Literature DB >> 25969535

Tryptophan Scanning Reveals Dense Packing of Connexin Transmembrane Domains in Gap Junction Channels Composed of Connexin32.

Matthew J Brennan1, Jennifer Karcz1, Nicholas R Vaughn1, Yvonne Woolwine-Cunningham2, Adam D DePriest3, Yerko Escalona4, Tomas Perez-Acle4, I Martha Skerrett5.   

Abstract

Tryptophan was substituted for residues in all four transmembrane domains of connexin32. Function was assayed using dual cell two-electrode voltage clamp after expression in Xenopus oocytes. Tryptophan substitution was poorly tolerated in all domains, with the greatest impact in TM1 and TM4. For instance, in TM1, 15 substitutions were made, six abolished coupling and five others significantly reduced function. Only TM2 and TM3 included a distinct helical face that lacked sensitivity to tryptophan substitution. Results were visualized on a comparative model of Cx32 hemichannel. In this model, a region midway through the membrane appears highly sensitive to tryptophan substitution and includes residues Arg-32, Ile-33, Met-34, and Val-35. In the modeled channel, pore-facing regions of TM1 and TM2 were highly sensitive to tryptophan substitution, whereas the lipid-facing regions of TM3 and TM4 were variably tolerant. Residues facing a putative intracellular water pocket (the IC pocket) were also highly sensitive to tryptophan substitution. Although future studies will be required to separate trafficking-defective mutants from those that alter channel function, a subset of interactions important for voltage gating was identified. Interactions important for voltage gating occurred mainly in the mid-region of the channel and focused on TM1. To determine whether results could be extrapolated to other connexins, TM1 of Cx43 was scanned revealing similar but not identical sensitivity to TM1 of Cx32.
© 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cx32; TM domain interactions; comparative model; connexin; gap junction; gating; hemichannel; mutagenesis; transmembrane domain; tryptophan scanning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25969535      PMCID: PMC4498046          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M115.650747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  42 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Applying the Xenopus oocyte expression system to the analysis of gap junction proteins.

Authors:  I M Skerrett; M Merritt; L Zhou; H Zhu; F Cao; J F Smith; B J Nicholson
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2001

Review 3.  Oligomerization of dopamine and serotonin receptors.

Authors:  S P Lee; Z Xie; G Varghese; T Nguyen; B F O'Dowd; S R George
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 4.  Structural and functional diversity of connexin genes in the mouse and human genome.

Authors:  Klaus Willecke; Jürgen Eiberger; Joachim Degen; Dominik Eckardt; Alessandro Romualdi; Martin Güldenagel; Urban Deutsch; Goran Söhl
Journal:  Biol Chem       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.915

5.  Cytoplasmic amino acids within the membrane interface region influence connexin oligomerization.

Authors:  Tekla D Smith; Aditi Mohankumar; Peter J Minogue; Eric C Beyer; Viviana M Berthoud; Michael Koval
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  Site-directed mutagenesis reveals putative regions of protein interaction within the transmembrane domains of connexins.

Authors:  M M Toloue; Y Woolwine; J A Karcz; E M Kasperek; B J Nicholson; I M Skerrett
Journal:  Cell Commun Adhes       Date:  2008-05

7.  Effects of aromatic residues at the ends of transmembrane alpha-helices on helix interactions with lipid bilayers.

Authors:  S Mall; R Broadbridge; R P Sharma; A G Lee; J M East
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 8.  The gap junction communication channel.

Authors:  N M Kumar; N B Gilula
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-02-09       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Tryptophan scanning mutagenesis of the HERG K+ channel: the S4 domain is loosely packed and likely to be lipid exposed.

Authors:  Rajesh N Subbiah; Mari Kondo; Terence J Campbell; Jamie I Vandenberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Molecular dynamics simulations highlight structural and functional alterations in deafness-related M34T mutation of connexin 26.

Authors:  Francesco Zonta; Damiano Buratto; Chiara Cassini; Mario Bortolozzi; Fabio Mammano
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Gap junction gene and protein families: Connexins, innexins, and pannexins.

Authors:  Eric C Beyer; Viviana M Berthoud
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 2.  Gap junction structure: unraveled, but not fully revealed.

Authors:  Eric C Beyer; Viviana M Berthoud
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-04-26

Review 3.  A structural and functional comparison of gap junction channels composed of connexins and innexins.

Authors:  I Martha Skerrett; Jamal B Williams
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.964

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.