Literature DB >> 2597096

Cerebral magnetic responses to noise bursts and pauses of different durations.

S L Joutsiniemi1, R Hari, V Vilkman.   

Abstract

We compared magnetic-evoked responses of human auditory cortex to short (5, 10, 20, 40, 80 and 160 ms) noise bursts and to pauses of identical durations in continuous noise. Onsets of both stimuli evoked responses with the most prominent deflection (N100m) peaking at about 100 ms. Both field maps could be explained by current dipoles, which agree with activity at the supratemporal cortex at slightly different locations. At the shortest 5-ms duration the noise bursts evoked a clear N100m whereas pauses elicited very low-amplitude responses or no response at all. For both stimuli, N100m increased in amplitude when the stimulus duration was increased from 5 up to 20-40 ms. The latencies were 10-20 ms longer for pauses than noise bursts with the longest latencies at the shortest stimulus durations. The differences in amplitudes and latencies as a function of stimulus duration and the slightly different source areas indicate that the generators of the on- and off-responses are not identical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2597096     DOI: 10.3109/00206098909081639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiology        ISSN: 0020-6091


  8 in total

1.  Cortical pitch response components index stimulus onset/offset and dynamic features of pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Venkatakrishnan Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Sensitivity of offset and onset cortical auditory evoked potentials to signals in noise.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Curtis J Billings
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Difference in somatosensory evoked fields elicited by mechanical and electrical stimulations: Elucidation of the human homunculus by a noninvasive method.

Authors:  Ken Inoue; Takushi Shirai; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Akira Hashizume; Toshihide Harada; Yasuyo Mimori; Masayasu Matsumoto
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Encoding of frequency-modulation (FM) rates in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Hidehiko Okamoto; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Emphasis of spatial cues in the temporal fine structure during the rising segments of amplitude-modulated sounds.

Authors:  Mathias Dietz; Torsten Marquardt; Nelli H Salminen; David McAlpine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Slow cortical potentials and amplification-part I: n1-p2 measures.

Authors:  Susan Marynewich; Lorienne M Jenstad; David R Stapells
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-18

7.  Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification-Part II: Acoustic Measures.

Authors:  Lorienne M Jenstad; Susan Marynewich; David R Stapells
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-31

8.  Magnetoencephalographic study on forward suppression by ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural maskers.

Authors:  Tadashi Nishimura; Yuka Uratani; Tadao Okayasu; Seiji Nakagawa; Hiroshi Hosoi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.