Axel Muendlein1, Bettina H Rohde2, Klaus Gasser3, Anton Haid3, Stephanie Rauch3, Elena Kinz1, Heinz Drexel1, Wera Hofmann4, Verena Schindler2, Rita Kapoor2, Thomas Decker5, Alois H Lang6,7. 1. Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment, Feldkirch, Austria. 2. GATC Biotech AG, Constance, Germany. 3. Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria. 4. LifeCodexx AG, Constance, Germany. 5. Onkologie Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany. 6. Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment, Feldkirch, Austria. labor@vivit.at. 7. Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria. labor@vivit.at.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer patients is used to identify the risk of second primary cancers and the risk of cancer in the patients' family. Women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are thought to be more likely to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but most national guidelines for genetic testing, including those used in Germany and Austria, do not consider receptor triple negativity. METHODS: We determined the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations within a cohort of 100 unselected TNBC cases, including patients from Germany and Austria to identify those BRCA-positive patients with a masked family history and who would have been missed due to respective current national guidelines. Double-stranded Sanger sequencing of all exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively, was performed. RESULTS: We identified a total of 13 deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and a total of four deleterious mutations in BRCA2. The total rate of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was 21 % in our cohort. Six novel mutations, including two deleterious mutations, have been identified, which have not been described in public mutation databases so far. According to current German and Austrian national guidelines for genetic testing, 38.1 and 52.4 %, respectively, of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers would have been overlooked. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is high in TNBC patients and that BRCA1/2 mutations are not restricted to young women or patients with a positive family history. Receptor triple negativity should therefore be considered in BRCA1/2 genetic testing guidelines.
PURPOSE: Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancerpatients is used to identify the risk of second primary cancers and the risk of cancer in the patients' family. Women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are thought to be more likely to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but most national guidelines for genetic testing, including those used in Germany and Austria, do not consider receptor triple negativity. METHODS: We determined the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations within a cohort of 100 unselected TNBC cases, including patients from Germany and Austria to identify those BRCA-positive patients with a masked family history and who would have been missed due to respective current national guidelines. Double-stranded Sanger sequencing of all exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively, was performed. RESULTS: We identified a total of 13 deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and a total of four deleterious mutations in BRCA2. The total rate of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was 21 % in our cohort. Six novel mutations, including two deleterious mutations, have been identified, which have not been described in public mutation databases so far. According to current German and Austrian national guidelines for genetic testing, 38.1 and 52.4 %, respectively, of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers would have been overlooked. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is high in TNBC patients and that BRCA1/2 mutations are not restricted to young women or patients with a positive family history. Receptor triple negativity should therefore be considered in BRCA1/2 genetic testing guidelines.
Entities:
Keywords:
BRCA1; BRCA2; Genetic testing; Guidelines; Triple-negative breast cancer
Authors: D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-12-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mary B Daly; Robert Pilarski; Jennifer E Axilbund; Saundra S Buys; Beth Crawford; Susan Friedman; Judy E Garber; Carolyn Horton; Virginia Kaklamani; Catherine Klein; Wendy Kohlmann; Allison Kurian; Jennifer Litton; Lisa Madlensky; P Kelly Marcom; Sofia D Merajver; Kenneth Offit; Tuya Pal; Boris Pasche; Gwen Reiser; Kristen Mahoney Shannon; Elizabeth Swisher; Nicoleta C Voian; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Alison Whelan; Georgia L Wiesner; Mary A Dwyer; Rashmi Kumar Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Vida Stegel; Mateja Krajc; Janez Zgajnar; Erik Teugels; Jacques De Grève; Marko Hočevar; Srdjan Novaković Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 2.103
Authors: J Jung; E Kang; J M Gwak; A N Seo; S Y Park; A S Lee; H Baek; S Chae; E K Kim; S W Kim Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Eli Marie Grindedal; Cecilie Heramb; Inga Karsrud; Sarah Louise Ariansen; Lovise Mæhle; Dag Erik Undlien; Jan Norum; Ellen Schlichting Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Zoe Kemp; Alice Turnbull; Shawn Yost; Sheila Seal; Shazia Mahamdallie; Emma Poyastro-Pearson; Margaret Warren-Perry; Anthony Eccleston; Min-Min Tan; Soo Hwang Teo; Nicholas Turner; Ann Strydom; Angela George; Nazneen Rahman Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-05-03
Authors: Juliane Hoyer; Georgia Vasileiou; Steffen Uebe; Marius Wunderle; Cornelia Kraus; Peter A Fasching; Christian T Thiel; Arndt Hartmann; Matthias W Beckmann; Michael P Lux; André Reis Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 4.430