Literature DB >> 25971738

Use of the NatureServe Climate Change Vulnerability Index as an Assessment Tool for Reptiles and Amphibians: Lessons Learned.

Tracey D Tuberville1, Kimberly M Andrews, Jinelle H Sperry, Andrew M Grosse.   

Abstract

Climate change threatens biodiversity globally, yet it can be challenging to predict which species may be most vulnerable. Given the scope of the problem, it is imperative to rapidly assess vulnerability and identify actions to decrease risk. Although a variety of tools have been developed to assess climate change vulnerability, few have been evaluated with regard to their suitability for certain taxonomic groups. Due to their ectothermic physiology, low vagility, and strong association with temporary wetlands, reptiles and amphibians may be particularly vulnerable relative to other groups. Here, we evaluate use of the NatureServe Climate Change Vulnerability Index (CCVI) to assess a large suite of herpetofauna from the Sand Hills Ecoregion of the southeastern United States. Although data were frequently lacking for certain variables (e.g., phenological response to climate change, genetic variation), sufficient data were available to evaluate all 117 species. Sensitivity analyses indicated that results were highly dependent on size of assessment area and climate scenario selection. In addition, several ecological traits common in, but relatively unique to, herpetofauna are likely to contribute to their vulnerability and need special consideration during the scoring process. Despite some limitations, the NatureServe CCVI was a useful tool for screening large numbers of reptile and amphibian species. We provide general recommendations as to how the CCVI tool's application to herpetofauna can be improved through more specific guidance to the user regarding how to incorporate unique physiological and behavioral traits into scoring existing sensitivity factors and through modification to the assessment tool itself.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25971738     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0537-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  16 in total

1.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems.

Authors:  Camille Parmesan; Gary Yohe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Erosion of lizard diversity by climate change and altered thermal niches.

Authors:  Barry Sinervo; Fausto Méndez-de-la-Cruz; Donald B Miles; Benoit Heulin; Elizabeth Bastiaans; Maricela Villagrán-Santa Cruz; Rafael Lara-Resendiz; Norberto Martínez-Méndez; Martha Lucía Calderón-Espinosa; Rubi Nelsi Meza-Lázaro; Héctor Gadsden; Luciano Javier Avila; Mariana Morando; Ignacio J De la Riva; Pedro Victoriano Sepulveda; Carlos Frederico Duarte Rocha; Nora Ibargüengoytía; César Aguilar Puntriano; Manuel Massot; Virginie Lepetz; Tuula A Oksanen; David G Chapple; Aaron M Bauer; William R Branch; Jean Clobert; Jack W Sites
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Climate change and distribution shifts in marine fishes.

Authors:  Allison L Perry; Paula J Low; Jim R Ellis; John D Reynolds
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The potential for behavioral thermoregulation to buffer "cold-blooded" animals against climate warming.

Authors:  Michael Kearney; Richard Shine; Warren P Porter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Why tropical forest lizards are vulnerable to climate warming.

Authors:  Raymond B Huey; Curtis A Deutsch; Joshua J Tewksbury; Laurie J Vitt; Paul E Hertz; Héctor J Alvarez Pérez; Theodore Garland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species' ranges.

Authors:  Michael Kearney; Warren Porter
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Approaches to evaluating climate change impacts on species: a guide to initiating the adaptation planning process.

Authors:  Erika L Rowland; Jennifer E Davison; Lisa J Graumlich
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Increased temperature variation poses a greater risk to species than climate warming.

Authors:  David A Vasseur; John P DeLong; Benjamin Gilbert; Hamish S Greig; Christopher D G Harley; Kevin S McCann; Van Savage; Tyler D Tunney; Mary I O'Connor
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Towards an integrated framework for assessing the vulnerability of species to climate change.

Authors:  Stephen E Williams; Luke P Shoo; Joanne L Isaac; Ary A Hoffmann; Gary Langham
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Temperature variation makes ectotherms more sensitive to climate change.

Authors:  Krijn P Paaijmans; Rebecca L Heinig; Rebecca A Seliga; Justine I Blanford; Simon Blanford; Courtney C Murdock; Matthew B Thomas
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 10.863

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessing vulnerability of giant pandas to climate change in the Qinling Mountains of China.

Authors:  Jia Li; Fang Liu; Yadong Xue; Yu Zhang; Diqiang Li
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Influence of adaptive capacity on the outcome of climate change vulnerability assessment.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Ofori; Adam J Stow; John B Baumgartner; Linda J Beaumont
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.