Literature DB >> 25968552

Proposed method for controlling turbid particles in solid-phase bioluminescent toxicity measurement.

Seul-Ki Yeo1, Jun-Boum Park, Joo-Sung Ahn, Young-Soo Han.   

Abstract

In the recent half century, numerous methods have been developed to assess ecological toxicity. However, the presence of solid-particle turbidity sometimes causes such tests to end with questionable results. Many researchers focused on controlling this arbitrary turbidity effect when using the Microtox® solid-phase toxicity system, but there is not yet a standard method. In this study, we examined four solid-phase sample test methods recommended in the Microtox® manual, or proposed from the literature, and compared the existing methods with our proposed method (centrifuged basic solid-phase test, c-BSPT). Four existing methods use the following strategies to control turbid particles: complete separation of liquid and solid using 0.45-μm filtration before contacting solid samples and bacteria, natural settlement, moderate separation of large particles using coarser pore size filtration, and exclusion of light loss in the toxicity calculation caused by turbidity after full disturbance of samples. Our proposed method uses moderate centrifugation to separate out the heavier soil particles from the lighter bacteria after direct contact between them. Among the solid-phase methods tested, in which the bacteria and solid particles were in direct contact (i.e., the three existing methods and the newly proposed one, c-BSPT), no single method could be recommended as optimal for samples over a range of turbidity. Instead, a simple screening strategy for selecting a sample-dependent solid-phase test method was suggested, depending on the turbidity of the solid suspension. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering solid particles, and the necessity for optimal selection of test method to reduce errors in the measurement of solid-phase toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25968552     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-4559-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  14 in total

1.  Automated color correction method for Vibrio fischeri toxicity test. Comparison of standard and kinetic assays.

Authors:  J Lappalainen; R Juvonen; J Nurmi; M Karp
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  New methodological improvements in the Microtox® solid phase assay.

Authors:  Karen F Burga Pérez; Rayna Charlatchka; Leila Sahli; Jean-François Férard
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Effect of sediment turbidity and color on light output measurement for Microtox Basic Solid-Phase Test.

Authors:  T Campisi; F Abbondanzi; C Casado-Martinez; T A DelValls; R Guerra; A Iacondini
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Microtox solid phase test: Effect of diluent used in toxicity test.

Authors:  Annamaria Volpi Ghirardini; Marco Girardini; Davide Marchetto; Claudio Pantani
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 6.291

5.  Assessment of the LuminoTox leachate phase assay as a complement to the LuminoTox solid phase assay: effect of fine particles in natural sediments.

Authors:  Karen F Burga Pérez; Rayna Charlatchka; Jean-François Férard
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Evaluation of the toxicity of two soils from Jales Mine (Portugal) using aquatic bioassays.

Authors:  Susana Loureiro; Abel L G Ferreira; Amadeu M V M Soares; António J A Nogueira
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  Effect of dust on the viability of Vibrio fischeri in the Microtox Test.

Authors:  K Park; S Q Hee
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  Soil solution extraction techniques for microbial ecotoxicity testing: a comparative evaluation.

Authors:  T Tiensing; S Preston; N Strachan; G I Paton
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2001-02

9.  A comparison of five rapid direct toxicity assessment methods to determine toxicity of pollutants to activated sludge.

Authors:  D J B Dalzell; S Alte; E Aspichueta; A de la Sota; J Etxebarria; M Gutierrez; C C Hoffmann; D Sales; U Obst; N Christofi
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Effect of plant growth on copper solubility and speciation in soil solution samples.

Authors:  P F Römkens; L A Bouwman; G T Boon
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 8.071

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ecotoxicity testing of airborne particulate matter-comparison of sample preparation techniques for the Vibrio fischeri assay.

Authors:  Nora Kováts; Katalin Hubai; Tsend-Ayush Sainnokhoi; András Hoffer; Gábor Teke
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.609

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.