| Literature DB >> 25969834 |
Nasser M Rizk1, Ayman El-Menyar2, Huda Egue1, Idil Souleman Wais1, Hissa Mohamed Baluli1, Khalid Alali1, Fathi Farag3, Noura Younes4, Jassim Al Suwaidi5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several polymorphisms of a locus on chromosome 1p13.3 have a significant effect on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), atherosclerosis, and acute coronary syndrome (ACS).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25969834 PMCID: PMC4370099 DOI: 10.1155/2015/678924
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1The genetic architecture of 1p13.3 and Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) of the rs599839, rs646776, and rs4970834 of on chromosomal location 1p13.3 in ACS patients. Red diamonds represent pairwise LD “EM D′” values between rs4970834 and rs646776 (upper left), rs646776 and rs599839 (upper right), and rs4970834, and rs599839 (lower), respectively.
Frequency of genotypes and alleles among study subjects based upon the significance of coronary artery stenosis stratification in CAD patients.
| SNPs | Genotype |
| Group A | Group B |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs599839 A>G | AA | 107 (48.4) | 48 (56.5) | 59 (43.4) | 3.668 | 0.159 |
| AG | 36 (16.3) | 11 (12.9) | 25 (18.4) | |||
| GG | 78 (35.3) | 26 (30.6) | 52 (38.2) | |||
|
| ||||||
| MAF | G (0.434) | G (0.371) | G (0.474) | 3.682 | 0.032 | |
|
| ||||||
| rs646776 T>C | TT | 170 (76.9) | 73 (80.2) | 97 (72.9) | 1.568 | 0.456 |
| TC | 18 (8.0) | 6 (6.6) | 12 (9.0) | |||
| CC | 36 (16.1) | 12 (13.2) | 24 (18.1) | |||
|
| ||||||
| MAF | C (0.201) | C (0.165) | C (0.236) | 2.119 | 0.146 | |
|
| ||||||
| rs4970834 C>T | CC | 122 (54.2) | 48 (53.9) | 74 (54.4) | 4.147 | 0.125 |
| CT | 40 (17.8) | 11 (12.4) | 29 (21.3) | |||
| TT | 63 (28) | 30 (33.7) | 33 (24.3) | |||
|
| ||||||
| MAF | T (0.369) | T (0.425) | T (0.316) | 0.934 | 0.317 | |
Data are presented by frequency for minor allele [MAF] and P value is significant at >0.05. Frequency of alleles is presented as a percentage. Data were analyzed by chi-square test (2 degrees of freedom) with Bonferroni adjustments. Two-tailed P value is significant at <0.05.
Estimated marginal means (95% CI) of the lipid profile based upon the genotypes of the studied SNPs in all study subjects.
| TC | TG | HDL-C | LDL-C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs599839 A>G-genotypes | ||||
| AA | 5.29 (3.92–6.81) | 3.02 (0.85–6.09) | 1.44 (0.84–1.93) | 3.44 (2.92–3.90) |
| AG+GG | 5.06 (4.21–5.92) | 2.87 (0.75–6.72) | 1.48 (0.99–1.86) | 2.92 (2.27–3.65) |
| GG | 4.13 (3.62–5.05) | 2.68 (0.46–7.58) | 1.58 (0.89–2.72) | 2.58 (2.31–3.39) |
| AA+AG | 4.53 (3.77–5.38) | 3.49 (0.78–7.66) | 1.46 (0.78–1.91) | 2.74 (2.00–3.47) |
| AG | 4.66 (3.17–5.38) | 3.08 (0.79–7.63) | 1.52 (0.78–2.26) | 2.68 (2.21–3.77) |
|
| ||||
| GG vs. | 0.180 | 0.905 | 0.731 | 0.638 |
|
| 0.210 | 0.604 | 0.630 | 0.050 |
|
| 0.041 | 0.628 | 0.751 | 0.026 |
| rs646776 A>G-genotypes | ||||
| TT | 4.62 (4.07–5.35) | 6.69 (0.97–12.47) | 1.15 (0.44–1.85) | 2.93 (2.37–3.47) |
| TC+CC | 4.46 (3.61–5.31) | 2.42 (1.12–6.24) | 2.04 (0.48–2.36) | 2.79 (1.87–3.69) |
| CC | 4.69 (3.38–6.02) | 2.30 (1.34–12.31) | 2.16 (1.54–2.78) | 2.52 (1.73–3.30) |
| TC | 4.52 (3.02–6.04) | 3.54 (0.72–8.09) | 1.44 (1.21–2.77) | 2.53 (1.74–3.33) |
|
| 4.61 (3.37–5.98) | 4.52 (0.88–9.29) | 1.36 (0.95–1.76) | 2.64 (1.98–3.30) |
|
| ||||
|
| 0.590 | 0.250 | 0.041 | 0.272 |
| CC vs. | 0.972 | 0.087 | 0.021 | 0.252 |
|
| 0.906 | 0.018 | 0.004 | 0.427 |
| rs4970834 C>T-genotypes | ||||
| CC | 4.92 (4.12–5.72) | 3.11 (1.18–8.16) | 1.51 (0.94–2.07) | 3.32 (2.48–4.15) |
| CT+TT | 4.39 (3.66–5.13) | 2.78 (1.69–7.69) | 1.44 (1.02–1.87) | 2.99 (2.36–3.63) |
| TT | 4.19 (3.85–5.54) | 2.42 (0.97–6.56) | 1.38 (0.79–1.97) | 2.74 (2.19–3.29) |
| CT | 4.62 (3.45–5.81) | 2.64 (0.77–6.98) | 1.48 (0.92–1.98) | 3.10 (2.45–3.75) |
| CC+CT | 4.75 (3.62–5.87) | 2.87 (1.02–7.15) | 1.46 (0.86–2.01) | 3.01 (2.47–3.73) |
|
| ||||
| CC vs. CT+TT | 0.311 | 0.845 | 0.757 | 0.792 |
| TT vs. | 0.880 | 0.852 | 0.657 | 0.165 |
|
| 0.752 | 0.912 | 0.812 | 0.386 |
Analysis of variance by general linear model with adjusted age, gender, BMI, type 2 diabetes, smoking, hypertension, and lipid-lowering therapy. LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Two-tailed P value is significant at <0.05.
Stepwise regression analysis for LDL-C (dependent) and selected independent variables; age, gender, BMI, diabetes, and antilipidemic treatment (statin) and rs599839, rs646776, and rs4970834.
| Independent variable |
| Standard coefficient | Standard error |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | −0.016 | −0.510 | 0.032 | 0.706 |
| Gender | 0.840 | 0.516 | 1.627 | 0.611 |
| BMI | 0.132 | 2.38 | 0.056 | 0.028 |
| Diabetic state | −0.558 | −0.240 | 0.168 | 0.005 |
| Smoking | 0.038 | 0.062 | 0.617 | 0.951 |
| Statin | 0.570 | 1.146 | 0.497 | 0.266 |
| rs4970834 | 0.337 | 0.493 | 0.684 | 0.627 |
| rs646776 | 0.065 | 0.020 | 0.246 | 0.791 |
| rs599839 | 1.74 | 2.69 | 0.646 | 0.014 |
P < 0.05 is significant for levels of β-coefficient at 2-tailed testing.
Results from logistic regression analysis: associations between determined SNPs and significant coronary stenosis for carriers of the rare allele compared to carriers of the homozygous common allele.
| SNP | Model | OR | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs599839 | Model 1 | 0.59 | 0.34–0.97 | 0.049 |
| Model 2 | 0.56 | 0.32–0.94 | 0.043 | |
| Model 3 | 0.51 | 0.30–0.92 | 0.038 | |
|
| ||||
| rs646776 | Model 1 | 0.62 | 0.27–1.43 | 0.263 |
| Model 2 | 0.55 | 0.21–1.46 | 0.227 | |
| Model 3 | 0.53 | 0.19–1.45 | 0.213 | |
|
| ||||
| rs4970834 | Model 1 | 0.98 | 0.57–1.68 | 0.944 |
| Model 2 | 0.83 | 0.45–1.51 | 0.545 | |
| Model 3 | 0.88 | 0.46–1.70 | 0.705 | |
Three logistic regression models were built: model 1 remained unadjusted, model 2 adjusted for age, gender, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and family history of CAD, and model 3 for the covariates adjusted in model 2 and additionally LDL, HDL, and statin. OR, odds ratio, and CI, confidence interval. Two-tailed P value is significant at <0.05.
Figure 2Logistic regression analysis of the factors involved as confounding factors on the response variable of the significant lesion (≥50%) versus nonsignificant stenosis (<50%) in all ACS patients. Data are presented as odds ratio and 95% CI. Data show the effects of CVD risk factors (genetic variants (in their dominant model)) in interaction with traditional CVD risks including the following variables: old age above 60, male gender, +obesity, +DM, +hypertension, +smoker, +hyper-LDL-C above desirable level, and statin treatment on severity of significant stenosis of the coronaries in the study subjects. Two-tailed P value is significant < 0.05.
Estimated haplotype frequency of the rs599839, rs646776, and rs4970834 polymorphisms in chromosomal locus 1p13.3 and its associations with the severity of coronary artery lesion in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients for significant stenosis versus nonsignificant stenosis outcome.
| rs599839 | rs4970834 | rs646776 | Haplotype |
EM frequency |
EM frequency |
Adjusted OR, |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | G | C | T | T | C | |||||
|
| G | C |
| T | C | ATC | 0.284 | 0.364 | 0.69 | 0.090 |
| A |
| C |
| T | C | GTC | 0.295 | 0.178 | 0.54 | 0.005 |
|
| G |
| T | T |
| ACC | 0.186 | 0.219 | 0.82 | 0.410 |
| A |
|
| T | T |
| GCC | 0.093 | 0.135 | 0.66 | 0.172 |
| A |
|
| T |
| C | GCT | 0.061 | 0.034 | 1.85 | 0.208 |
|
| G | C |
|
| C | ATT | 0.043 | 0.058 | 0.73 | 0.471 |
| A |
| C |
|
| C | GTT | 0.028 | 0.007 | 4.00 | 0.128 |
Data are presented as frequency for severity of coronary artery lesion in CAD patients with significant lesion (≥50%) versus insignificant stenosis (<50%) for each haplotype with the odds ratio, lower and upper 95% confidence intervals, and P value. The data were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. ORs were adjusted for age, gender, BMI, type 2 diabetes, smoking, hypertension, and lipid-lowering therapy. Two-tailed P value is significant <0.05.
Effect of interaction between serum LDL-C and genetic variants at Ip13.3 locus on the risk of significant coronary stenosis in ACS patients.
| SNP | Model | OR | 95% CI | Synergy index ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High LDL | 1.27 | 0.68–1.97 | ||
| rs599839 | AG+GG vs. AA | 0.59 | 0.34–1.02 | |
| Both | 0.87 | 0.36–2.13 | 0.41 (0.15–1.14) | |
|
| ||||
| High LDL | 1.27 | 0.68–1.97 | ||
| rs646776 | TC+CC vs. TT | 0.62 | 0.27–1.43 | |
| Both | 1.01 | 0.26–3.95 | 0.57 (0.21–1.54) | |
|
| ||||
| High LDL | 1.27 | 0.68–1.97 | ||
| rs4970834 | CT+TT vs. CC | 0.98 | 0.57–1.68 | |
| Both | 1.04 | 0.45–2.40 | 0.43 (0.15–1.27) | |
Data are presented by OR and 95 % CI. Both means high LDL and genetic model effect on risk of stenosis, calculated by logistic regression analysis (see stat analysis). Synergy index (S) with 95% CI is biological measure of the interaction between two effects on one biological parameter, and if S below 1 means it is antagonistic and if above 1 suggests synergistic or additive.
| Variables | Group (A) | Group (B) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 56.86 (9.34) | 56.33 (10.59) | 0.701 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 31.69 (6.19) | 30.57 (6.94) | 0.897 |
| Body weight (kg) | 81.85 (26.17) | 80.49 (27.79) | |
| SBP (mmHg) | 129.73 (16.38) | 132.95 (21.84) | 0.290 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 72.42 (10.21) | 72.83 (9.95) | 0.790 |
| Glucose (mM) | 6.94 (5.47–8.41) | 9.49 (8.15–10.83) | 0.003 |
| LDL (mM) | 2.69 (2.42–2.96) | 2.81 (2.59–3.01) | 0.510 |
| HDL (mM) | 1.01 (0.94–1.11) | 0.97 (0.92–1.04) | 0.551 |
| TC (mM) | 4.61 (4.25–4.97) | 4.70 (4.19–5.22) | 0.728 |
| TG (mM) | 2.58 (1.45–3.07) | 1.96 (1.71–2.21) | 0.568 |
| Troponin (ng/mL) | 2.42 (0.01–4.29) | 3.53 (1.01–7.87) | 0.130 |
| CK-MB (ng/mL) | 7.68 (0.75–44.43) | 34.53 (4.63–141.35) | 0.082 |
Continuous data are presented as means (SD) for normally distributed data and mean and lower and upper 95%, CI. Categorical variables were presented as number and percent. BMI: body mass index, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DSB: diastolic blood pressure, TC: total cholesterol, TG: triglycerides, LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, CK-MB: creatinine kinase MB protein. Two-tailed P value is significant at <0.05.
| Variables | Group A | Group B |
|
|
| |||
| CAD risk factors |
|
| |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 68.0 (74.7%) | 110.0 (80.9%) | 0.269 |
| Female | 23.0 (25.3%) | 26.0 (19.1%) | |
| Obesity | 45.0 (49.5%) | 71.0 (52.2%) | 0.736 |
| Hypertension (yes) | 54.0 (59.3%) | 84.0 (61.7%) | 0.842 |
| DM (yes) | 40.0 (43.8%) | 65.0 (62.5%) | 0.008 |
| Dyslipidemia (yes) | 28.0 (33.73%) | 41.0 (32.80%) | 0.885 |
| Smoking (yes) | 30.0 (32.9%) | 63.0 (46.3%) | 0.062 |
| FH of CAD (yes) | 22.0 (24.1%) | 40.0 (29.4%) | 0.465 |
| Use antidiabetic treatment | 26.0 (28.6%) | 40.0 (38.1%) | 0.151 |
| Use statin treatment | 25.0 (34.2%) | 38.0 (36.2%) | 0.224 |
Categorical variables were presented as number and percent. DM: type 2 diabetes, FH of CAD: family history of coronary artery diseases. Two-tailed P value is significant at <0.05.