Literature DB >> 25970574

Do Adult Medicaid Enrollees Prefer Going to Their Primary Care Provider's Clinic Rather Than Emergency Department (ED) for Low Acuity Conditions?

Roberta Capp1, Meredith Camp-Binford, Sarah Sobolewski, Sandra Bulmer, Lauren Kelley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rates of annual visits for adult Medicaid enrollees to the emergency department (ED) are increasing. Many programs throughout the country are focused on engaging patients in the use of their primary care providers (PCP) rather than the ED for low acuity conditions. It is unclear, however, the proportion of patients who are willing to use primary care services rather than the ED if they are given the choice.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study of adult Medicaid enrollees (18 y and older) presenting to a large, urban, academic ED from June to August 2012 with a low acuity condition was performed. We excluded patients who did not have a PCP or active Medicaid insurance. Our primary goal was to determine the proportion of patients who prefer to use the ED, rather than their PCP clinic, if an appointment was immediately available. Our second goal was to understand why patients would prefer ED over PCP care.
RESULTS: A total of 150 patients agreed to complete the survey, and 95 (63.3%) met our inclusion criteria. Forty-three patients (45.3%) stated preferring to use their PCPs rather than the ED if an appointment was available at that time. Thirteen (48.1%) cited that the ED had more technology or specialty care services available when compared with their PCP's clinic, 8 (15.4%) were in significant pain, and 6 (11.5%) felt the care they received in the ED was better than what they would receive in their PCP clinic.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that a little less than half of adult Medicaid enrollees presenting to the ED with low acuity conditions would have preferred to use their PCP rather than the ED, if an appointment had been immediately available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25970574      PMCID: PMC4435799          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  10 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of clinical case management for ED frequent users: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Martha Shumway; Alicia Boccellari; Kathy O'Brien; Robert L Okin
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  Characteristics of Medicaid enrollees with frequent ED use.

Authors:  Roberta Capp; Marjorie S Rosenthal; Mayur M Desai; Lauren Kelley; Christopher Borgstrom; Darcey L Cobbs-Lomax; Peggy Simonette; Erica S Spatz
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Early experiences with accountable care in Medicaid: special challenges, big opportunities.

Authors:  S Lawrence Kocot; Christine Dang-Vu; Ross White; Mark McClellan
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.459

4.  Emergency department profits are likely to continue as the Affordable Care Act expands coverage.

Authors:  Michael Wilson; David Cutler
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  National study of barriers to timely primary care and emergency department utilization among Medicaid beneficiaries.

Authors:  Paul T Cheung; Jennifer L Wiler; Robert A Lowe; Adit A Ginde
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Dispelling myths about emergency department use: majority of Medicaid visits are for urgent or more serious symptoms.

Authors:  Anna S Sommers; Ellyn R Boukus; Emily Carrier
Journal:  Res Brief       Date:  2012-07

7.  Trends and characteristics of US emergency department visits, 1997-2007.

Authors:  Ning Tang; John Stein; Renee Y Hsia; Judith H Maselli; Ralph Gonzales
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Trends in adult emergency department visits in California by insurance status, 2005-2010.

Authors:  Renee Y Hsia; Julia Brownell; Suzanne Wilson; Nicole Gordon; Laurence C Baker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  National study of health insurance type and reasons for emergency department use.

Authors:  Roberta Capp; Sean P Rooks; Jennifer L Wiler; Richard D Zane; Adit A Ginde
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Dispelling an urban legend: frequent emergency department users have substantial burden of disease.

Authors:  John Billings; Maria C Raven
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.301

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Comparing Emergency Department Use Among Medicaid and Commercial Patients Using All-Payer All-Claims Data.

Authors:  Hyunjee Kim; K John McConnell; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Access to post-acute care services reduces emergency department utilisation among individuals insured by Medicaid: An observational study.

Authors:  Heather Brom; Colleen V Anusiewicz; Idorenyin Udoeyo; Jesse Chittams; J Margo Brooks Carthon
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.036

3.  Exploring the Value Proposition of Primary Care for Safety-Net Patients Who Utilize Emergency Departments to Address Unmet Needs.

Authors:  Kimberly R Enard; Deborah M Ganelin
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2017-07-26

4.  Multimorbidity clustering of the emergency department patient flow: Impact analysis of new unscheduled care clinics.

Authors:  Adrien Wartelle; Farah Mourad-Chehade; Farouk Yalaoui; Hélène Questiaux; Thomas Monneret; Ghislain Soliveau; Jan Chrusciel; Antoine Duclos; David Laplanche; Stéphane Sanchez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.