Literature DB >> 25970728

A national survey of public views about the classification of obesity as a disease.

Rebecca M Puhl1, Sai Liu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 2013, the American Medical Association classified obesity as a disease. This study assessed public opinions about this disease classification.
METHODS: In January 2014, a national sample of 1118 adults completed surveys assessing their agreement with 33 statements in support of and against the disease classification of obesity, as well as measures assessing sociodemographic characteristics.
RESULTS: The majority of participants (51-61.7%) agreed with 11 of 17 statements in support of the disease classification of obesity (average agreement across all statements = 51%), including views that it will help people gain access to obesity treatment. A minority of participants (31-47.3%) agreed with 15 of 16 statements against the disease classification (average agreement across statements = 39.5%), including views that it will increase overreliance on medications or surgery to treat obesity (47.3%). Participants' attitudes were unaffected by sex, income, education, or health status but were related to causal beliefs about obesity. The disease classification received more support from African Americans and more opposition by individuals with higher weight stigma.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found more public agreement supporting the disease classification of obesity than opposing it. Further work should identify whether this classification affects health behaviors among individuals with obesity or societal weight stigmatization.
© 2015 The Obesity Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25970728     DOI: 10.1002/oby.21068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


  9 in total

Review 1.  The therapeutic potential of metabolic hormones in the treatment of age-related cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  John Grizzanti; Hyoung-Gon Lee; Antoni Camins; Merce Pallas; Gemma Casadesus
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Legislating for weight-based equality: national trends in public support for laws to prohibit weight discrimination.

Authors:  R M Puhl; Y Suh; X Li
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Disrupting Essentialism in Medical Genetics Education.

Authors:  Gareth Gingell; Andrew D Bergemann
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-11-15

4.  Weight Stigma and Disease and Disability Concepts of Obesity: A Survey of the German Population.

Authors:  Anja Hilbert; Markus Zenger; Claudia Luck-Sikorski; Elmar Brähler
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.942

5.  A critical analysis of obesity prevention policies and strategies.

Authors:  Ximena Ramos Salas; Mary Forhan; Timothy Caulfield; Arya M Sharma; Kim Raine
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2017-09-01

Review 6.  Regarding Obesity as a Disease: Evolving Policies and Their Implications.

Authors:  Theodore K Kyle; Emily J Dhurandhar; David B Allison
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.741

7.  COVID-19 stress and eating and drinking behaviors in the United States during the early stages of the pandemic.

Authors:  Jenna R Cummings; Joshua M Ackerman; Julia A Wolfson; Ashley N Gearhardt
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 5.016

Review 8.  Pervasiveness, impact and implications of weight stigma.

Authors:  Adrian Brown; Stuart W Flint; Rachel L Batterham
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-04-21

9.  Does weight-related stigmatisation and discrimination depend on educational attainment and level of income? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marie Bernard; Thomas Fankhänel; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Claudia Luck-Sikorski
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.