| Literature DB >> 25970822 |
Wei Xing1, Haoping Wu2, Qiao Shi2, Beibei Hao1, Han Liu1, Zhixiu Wang2, Guihua Liu1.
Abstract
Stoichiometric homeostaEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25970822 PMCID: PMC4429540 DOI: 10.1038/srep10186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The average concentration of 16 tissue elements in submerged macrophytes across 20 Yunnan plateau lakes. These data were log10-transformed and represented as means ± SE. Macroelements were colored green, beneficial elements were colored blue, and microelements were colored purple.
Figure 2Hierarchical clustering analysis of 20 Yunnan plateau lakes based on environmental nutrients (water total nitrogen, water total phosphorus, water total dissolved nitrogen, water total dissolved phosphorus (mg L−1) and sediment total nitrogen, sediment nitrate, sediment ammonia, sediment total phosphorus and sediment dissolved phosphorus (mg kg−1)). This distance is based on the Pearson correlation coefficient.
Figure 3Difference of tissue multielement composition among lake trophic level groups by canonical discriminant analysis (F1: standard canonical function, F2: group centroid function).
Figure 4Differences of tissue multielement composition among submerged macrophytes taxa and Potamogetonaceae taxa by canonical discriminant analysis (F1: standard canonical function, F2: group centroid function). (a) Submerged macrophytes taxa, (b) Potamogetonaceae taxa.
Stoichiometric homeostasis coefficient (1/H X:C) for submerged macrophytes taxa in Yunnan plateau lakes.
| Potamogetonaceae | 0.956 | 1.311 | −4.516 | 1.800 | 14.255 | 2.656 | 3.396 | 1.741 | 1.171 | −0.136 | 1.627 | 2.136 | 1.631 |
| 100* | 100 | 100 | 93 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 70 | 100 | 100 | 83 | 100 | |
| Hydrocharitaceae | 0.797 | 1.307 | −3.465 | 1.841 | −4.640 | 1.069 | 1.943 | 1.749 | 1.285 | −2.088 | 1.681 | 1.925 | 1.661 |
| 25 | 25 | 25 | 24 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 18 | 25 | 25 | 24 | 25 | |
| Haloragaceae | 0.912 | 1.384 | −2.807 | 1.930 | 7.021 | 2.081 | 1.084 | 1.866 | 1.173 | 1.262 | 1.799 | 2.499 | 1.710 |
| 30 | 30 | 30 | 27 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 17 | 30 | 30 | 27 | 30 | |
| Characeae | 1.021 | 1.344 | −1.787 | 1.732 | 29.290 | 4.312 | 1.934 | 1.586 | 1.244 | 1.519 | 1.678 | 1.856 | 1.628 |
| 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 6 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | |
| Ceratophyllaceae | 0.821 | 1.064 | −1.967 | 1.656 | 4.725 | 0.720 | 3.215 | 1.224 | 1.189 | 1.926 | 1.529 | 2.043 | 1.474 |
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10 |
These data were averaged at taxon level.
*number of samples.