physician specialists ranged from 53 in Saskatchewan to 79 in Ontario; and contacts with nurses ranged from 23 in British Columbia to 41 in Quebec. Hospital stays ranged from 8 to 11 per 1000 people, and rates were similar among the provinces.
CONCLUSION: Recognizing the differences among jurisdictions is critical to informing health care policy across the country. Differences persisted when rates were standardized for different age and sex compositions in the provinces. This article provides a straightforward methodology using publicly available data that can be employed in each province to examine, in the future, the evolution over time of health care use by provincial jurisdictions. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25971762      PMCID: PMC4430063     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  6 in total

1.  The ecology of medical care revisited.

Authors:  L A Green; G E Fryer; B P Yawn; D Lanier; S M Dovey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-06-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The validity of self-reported use of health care across socioeconomic strata: a comparison of survey and registration data.

Authors:  S A Reijneveld; K Stronks
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  The ecology of medical care.

Authors:  K L WHITE; T F WILLIAMS; B G GREENBERG
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1961-11-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Measuring the U.S. health care system: a cross-national comparison.

Authors:  Gerard F Anderson; David A Squires
Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)       Date:  2010-06

Review 5.  Self-reported utilization of health care services: improving measurement and accuracy.

Authors:  Aman Bhandari; Todd Wagner
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.929

6.  Validity of self-reported utilization of physician services: a population study.

Authors:  Wim Peersman; Inge Pasteels; Dirk Cambier; Jan De Maeseneer; Sara Willems
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.367

  6 in total
  20 in total

1.  Making the case for primary care.

Authors:  Francine Lemire
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  [Réfutation : Les lignes directrices en soins primaires devraient-elles être rédigées par des médecins de famille? OUI].

Authors:  G Michael Allan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Rebuttal: Should primary care guidelines be written by family physicians? YES.

Authors:  G Michael Allan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  [Les lignes directrices en soins primaires devraient-elles être rédigées par des médecins de famille? OUI].

Authors:  G Michael Allan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Should primary care guidelines be written by family physicians? YES.

Authors:  G Michael Allan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Making the case for the study of symptoms in family practice.

Authors:  Tom Freeman; Moira Stewart
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  Measuring Electronic Health Record Use in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Michael Z Huang; Candace J Gibson; Amanda L Terry
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.342

8. 

Authors:  Christina Korownyk; James McCormack; Michael R Kolber; Scott Garrison; G Michael Allan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Competing demands and opportunities in primary care.

Authors:  Christina Korownyk; James McCormack; Michael R Kolber; Scott Garrison; G Michael Allan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  What are the most common conditions in primary care? Systematic review.

Authors:  Caitlin R Finley; Derek S Chan; Scott Garrison; Christina Korownyk; Michael R Kolber; Sandra Campbell; Dean T Eurich; Adrienne J Lindblad; Ben Vandermeer; G Michael Allan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.