Christian Chabannon1,2,3, Fontanet Bijou4,5, Jean-Michel Miclea6, Noel Milpied7, Jean-Marie Grouin8,9, Mohamad Mohty10,11,12. 1. Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer. 2. Université d'Aix-Marseille. 3. Inserm CBT 1409, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques en Biothérapie, Marseille, France. 4. Etablissement Français du Sang Aquitaine. 5. CNRS UMR 5164, CIRID, "Composantes Innées de la Réponse Immunitaire et de la Différenciation,", Bordeaux, France. 6. Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France. 7. Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. 8. Inserm U657 "Pharmaco-Épidémiologie et Évaluation de l'Impact des Produits de Santé sur les Populations" 9. Université de Rouen, Rouen, France. 10. Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP). 11. Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC). 12. INSERM, UMRs 938, Centre de Recherches Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy supported with autologous stem cell transplantation is a standard therapeutic option for a subset of patients with lymphoid malignancies. Cell procurement is nowadays done almost exclusively through cytapheresis, after mobilization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) from the marrow to peripheral blood (PB). The egress of HSPCs out of hematopoietic niches occurs in various physiologic or nonhomeostatic situations; pharmacologic approaches include the administration of acutely myelosuppressive agents or hematopoietic growth factors such as recombinant human granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF). The introduction of plerixafor, a first-of-its-class molecule that reversibly inhibits the interaction between the chemokine CXCL-12 (also known as SDF-1) and its receptor CXCR-4, has offered new opportunities for the so-called "poor mobilizers" who achieve insufficient mobilization and/or collection with conventional approaches. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Because of the lack of consensus on a definition for poor mobilizers and the relatively high cost of plerixafor, French competent authorities have mandated a postmarketing survey on its use in routine practice. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We report here the results of this nationwide survey that confirms the clinical efficacy of plerixafor, even in the subset of patients who barely increased PB CD34+ cell count in response to rHuG-CSF-containing mobilization regimen. Furthermore, analysis of this registry showed that despite heterogeneity in medical practices, the early-"on-demand" or "preemptive"-introduction of plerixafor was widely used and did not result in an excess of prescriptions, beyond its expected use at the time when marketing authorization was granted.
BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy supported with autologous stem cell transplantation is a standard therapeutic option for a subset of patients with lymphoid malignancies. Cell procurement is nowadays done almost exclusively through cytapheresis, after mobilization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) from the marrow to peripheral blood (PB). The egress of HSPCs out of hematopoietic niches occurs in various physiologic or nonhomeostatic situations; pharmacologic approaches include the administration of acutely myelosuppressive agents or hematopoietic growth factors such as recombinant humangranulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF). The introduction of plerixafor, a first-of-its-class molecule that reversibly inhibits the interaction between the chemokine CXCL-12 (also known as SDF-1) and its receptor CXCR-4, has offered new opportunities for the so-called "poor mobilizers" who achieve insufficient mobilization and/or collection with conventional approaches. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Because of the lack of consensus on a definition for poor mobilizers and the relatively high cost of plerixafor, French competent authorities have mandated a postmarketing survey on its use in routine practice. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We report here the results of this nationwide survey that confirms the clinical efficacy of plerixafor, even in the subset of patients who barely increased PB CD34+ cell count in response to rHuG-CSF-containing mobilization regimen. Furthermore, analysis of this registry showed that despite heterogeneity in medical practices, the early-"on-demand" or "preemptive"-introduction of plerixafor was widely used and did not result in an excess of prescriptions, beyond its expected use at the time when marketing authorization was granted.
Authors: B M Haverkos; Y Huang; P Elder; L O'Donnell; D Scholl; B Whittaker; S Vasu; S Penza; L A Andritsos; S M Devine; S M Jaglowski Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 5.483