Wisit Cheungpasitporn1, Charat Thongprayoon1, Wonngarm Kittanamongkolchai1, Narat Srivali2, Oisin A O'Corragain3, Peter J Edmonds4, Supawat Ratanapo5, Ittikorn Spanuchart6, Stephen B Erickson1. 1. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 2. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. 4. Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA. 5. Division of Cardiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia, USA. 6. Department of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Abstract
AIM: The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on acute kidney injury (AKI) and the need of dialysis after surgery. METHODS: Comprehensive literature searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CABG with on-pump and off-pump was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Systematic Reviews and clinicaltrials.gov from inception through September 2014. Primary outcomes were the incidence of AKI and the need of dialysis. Mortality was assessed among the studies that reported renal outcomes. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method. RESULTS: Thirty-three RCTs with 17 322 patients were enrolled in our study. Patients in the off-pump CABG group had overall lower incidence of AKI (19.1%) compared with the on-pump CABG group (22.2%). There was a protective effect of off-pump CABG on the incidence of AKI compared with the on-pump CABG group (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.77-0.98). However, there was no significant difference in the need for dialysis in the off-pump group compared with the on-pump group (RR: 0.84; 95% CI 0.63-1.13). Within the selected trials, post hoc analysis assessing the mortality outcome demonstrated a pooled RR of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.77-1.23) in off-pump versus on-pump CABGs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates a beneficial effect of off-pump CABG on the incidence of AKI. However, our meta-analysis does not show benefits of the need of dialysis or survival among patients undergoing off-pump CABG.
AIM: The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on acute kidney injury (AKI) and the need of dialysis after surgery. METHODS: Comprehensive literature searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CABG with on-pump and off-pump was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Systematic Reviews and clinicaltrials.gov from inception through September 2014. Primary outcomes were the incidence of AKI and the need of dialysis. Mortality was assessed among the studies that reported renal outcomes. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method. RESULTS: Thirty-three RCTs with 17 322 patients were enrolled in our study. Patients in the off-pump CABG group had overall lower incidence of AKI (19.1%) compared with the on-pump CABG group (22.2%). There was a protective effect of off-pump CABG on the incidence of AKI compared with the on-pump CABG group (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.77-0.98). However, there was no significant difference in the need for dialysis in the off-pump group compared with the on-pump group (RR: 0.84; 95% CI 0.63-1.13). Within the selected trials, post hoc analysis assessing the mortality outcome demonstrated a pooled RR of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.77-1.23) in off-pump versus on-pump CABGs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates a beneficial effect of off-pump CABG on the incidence of AKI. However, our meta-analysis does not show benefits of the need of dialysis or survival among patients undergoing off-pump CABG.
Authors: Jason B O'Neal; Frederic T Billings; Xulei Liu; Matthew S Shotwell; Yafen Liang; Ashish S Shah; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Jonathan P Wanderer; Andrew D Shaw Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 5.063
Authors: Umberto Benedetto; Gianni D Angelini; Massimo Caputo; Dmitriy N Feldman; Luke K Kim; Christopher Lau; Antonino Di Franco; Leonard N Girardi; Mario Gaudino Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Mitra K Nadim; Lui G Forni; Azra Bihorac; Charles Hobson; Jay L Koyner; Andrew Shaw; George J Arnaoutakis; Xiaoqiang Ding; Daniel T Engelman; Hrvoje Gasparovic; Vladimir Gasparovic; Charles A Herzog; Kianoush Kashani; Nevin Katz; Kathleen D Liu; Ravindra L Mehta; Marlies Ostermann; Neesh Pannu; Peter Pickkers; Susanna Price; Zaccaria Ricci; Jeffrey B Rich; Lokeswara R Sajja; Fred A Weaver; Alexander Zarbock; Claudio Ronco; John A Kellum Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Hongran Moon; Yeonhee Lee; Sejoong Kim; Dong Ki Kim; Ho Jun Chin; Kwon Wook Joo; Yon Su Kim; Ki Young Na; Seung Seok Han Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 2.153