Literature DB >> 25971714

Physiological variability in volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath and released from faeces due to nutrition and somatic growth in a standardized caprine animal model.

Sina Fischer1, Phillip Trefz, Andreas Bergmann, Markus Steffens, Mario Ziller, Wolfram Miekisch, Jochen S Schubert, Heike Köhler, Petra Reinhold.   

Abstract

Physiological effects may change volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations and may therefore act as confounding factors in the definition of VOCs as disease biomarkers. To evaluate the extent of physiological background variability, this study assessed the effects of feed composition and somatic growth on VOC patterns in a standardized large animal model. Fifteen clinically healthy goats were followed during their first year of life. VOCs present in the headspace over faeces, exhaled breath and ambient air inside the stable were repeatedly assessed in parallel with the concentrations of glucose, protein, and albumin in venous blood. VOCs were collected and analysed using solid-phase or needle-trap microextraction and gas chromatograpy together with mass spectroscopy. The concentrations of VOCs in exhaled breath and above faeces varied significantly with increasing age of the animals. The largest variations in volatiles detected in the headspace over faeces occurred with the change from milk feeding to plant-based diet. VOCs above faeces and in exhaled breath correlated significantly with blood components. Among VOCs exhaled, the strongest correlations were found between exhaled nonanal concentrations and blood concentrations of glucose and albumin. Results stress the importance of a profound knowledge of the physiological backgrounds of VOC composition before defining reliable and accurate marker sets for diagnostic purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25971714     DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/9/2/027108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breath Res        ISSN: 1752-7155            Impact factor:   3.262


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cattle Tick Rhipicephalus microplus-Host Interface: A Review of Resistant and Susceptible Host Responses.

Authors:  Ala E Tabor; Abid Ali; Gauhar Rehman; Gustavo Rocha Garcia; Amanda Fonseca Zangirolamo; Thiago Malardo; Nicholas N Jonsson
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 2.  A Compendium of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Released By Human Cell Lines.

Authors:  Wojciech Filipiak; Pawel Mochalski; Anna Filipiak; Clemens Ager; Raquel Cumeras; Cristina E Davis; Agapios Agapiou; Karl Unterkofler; Jakob Troppmair
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  A longitudinal study of the faecal microbiome and metabolome of periparturient mares.

Authors:  Shebl E Salem; Rachael Hough; Chris Probert; Thomas W Maddox; Philipp Antczak; Julian M Ketley; Nicola J Williams; Sarah J Stoneham; Debra C Archer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 4.  A Scoping Review on Wearable Devices for Environmental Monitoring and Their Application for Health and Wellness.

Authors:  Sara Bernasconi; Alessandra Angelucci; Andrea Aliverti
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Comparative analysis of volatile organic compounds for the classification and identification of mycobacterial species.

Authors:  Anne Küntzel; Peter Oertel; Sina Fischer; Andreas Bergmann; Phillip Trefz; Jochen Schubert; Wolfram Miekisch; Petra Reinhold; Heike Köhler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sniffer mice discriminate urine odours of patients with bladder cancer: A proof-of-principle study for non-invasive diagnosis of cancer-induced odours.

Authors:  Takaaki Sato; Yoji Katsuoka; Kimihiko Yoneda; Mitsuo Nonomura; Shinya Uchimoto; Reiko Kobayakawa; Ko Kobayakawa; Yoichi Mizutani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Application of Volatile Organic Compound Analysis in a Nutritional Intervention Study: Differential Responses during Five Hours Following Consumption of a High- and a Low-Fat Dairy Drink.

Authors:  Jeske H J Hageman; Arie G Nieuwenhuizen; Saskia M van Ruth; Jos A Hageman; Jaap Keijer
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.914

8.  Detection of Paratuberculosis in Dairy Herds by Analyzing the Scent of Feces, Alveolar Gas, and Stable Air.

Authors:  Michael Weber; Peter Gierschner; Anne Klassen; Elisa Kasbohm; Jochen K Schubert; Wolfram Miekisch; Petra Reinhold; Heike Köhler
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.