Literature DB >> 25968881

Coupling the Biophysical and Social Dimensions of Wildfire Risk to Improve Wildfire Mitigation Planning.

Alan A Ager1, Jeffrey D Kline2, A Paige Fischer3.   

Abstract

We describe recent advances in biophysical and social aspects of risk and their potential combined contribution to improve mitigation planning on fire-prone landscapes. The methods and tools provide an improved method for defining the spatial extent of wildfire risk to communities compared to current planning processes. They also propose an expanded role for social science to improve understanding of community-wide risk perceptions and to predict property owners' capacities and willingness to mitigate risk by treating hazardous fuels and reducing the susceptibility of dwellings. In particular, we identify spatial scale mismatches in wildfire mitigation planning and their potential adverse impact on risk mitigation goals. Studies in other fire-prone regions suggest that these scale mismatches are widespread and contribute to continued wildfire dwelling losses. We discuss how risk perceptions and behavior contribute to scale mismatches and how they can be minimized through integrated analyses of landscape wildfire transmission and social factors that describe the potential for collaboration among landowners and land management agencies. These concepts are then used to outline an integrated socioecological planning framework to identify optimal strategies for local community risk mitigation and improve landscape-scale prioritization of fuel management investments by government entities.
© 2015 Society for Risk Analysis.

Keywords:  Community wildfire protection; socioecological planning; wildfire risk mitigation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25968881     DOI: 10.1111/risa.12373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  7 in total

1.  Evaluating the Characteristics of Social Vulnerability to Wildfire: Demographics, Perceptions, and Parcel Characteristics.

Authors:  Travis B Paveglio; Tony Prato; Catrin Edgeley; Darek Nalle
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Using community archetypes to better understand differential community adaptation to wildfire risk.

Authors:  Matthew Carroll; Travis Paveglio
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The Effect of Mass Evacuation on Infant Feeding: The Case of the 2016 Fort McMurray Wildfire.

Authors:  Sarah E DeYoung; Jodine Chase; Michelle Pensa Branco; Benjamin Park
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-12

4.  Locating Forest Management Units Using Remote Sensing and Geostatistical Tools in North-Central Washington, USA.

Authors:  Palaiologos Palaiologou; Maureen Essen; John Hogland; Kostas Kalabokidis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Democratizing wildfire strategies. Do you realize what it means? Insights from a participatory process in the Montseny region (Catalonia, Spain).

Authors:  Iago Otero; Marc Castellnou; Itziar González; Etel Arilla; Llorenç Castell; Jordi Castellví; Francesc Sánchez; Jonas Ø Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Wildfire policy and management in England: an evolving response from Fire and Rescue Services, forestry and cross-sector groups.

Authors:  Rob Gazzard; Julia McMorrow; Jonathan Aylen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Network analysis of wildfire transmission and implications for risk governance.

Authors:  Alan A Ager; Cody R Evers; Michelle A Day; Haiganoush K Preisler; Ana M G Barros; Max Nielsen-Pincus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.