Literature DB >> 25970225

Bioactivation of clopidogrel and prasugrel: factors determining the stereochemistry of the thiol metabolite double bond.

Patrick M Dansette1, Dan Levent1, Assia Hessani1, Daniel Mansuy1.   

Abstract

The antithrombotics of the tetrahydrothienopyridine series, clopidogrel and prasugrel, are prodrugs that must be metabolized in two steps to become pharmacologically active. The first step is the formation of a thiolactone metabolite. The second step is a further oxidation with the formation of a thiolactone sulfoxide whose hydrolytic opening leads to a sulfenic acid that is eventually reduced into the corresponding active cis thiol. Very few data were available on the formation of the isomer of the active cis thiol having a trans configuration of the double bond, the most striking result in that regard being that both cis and trans thiols were formed upon the metabolism of clopidogrel by human liver microsomes in the presence of glutathione (GSH), whereas only the cis thiol was detected in the sera of patients treated with this drug. This article shows that trans thiols are also formed upon the microsomal metabolism of prasugrel or its thiolactone metabolite in the presence of GSH and that metabolites having the trans configuration of the double bond are only formed when microsomal incubations are done in the presence of thiols, such as GSH, N-acetyl-cysteine, and mercaptoethanol. Intermediate formation of thioesters resulting from the reaction of GSH with the thiolactone sulfoxide metabolite appears to be responsible for trans thiol formation. Addition of human liver cytosol to the microsomal incubations led to a dramatic decrease of the formation of the trans thiol metabolites. These data suggest that cytosolic esterases would accelerate the hydrolytic opening of thiolactone sulfoxide intermediates and disfavor the formation of thioesters resulting from the reaction of these intermediates with GSH that is responsible for trans isomer formation. This would explain why trans thiols have not been detected in the sera of patients treated with clopidogrel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25970225     DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  4 in total

1.  Paraoxonases-1, -2 and -3: What are their functions?

Authors:  Clement E Furlong; Judit Marsillach; Gail P Jarvik; Lucio G Costa
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 5.192

2.  In Vitro Assessment of Potential for CYP-Inhibition-Based Drug-Drug Interaction Between Vonoprazan and Clopidogrel.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Nishihara; Hitomi Yamasaki; Richard Czerniak; Helen Jenkins
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 3.  Update of P2Y receptor pharmacology: IUPHAR Review 27.

Authors:  Kenneth A Jacobson; Esmerilda G Delicado; Christian Gachet; Charles Kennedy; Ivar von Kügelgen; Beibei Li; M Teresa Miras-Portugal; Ivana Novak; Torsten Schöneberg; Raquel Perez-Sen; Doreen Thor; Beili Wu; Zhenlin Yang; Christa E Müller
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 9.473

4.  Inhibitory Effects of Trapping Agents of Sulfur Drug Reactive Intermediates against Major Human Cytochrome P450 Isoforms.

Authors:  Jasleen K Sodhi; Erlie Marie Delarosa; Jason S Halladay; James P Driscoll; Teresa Mulder; Patrick M Dansette; S Cyrus Khojasteh
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.