Literature DB >> 25969141

The joint effect of mesoscale and microscale roughness on perceived gloss.

Lin Qi1, Mike J Chantler2, J Paul Siebert3, Junyu Dong4.   

Abstract

Computer simulated stimuli can provide a flexible method for creating artificial scenes in the study of visual perception of material surface properties. Previous work based on this approach reported that the properties of surface roughness and glossiness are mutually interdependent and therefore, perception of one affects the perception of the other. In this case roughness was limited to a surface property termed bumpiness. This paper reports a study into how perceived gloss varies with two model parameters related to surface roughness in computer simulations: the mesoscale roughness parameter in a surface geometry model and the microscale roughness parameter in a surface reflectance model. We used a real-world environment map to provide complex illumination and a physically-based path tracer for rendering the stimuli. Eight observers took part in a 2AFC experiment, and the results were tested against conjoint measurement models. We found that although both of the above roughness parameters significantly affect perceived gloss, the additive model does not adequately describe their mutually interactive and nonlinear influence, which is at variance with previous findings. We investigated five image properties used to quantify specular highlights, and found that perceived gloss is well predicted using a linear model. Our findings provide computational support to the 'statistical appearance models' proposed recently for material perception.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Conjoint measurement; Mesoscale roughness; Microscale roughness; Perceived gloss; Rough surfaces

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25969141     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  A Glossy Simultaneous Contrast: Conjoint Measurements of Gloss and Lightness.

Authors:  Sabrina Hansmann-Roth; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-01-01

2.  Increasing the Complexity of the Illumination May Reduce Gloss Constancy.

Authors:  Gunnar Wendt; Franz Faul
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-12-09

3.  Can Color and Motion Information Be Used to Disentangle the Influence of Multiple Light Sources on Gloss Perception?

Authors:  Gunnar Wendt; Franz Faul
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-10-10

4.  The relative contribution of color and material in object selection.

Authors:  Ana Radonjić; Nicolas P Cottaris; David H Brainard
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Visual perception of texture regularity: Conjoint measurements and a wavelet response-distribution model.

Authors:  Hua-Chun Sun; David St-Amand; Curtis L Baker; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  How facial aging affects perceived gender: Insights from maximum likelihood conjoint measurement.

Authors:  Daniel Fitousi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Morphological stabilization and KPZ scaling by electrochemically induced co-deposition of nanostructured NiW alloy films.

Authors:  P A Orrillo; S N Santalla; R Cuerno; L Vázquez; S B Ribotta; L M Gassa; F J Mompean; R C Salvarezza; M E Vela
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effects of Shape, Roughness and Gloss on the Perceived Reflectance of Colored Surfaces.

Authors:  Vanessa Honson; Quan Huynh-Thu; Matthew Arnison; David Monaghan; Zoey J Isherwood; Juno Kim
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.