| Literature DB >> 25969979 |
Lauren Porter1, Jennifer Duke2, Meredith Hennon1, David Dekevich1, Erik Crankshaw2, Ghada Homsi2, Matthew Farrelly2.
Abstract
Recent youth trends in the prevalence of e-cigarette and traditional cigarette use in Florida were examined in a cross-sectional, representative state sample from 2011 to 2014. Traditional cigarette use among youth declined during the study period. Experimentation with and past 30-day use of e-cigarettes among Florida youth tripled over 4 years. Past 30-day e-cigarette use exceeded traditional cigarette use in 2014; 10.8% of high school and 4.0% of middle school students reported recent e-cigarette use, compared with 8.7% of high school and 2.9% of middle school students for traditional cigarettes (P<0.001). By 2014, 20.5% of high school and 8.5% of middle school students reported ever use of e-cigarettes. Among ever e-cigarette users in 2014, 30.3% of high school and 42.2% of middle school students had never smoked traditional cigarettes. Given the concern that significant rates of e-cigarette use by U.S. adolescents may have a negative effect on public health, further review of e-cigarette advertising, marketing, sales, and use among U.S. youth is warranted.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25969979 PMCID: PMC4430226 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124385
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Ever electronic cigarette and traditional cigarette use among middle and high school students, by year—Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 2011–2014.
The largest increase in ever use of electronic cigarettes occurred between 2013 and 2014 for middle and high school students. MS = middle school. HS = high school.
Fig 2Past 30-day electronic cigarette and traditional cigarette use among middle and high school students, by year—Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 2011–2014.
The largest increase in past 30-day use of electronic cigarettes occurred between 2013 and 2014 for middle and high school students. MS = middle school. HS = high school.
Logistic regression models examining change over time in traditional cigarette use and e-cigarette use among Florida youth—Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 2011–2014.
| Ever use traditional cigarettes | Past 30-day use traditional cigarettes | Ever use e-cigarettes | Past 30-day use e-cigarettes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | OR | OR | OR | |
| (95% CI) | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | |
|
| ||||
| Year 2011 |
|
|
|
|
| Year 2012 | 0.88 | 0.99 | 1.30* | 1.20 |
| (0.76–1.02) | (0.81–1.22) | (1.04–1.64) | (0.89–1.61) | |
| Year 2013 | 0.81* | 0.81 | 1.43* | 1.24 |
| (0.67–0.99) | (0.62–1.05) | (1.06–1.93) | (0.86–1.80) | |
| Year 2014 | 0.69 *** | 0.69** | 2.96*** | 2.77*** |
| (0.59–0.80) | (0.55–0.86) | (2.36–3.73) | (2.06–3.71) | |
|
| ||||
| Year 2011 |
|
|
|
|
| Year 2012 | 0.87* | 0.87 | 1.44 *** | 1.14 |
| (0.79–0.97) | (0.75–1.00) | (1.21–1.70) | (0.93–1.41) | |
| Year 2013 | 0.72*** | 0.74** | 2.16*** | 1.79*** |
| (0.63–0.83) | (0.61–0.89) | (1.76–2.65) | (1.40–2.30) | |
| Year 2014 | 0.67*** | 0.63*** | 4.04 *** | 3.79*** |
| (0.60–0.74) | (0.55–0.73) | (3.44–4.76) | (3.09–4.64) |
Current (past 30-day) use of electronic cigarettes and traditional cigarettes among middle and high school students, by demographic characteristics—Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 2014.
| Demographic Characteristic | Sample Size | Electronic Cigarette Use in Past 30 Days | Traditional Cigarette Use in Past 30 Days |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weighted % | Weighted % | ||
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
| 6 | 12,020 | 1.9% | 1.7% |
| 7 | 12,520 | 3.6% | 2.6% |
| 8 | 12,012 | 5.8% | 3.7% |
|
| |||
| Female | 18,430 | 3.6% | 2.8% |
| Male | 17,937 | 4.2% | 3.0% |
|
| |||
| White, non-Hispanic | 17,645 | 4.3% | 3.0% |
| Black, non-Hispanic | 5,930 | 3.1% | 2.6% |
| Hispanic | 8,431 | 4.4% | 3.1% |
| Other race, non-Hispanic | 3,455 | 3.9% | 3.2% |
|
| |||
| Yes | 13,353 | 8.0% | 5.5% |
| No | 18,975 | 1.7% | 1.2% |
|
| |||
| Yes | 4,180 | 16.4% | 8.5% |
| No | 28,004 | 2.3% | 1.9% |
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
| 9 | 9,944 | 8.8% | 6.0% |
| 10 | 8,525 | 10.7% | 7.4% |
| 11 | 7,608 | 11.6% | 8.8% |
| 12 | 6,403 | 11.8% | 11.6% |
|
| |||
| Female | 16,330 | 8.7% | 7.6% |
| Male | 16,084 | 12.6% | 9.4% |
|
| |||
| White, non-Hispanic | 16,853 | 14.2%i | 10.6% |
| Black, non-Hispanic | 5,311 | 4.0%i | 3.6% |
| Hispanic | 7,531 | 11.1%i | 9.0% |
| Other race, non-Hispanic | 2,596 | 11.2%i | 11.2% |
|
| |||
| Yes | 12,951 | 18.6% | 14.4% |
| No | 17,170 | 5.7% | 4.3% |
|
| |||
| Yes | 4,233 | 33.0% | 21.7% |
| No | 25,734 | 7.3% | 6.1% |
a Statistically significant differences between each grade level (P<0.01).
b Statistically significant difference between white, non-Hispanic and black, non-Hispanic and also between black, non-Hispanic and Hispanic (P<0.01). “Other race” category includes Asian, American Indian or Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and Other race.
c Statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Use defined as cigarettes, cigars, chewing tobacco, snuff, dip, or hookah.
d Statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Use defined as electronic cigarettes regardless of other tobacco product use.
e Statistically significant difference between grade 9 and each other grade level (grade 10, grade 11, and grade 12) (P<0.001). No differences between grade 10, grade 11, and grade 12.
f Statistically significant difference (P<0.001).
g Statistically significant difference between all groups (P<0.02), except white, non-Hispanic and Other (not significant).
h Statistically significant differences across all groups (P<0.01), except Hispanics and Other (not significant).