| Literature DB >> 25969789 |
Nibedita Sarkar1, Kaustav Aikat1.
Abstract
Rice straw is a renewable, cheap, and abundant waste in tropical countries. The pentose content of rice straw can be used as a substrate for many types of value-added products such as xylitol and biofuel. Dilute acid hydrolysis mainly releases pentose from rice straw. The objective of the study was to determine the effect of H2SO4 concentration and reaction time on the xylose production. The variation of the main product xylose with the reaction time was described by a kinetic model and kinetic parameters were calculated to describe the variation of the xylose production with time. The optimum yield (19.35 g/L) was obtained at 0.24 mol/L H2SO4 and 30 minutes.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 25969789 PMCID: PMC4393050 DOI: 10.5402/2013/170615
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Biotechnol ISSN: 2090-9403
Main components of rice straw.
| Components | Percentage of dry weight |
|---|---|
| Cellulose | 40.09 ± 0.02 |
| Hemicellulose | 26.8 ± 0.02 |
| Lignin | 18.9 ± 0.02 |
Xylose (g/L) obtained from the rice straw hydrolysate at various H2SO4 concentrations and reaction times.
| H2SO4 concentration (mol/L) | Time (min) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | |
| 0.093 | 8.7 | 10.5 | 9.13 | 9.08 |
| 0.14 | 11.9 | 13.9 | 12.6 | 12 |
| 0.18 | 15.8 | 18.33 | 16.33 | 15.65 |
| 0.24 | 17.6 | 19.35 | 17.5 | 16.2 |
| 0.28 | 17.31 | 17.99 | 14.45 | 13.18 |
Figure 1Experimental and predicted dependence of xylose concentration on time of various H2SO4 concentrations. (—) Saeman's model, (●) 0.093 mol/L, (▪) 0.14 mol/L, (▲) 0.18 mol/L, (▼) 0.24 mol/L, and (◆) 0.28 mol/L.
Kinetic parameters of xylose released from rice straw through H2SO4 hydrolysis.
| H2SO4 concentration (mol/L) |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.093 | 0.528 | 9.4 | 6 | 0.993 |
| 0.14 | 0.714 | 9.6 | 6.8 | 0.998 |
| 0.18 | 0.936 | 9.9 | 7 | 0.9973 |
| 0.24 | 0.995 | 11.1 | 7.2 | 0.999 |
| 0.28 | 0.999 | 12 | 11.1 | 0.9958 |
Chi-square analysis (χ 2) at each acid concentration.
| H2SO4 concentration (mol/L) |
|
|---|---|
| 0.093 | 0.067 |
| 0.14 | 0.018 |
| 0.18 | 0.035 |
| 0.24 | 0.0084 |
| 0.28 | 0.087 |
Figure 2A plot of αP 0(k 1/(k 2 − k 1)) (−k 1 e − + k 2 e −) (denoted by “A”) versus C (acid concentration).