Literature DB >> 25969540

Reassessing noninducibility as ablation endpoint of post-infarction ventricular tachycardia: the impact of left ventricular function.

Marta de Riva1, Sebastiaan R D Piers1, Gijs F L Kapel1, Masaya Watanabe1, Jeroen Venlet1, Serge A Trines1, Martin J Schalij1, Katja Zeppenfeld2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Noninducibility is frequently used as procedural end point of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation after myocardial infarction. We investigated the influence of left ventricular (LV) function on the predictive value of noninducibility for VT recurrence and cardiac mortality. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Ninety-one patients (82 men, 67±10 years) with post-myocardial infarction VT underwent ablation between 2009 and 2012. Fifty-nine (65%) had an LV ejection fraction (EF) >30% (mean 41±7) and 32 (35%) an LVEF≤30% (mean 20±5). Thirty patients (51%) with EF>30% and 13 (41%) with EF≤30% were noninducible after ablation (P=0.386). During a median follow-up of 23 (Q1-Q3 16-36) months, 35 patients (38%) experienced VT recurrences and 17 (18%) cardiac death. At 1 year follow-up, survival free from VT recurrence and cardiac death for patients with LVEF>30% was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70-90) compared with 42% (95% CI, 33-51) for those with LVEF≤30% (P=0.001). Noninducible patients with LVEF>30% had a recurrence-free survival from cardiac death of 90% (95% CI, 71-100) compared with 65% (95% CI, 47-83) for inducible patients (P=0.015). In the subgroup of patients with LVEF≤30%, the survival free from VT recurrence and cardiac death was 31% (95% CI, 0%-60%) for noninducible compared with 39% (95% CI, 27-52) for those who remained inducible (P=0.842).
CONCLUSIONS: Noninducible patients with moderately depressed LV function have a favorable outcome compared with patients who remained inducible after ablation. On the contrary, patients with severely depressed LV function have a poor prognosis independent of the acute procedural outcome.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  catheter ablation; myocardial infarction; noninducibility; ventricular function; ventricular tachycardia

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25969540     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  8 in total

1.  2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Prediction and prognosis of ventricular tachycardia recurrence after catheter ablation with remote magnetic navigation for electrical storm in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Qi Jin; Peter Karl Jacobsen; Steen Pehrson; Xu Chen
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Meaning of Ventricular Arrhythmia Burden Reduction as a Marker of Ablation Success.

Authors:  Namsik Yoon
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 3.243

5.  The prognostic value of J-wave pattern for recurrence of ventricular tachycardia after catheter ablation in patients with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Naruse; Marta de Riva; Masaya Watanabe; Adrianus P Wijnmaalen; Jeroen Venlet; Marnix Timmer; Martin J Schalij; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Ventricular Arrhythmia in Elderly Patients with Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Ying Dong; Yajun Shi; Jinli Wang; Qing Dan; Ling Gao; Chenghui Zhao; Yang Mu; Miao Liu; Chengliang Yin; Rilige Wu; Yuqi Liu; Yang Li; Xueping Wang
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 1.866

7.  Complete Electroanatomic Imaging of the Diastolic Pathway Is Associated With Improved Freedom From Ventricular Tachycardia Recurrence.

Authors:  Alexios Hadjis; Antonio Frontera; Luca Rosario Limite; Caterina Bisceglia; Ludovica Bognoni; Luca Foppoli; Felicia Lipartiti; Gabriele Paglino; Andrea Radinovic; Georgio Tsitsinakis; Federico Calore; Paolo Della Bella
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-07-28

8.  Pre-procedural image-guided versus non-image-guided ventricular tachycardia ablation-a review.

Authors:  A A Hendriks; Z Kis; M Glisic; W M Bramer; T Szili-Torok
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.380

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.