Literature DB >> 25969441

The Lethality Screen: The Predictive Validity of an Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment for Use by First Responders.

Jill Theresa Messing1, Jacquelyn Campbell2, Janet Sullivan Wilson3, Sheryll Brown4, Beverly Patchell5.   

Abstract

This research is an examination of the predictive validity of the Lethality Screen, a tool used in conjunction with the Lethality Assessment Program (LAP). This intimate partner violence (IPV) risk assessment is an 11-item version of the Danger Assessment (DA) that was designed to be user-friendly for first responders and to maximize sensitivity. Participants ( N = 254) were recruited into the study at the scene of police-involved IPV incidents in one Southwestern state and subsequently participated in two structured telephone interviews approximately 7 months apart. These analyses provide evidence that the Lethality Screen has considerable sensitivity (92%-93%) and a high negative predictive value (93%-96%) for near lethal and severe violence. However, specificity was low (21%). The Lethality Screen also has good agreement with the DA and IPV survivors' perception of risk. The high sensitivity and low specificity should be considered carefully when determining whether the Lethality Screen is appropriate for particular areas of practice with IPV survivors and/or perpetrators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lethality Assessment Program; domestic violence; predictive validity; risk assessment

Year:  2016        PMID: 25969441     DOI: 10.1177/0886260515585540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interpers Violence        ISSN: 0886-2605


  8 in total

1.  An Integrated Public Health Approach to Interpersonal Violence and Suicide Prevention and Response.

Authors:  Michele R Decker; Holly C Wilcox; Charvonne N Holliday; Daniel W Webster
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Suicide and Additional Homicides Associated with Intimate Partner Homicide: North Carolina 2004-2013.

Authors:  Sierra Smucker; Rose E Kerber; Philip J Cook
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Prosecutorial decision-making regarding offenders' social reintegration programs in intimate partner violence cases. A Portuguese study.

Authors:  Paulo Vieira-Pinto; José Ignacio Muñoz-Barús; Tiago Taveira-Gomes; Maria João Vidal-Alves; Teresa Magalhães
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Risk Assessment Instruments for Intimate Partner Femicide: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Esperanza Garcia-Vergara; Nerea Almeda; Francisco Fernández-Navarro; David Becerra-Alonso
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-31

5.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Police Reporting for Partner Violence in the National Crime Victimization Survey and Survivor-Led Interpretation.

Authors:  Charvonne N Holliday; Geoffrey Kahn; Roland J Thorpe; Roma Shah; Zaynab Hameeduddin; Michele R Decker
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2019-12-11

6.  United States ED Visits by Adult Women for Nonfatal Intimate Partner Strangulation, 2006 to 2014: Prevalence and Associated Characteristics.

Authors:  Michelle Patch; Youssef M K Farag; Jocelyn C Anderson; Nancy Perrin; Gabor Kelen; Jacquelyn C Campbell
Journal:  J Emerg Nurs       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  A Comprehensive Analysis of Factors Associated with Intimate Partner Femicide: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Esperanza Garcia-Vergara; Nerea Almeda; Blanca Martín Ríos; David Becerra-Alonso; Francisco Fernández-Navarro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Racial and Ethnic Differences in Homicides of Adult Women and the Role of Intimate Partner Violence - United States, 2003-2014.

Authors:  Emiko Petrosky; Janet M Blair; Carter J Betz; Katherine A Fowler; Shane P D Jack; Bridget H Lyons
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 17.586

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.