Literature DB >> 25967996

Association between mobile phone use and self-reported well-being in children: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study in Chongqing, China.

Feizhou Zheng1, Peng Gao1, Mindi He1, Min Li1, Jin Tan2, Daiwei Chen3, Zhou Zhou1, Zhengping Yu1, Lei Zhang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In the past decade, the mobile phone (MP) has become extremely popular among children and the average age at which children own their first MP has decreased. The potential health effects of children's exposure to MP have been the subject of widespread public concern. The aim of our study is to investigate the associations between MP use and well-being in children.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: The questionnaires were completed in class with items regarding demographics, MP usage, self-reported well-being (symptoms were taken from the questionnaire of the HBSC survey) and possible confounding factors between October 2011 and May 2012 in Chongqing, China. Data were analysed using χ(2) tests and logistic regression models. PARTICIPANTS: Among the 793 children invited to participate, 781 returned the questionnaires.
RESULTS: In total, 746 (94.1%) valid questionnaires were received. Fatigue was significantly associated with the years of MP usage (OR 1.85; 95% CI 1.07 to 3.22) and the daily duration of MP calls (OR 2.98; 95% CI 1.46 to 6.12). Headache was significantly associated with the daily duration of MP calls (OR 2.85; 95% CI 1.23 to 6.57). However, after adjusting for confounders only, the association between fatigue and MP usage remained statistically significant. There was no significant association between MP use and other physical symptoms in children.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicated that there was a consistent significant association between MP use and fatigue in children. Further in-depth research is needed to explore the potential health effects of MP use in children. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EPIDEMIOLOGY; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25967996      PMCID: PMC4431134          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


We adjusted confounding factors to improve the reliability of the logistic regression results. There may have been some misclassification of self-reported mobile phone (MP) usage. We observed that fatigue was significantly associated with MP use in children.

Introduction

In the past decade, mobile devices are used by more people. Children own their first mobile phone (MP) at an earlier age. A study reported that the average age at which Spanish teenagers had their first MP was 13 years in 2005.1 The average age to own first an MP was 10.4 years in Korean children and adolescents in 2011.2 Since the MP is used by children not only to keep in touch with their relatives or friends, but is also used as a source of entertainment, such as playing games and surfing the Internet, MP use has seeped into their life. The question of whether children are more sensitive and vulnerable to electromagnetic fields produced by MPs than adults has attracted much attention due to the pervasive use of MPs by children. The Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones (IEGMP) reported several possible reasons for the sensitivity as follows: (1) children are likely to be more vulnerable to potentially hazardous agents than adults due to their developing nervous systems, (2) owing to anatomical reasons, such as smaller heads, thinner skulls and higher tissue conductivity of their brains, children may absorb more energy from MPs than do adults,3 and (3) owing to earlier and longer exposure to MPs, children will tend to accumulate a greater risk of detrimental health effects caused by MPs.4 Considering the potential health effects of MPs on human development, research that explored the associations between MP use and well-being in children has increased gradually. So far, there has been no explicit conclusion regarding the associations between MP use and well-being in children. In the studies that investigated the association between exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and symptoms in children and adolescents, participants with more exposure reported a significantly higher intensity of irritation or headache.5 6 In addition, it was reported that children with MP exposure had higher odds of migraines and headache-related symptoms than children with no exposure.7 A population-based cross-sectional study indicated that inattention was significantly associated with MP usage in Chinese adolescents.8 Thomas et al9 found an association between exposure to measured radiofrequency fields and conduct problems in children.9 However, some controversial conclusions have been reported so far. In a double-blind experiment, short-term wideband code division multiple access (WCDMA) radiofrequency electromagnetic fields generated no significant changes in subjective symptoms (fatigue, headache, dizziness, etc) in teenagers.10 In some neurophysiology studies, researchers were also unable to observe any exposure-related effects on the EEG or cognitive performance in participants.11 12 Owing to the uncertainty of association between MP use and well-being in children, our study aims to investigate the potential health effects of MP use on self-reported well-being in children in mainland China.

Methods

Subjects

There were two primary schools registered in Chongqing, China that participated in this cross-sectional study. A total of 793 questionnaires were distributed to fifth grade pupils who were randomly selected using their student ID numbers between October 2011 and May 2012. After obtaining written consent from the pupils’ parents or guardians, the questionnaires were distributed and collected during school hours by the research staff who had previously received epidemiological survey training. The pupils filled out the survey in the presence of their class teacher and could ask the research staff if they encountered any problems with the questions. From the 781 (98.5%) questionnaires with responses, 746 (94.1%) valid questionnaires were included in the final statistical analysis.

Questionnaire survey

The questionnaires were composed of four parts as follows: demographic information, information on MP usage, self-reported physical symptoms and possible confounding factors (see online supplementary 1, English version; online supplementary 2, Chinese version).

Demographic information

The demographic information included name, sex (male/female), age, height, weight, school, grade, home address (rural/urban residence) and telephone number.

Information on MP usage

The information on MP usage included MP ownership, years of MP usage and daily duration of MP calls. To obtain information on MP ownership, pupils were asked to answer the following question: “Do you own an MP?” The years of MP usage was assessed using the following question: “How many years have you used an MP?” Last, the question “How much time do you spend on making phone calls per day (min/day)?” was used to estimate the daily duration of MP calls. For all of the above questions, MP use included use of other people's MPs.

Well-being in children

Well-being variables over the past 6 months were assessed and included headache, dizziness, fatigue, sleeping problems, feeling low and heart beating fast. The six symptoms were taken from the questionnaire of the HBSC (Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children) survey and were assessed on a 5-point Likert scale (nearly daily, several times a week, nearly every week, about once a month, seldom or never).13 A symptom was considered to be present if it was reported at least ‘nearly every week’. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the well-being items was 0.83.

Confounding factors

Academic stress (yes/no), daily exercise (yes/no) and having a recent cold or flu (yes/no, answer by their parents) were considered to be confounding factors as well as sex, age and home address.

Statistical analysis

χ2 tests were used to compare the prevalence of physical symptoms between different classifications of MP usage. Adjusted ORs and 95% CIs were obtained using logistic regression models to assess the potential associations between the years of MP usage, the daily duration of MP calls and the prevalence of well-being symptoms in children. Adjusted ORs were also calculated after adjusting for sex, age, rural/urban residence, academic stress, daily exercise and having a recent cold or flu. Assessment of the fit between the model and the data was gauged by the goodness-of-fit test. Since the ‘years of MP usage’ variable was too small to split into tertiles, we considered the variable of never owning an MP as using MP 0 year, and the variable of the years of MP usage was split into using an MP for 1 year and using an MP for more than 1 year. The ‘daily duration of the MP calls’ variable was divided into two. In addition, a symptom was considered to be present if it was reported at least ‘nearly every week’. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05 in this study. Categorical variables were summarised using the corresponding percentages, and continuous variables were generally summarised using descriptive statistics (mean±SD). Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS V.19.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA).

Results

Description of the demographics and MP usage

Among the 793 children in the two primary schools invited to participate, 781 (98.5%) returned the questionnaires. After 35 (4.4%) incomplete questionnaires were excluded, 746 (94.1%) valid questionnaires were used in the statistical analysis. The participants included 389 (52.1%) males and 357 (47.9%) females. The average age of the participants in the survey was 10.6±0.6 years (9–12 years), which was representative of the normal age of the fifth-grade primary school students in China. A total of 544 (72.9%) participants owned MPs at the time the survey was conducted and the average year of MP usage was 1.3±1.5 years. More than half (53.4%) of the participants spent fewer than 10 min on calls daily (table 1). The detailed descriptive distributions of sociodemographic characteristics and MP usage are shown in table 1.
Table 1

Distribution of the surveyed population according to sociodemographic characteristics and MP usage (N=746)

CharacteristicPrevalence n (%)
Sex
 Male389 (52.1)
 Female357 (47.9)
Age, years
 96 (0.8)
 10341 (45.7)
 11359 (48.1)
 1239 (5.2)
Rural/urban
 Rural174 (23.3)
 Urban572 (76.7)
MP ownership
 Do not own an MP202 (27.1)
 Own an MP544 (72.9)
Years of MP usage
 0 Year219 (29.4)
 1 Year259 (34.7)
 >1 year257 (34.5)
Daily duration of calls
 0–10 min/day398 (53.4)
 >10 min/day132 (17.7)

CharacteristicMean±SD (minimum–maximum)

Age10.6±0.6 (9–12)
Height (cm)148.5±6.1 (140–190)
Weight (kg)43.0±11.5 (30–75)
Years of MP usage1.3±1.5 (0–8)

MP, mobile phone.

Distribution of the surveyed population according to sociodemographic characteristics and MP usage (N=746) MP, mobile phone.

Association between MP use and physical symptoms

The most frequently reported physical symptom was sleeping problems (17.8%), followed by fatigue (13.9%) and dizziness (12.7%; figure 1). The result showed that fatigue was significantly associated with both the years of MP usage (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.07 to 3.00; table 2) and the daily duration of MP calls (OR 2.54; 95% CI 1.27 to 5.05; table 3). Headache (OR 2.85; 95% CI 1.23 to 6.57) was significantly associated with the daily duration of MP calls (table 3).
Figure 1

The prevalence of the self-reported physical symptoms (n=746).

Table 2

Association between the years of MP usage and well-being in children (n=746)

SymptomCategories of MP usagen (%)p^OR (95% CI)Adjusted OR (95% CI)†
HeadacheMP use years0.317
 0 year (ref)22 (10.0)1.001.00
 1 year20 (7.7)0.75 (0.40 to 1.41)0.60 (0.31 to 1.16)
 >1 year30 (11.6)1.18 (0.66 to 2.12)0.87 (0.47 to 1.62)
DizzinessMP use years0.778
 0 year (ref)31 (14.1)1.001.00
 1 year31 (11.9)0.83 (0.48 to 1.41)0.75 (0.42 to 1.32)
 >1 year33 (12.8)0.89 (0.53 to 1.52)0.93 (0.57 to 1.57)
FatigueMP use years0.010
 0 year (ref)26 (11.8)1.001.00
 1 year28 (10.8)0.90 (0.51 to 1.59)0.89 (0.49 to 1.75)
 >1 year50 (19.4)1.79 (1.07 to 3.00)*1.85 (1.07–3.22)*
Sleeping problemsMP use years0.619
 0 year (ref)36 (16.4)1.001.00
 1 year46 (17.7)1.10 (0.68 to 1.77)1.05 (0.63–1.75)
 >1 year51 (19.8)1.26 (0.79 to 2.02)1.25 (0.75–2.09)
Feeling lowMP use years0.853
 0 year (ref)22 (10.0)1.001.00
 1 year30 (11.9)1.17 (0.66 to 2.10)1.17 (0.64 to 2.15)
 >1 year29 (11.4)1.14 (0.63 to 2.05)1.28 (0.69 to 2.37)
Heart beating fastMP use years0.182
 0 year (ref)13 (5.9)1.001.00
 1 year24 (9.2)1.62 (0.80 to 3.26)1.56 (0.75 to 3.24)
 >1 year14 (5.4)0.91 (0.42 to 1.99)0.82 (0.36 to 1.89)

p^ obtained through χ2 test.

*p<0.05.

†Adjusted for sex, age, rural/urban residence, academic stress, daily exercise and having a recent cold or flu.

MP, mobile phone.

Table 3

Association between the daily duration of MP calls and well-being in children (n=746)

SymptomCategories of MP usagen (%)p^OR (95% CI)Adjusted OR (95% CI)†
HeadacheDuration of calls0.079
 1 year
 0–10 min/day (ref)13 (6.6)1.001.00
 >10 min/day7 (13.0)2.12 (0.80 to 5.61)1.71 (0.60 to 4.92)
 >1 year
 0–10 min/day18 (9.7)1.53 (0.73 to 3.23)1.28 (0.60 to 2.75)
 >10 min/day12 (16.7)2.85 (1.23 to 6.57)*2.35 (0.97 to 5.70)
DizzinessDuration of calls0.471
 1 year
 0–10 min/day (ref)21 (10.6)1.001.00
 >10 min/day10 (18.5)1.92 (0.84 to 4.36)1.48 (0.61 to 3.62)
 >1 year
 0–10 min/day23 (12.4)1.26 (0.67 to 2.34)1.22 (0.59 to 2.17)
 >10 min/day10 (13.9)1.36 (0.61 to 3.05)1.28 (0.56 to 2.97)
FatigueDuration of calls0.025
 1 year
 0–10 min/day (ref)23 (11.6)1.001.00
 >10 min/day5 (9.3)0.78 (0.28 to 2.15)0.80 (0.28 to 2.27)
 >1 year
 0–10 min/day32 (17.2)1.59 (0.89 to 2.84)1.63 (0.89 to 2.99)
 >10 min/day18 (25.0)2.54 (1.27 to 5.05)*2.98 (1.46 to 6.12)*
Sleeping problemsDuration of calls0.204
 1 year
 0–10 min/day (ref)32 (16.2)1.001.00
 >10 min/day14 (25.9)1.82 (0.89 to 3.72)1.51 (0.69 to 3.28)
 >1 year
 0–10 min/day33 (17.7)1.13 (0.66 to 1.92)1.12 (0.63 to 1.98)
 >10 min/day18 (25.0)1.73 (0.90 to 3.33)1.82 (0.89 to 3.70)
Feeling lowDuration of calls0.576
 1 year
 0–10 min/day (ref)20 (10.1)1.001.00
 >10 min/day9 (16.7)1.78 (0.76 to 4.17)1.56 (0.64 to 3.85)
 >1 year
 0–10 min/day20 (10.8)1.08 (0.56 to 2.08)1.14 (0.58 to 2.34)
 >10 min/day9 (12.5)1.27 (0.55 to 2.94)1.44 (0.61 to 3.38)
Heart beating fastDuration of calls0.375
 1 year
 0–10 min/day (ref)19 (9.6)1.001.00
 >10 min/day5 (9.3)0.96 (0.34 to 2.71)0.62 (0.19 to 1.99)
 >1 year
 0–10 min/day10 (5.4)0.54 (0.24 to 1.19)0.47 (0.21 to 1.06)
 >10 min/day4 (5.6)0.55 (0.18 to 1.69)0.36 (0.10 to 1.29)

p^ obtained through χ2 test.

*p<0.05.

†Adjusted for sex, age, rural/urban residence, academic stress, daily exercise and having a recent cold or flu.

MP, mobile phone.

Association between the years of MP usage and well-being in children (n=746) p^ obtained through χ2 test. *p<0.05. †Adjusted for sex, age, rural/urban residence, academic stress, daily exercise and having a recent cold or flu. MP, mobile phone. Association between the daily duration of MP calls and well-being in children (n=746) p^ obtained through χ2 test. *p<0.05. †Adjusted for sex, age, rural/urban residence, academic stress, daily exercise and having a recent cold or flu. MP, mobile phone. The prevalence of the self-reported physical symptoms (n=746). After adjusting for sex, age, rural/urban residence, academic stress, daily exercise and having a recent cold or flu, the association between headache and the daily duration of MP calls was no longer statistically significant. However, the prevalence of fatigue was still significantly associated with the years of MP usage (OR 1.85; 95% CI 1.07 to 3.22; table 2; see online supplementary 3, Wald value and significance) and the daily duration of MP calls (OR 2.98; 95% CI 1.46 to 6.12) after adjusting for confounders (table 3; see online supplementary 4, Wald value and significance). Neither the years of MP usage nor the daily duration of MP calls was found to be significantly associated with other physical symptoms (dizziness, sleeping problems, feeling low or heart beating fast). The χ2 test and logistic regression results for the association between MP usage and self-reported symptoms are presented in tables 2 and 3.

Discussion

This is one of the first studies to investigate the potential association between MP use and well-being in children in mainland China. With the growing popularity of MP, children have begun to use MPs at an earlier age and have a longer lifetime exposure to MPs. The MP usage rate in children has reached 72.9% in our study, and it was higher than the prevalence of MP usage reported in previous similar research in Korea (64.5%),2 China (63.2%)14 and Iran (31.4%).15 One possible reason was that most of the participants in the present survey lived in an urban area and were more likely to own MPs than a rural population. We investigated the possible association between MP use and well-being in children, and our results revealed that fatigue was significantly associated with MP usage. Comparing the prevalence of headache, fatigue, sleeping problems and feeling low in this survey with previous studies using the HBSC survey,6 16 we found an average decrease in participants reporting any present symptoms. One interpretation for the decrease was that younger participants may feel fewer symptoms. The mean age (10.6 years) of participants in our study was younger than that in previous research (12.3 years).16 This finding can also be supported by the fact that the prevalence of symptoms in children was lower than that in adolescents.6 We observed that children with the highest level of the daily duration of calls felt headache significantly more than did those at other levels. One previous study revealed that participants with a measured exposure to MPs in the highest quartile reported a statistically significantly higher intensity of headache as well.5 Sudan et al7 also found that exposure to MPs was associated with headaches in children. However, the association between headache and MP use was not statistically significant after adjusting for confounding factors. The result was in agreement with those of previous researches that observed a non-significant difference in headaches between MP exposed and non-exposed participants.17–19 Since the significant association between headache and MP use occurred only once, we consider that this might be due to chance or multiple testing.6 This study indicated the consistently significant associations between fatigue and MP usage, including the years of MP usage and the daily duration of calls. Previous studies have similarly reported that fatigue was associated with MP usage.2 20 21 Moreover, all of the associations reached statistical significance at the highest level of MP usage. Ikeda et al also found that fatigue in those with longer MP use (>33 h/week) of MP use was significantly higher than others. A possible reason was that the fatigue related to MP use was more likely to be a mental disorder than a physiological one, due to long-time MP exposure serving as a chronic stressor.20 Sleep disturbance was reported as a significant contributor to fatigue.22 Sleep quality worsened23 24 or sleep duration shortened23 25–27 with increasing MP use time. Maybe that is another reason for the association between fatigue and MP usage. On the other hand, no significant10 or an inverse association28 between MP use and fatigue has been reported. These studies were based on adults or teenagers, whereas we focused on children. Children may be more sensitive and vulnerable to electromagnetic fields produced by MPs than adults, and this difference may explain the controversial results.3 4 29 The prevalence of dizziness, sleeping problems, feeling low and heart beating fast were not significantly affected by the different classifications of MP usage in our study. The result was in line with some previous similar researches that have indicated no significant association between dizziness,5 6 30 31 sleeping problems,32 feeling low16 33 and MP use. Nonetheless, some cross-sectional studies have revealed that MP users have complained of dizziness,2 34 sleeping problems23 24 and depressed mood21 more frequently according to the time of MP usage. These controversial conclusions might be due to the different valuation methods used to determine MP exposure. More than half of the above researches that did not find significant associations between MP use and well-being were assessed by dosimetry5 6 32 or MP exposure experimental studies.18 33 As self-reported exposure did not count as real MP exposure, the observed associations were mostly likely due to differential misclassification based on an overestimation of self-reported exposure and subjective symptoms.5 This cross-sectional survey is one of the first studies that investigated the association between MP use and well-being in Chinese children. The schools that we chose were typical and participants in our research are representative of primary school students in China. The response rate (98.5%) in this study was higher than that in previous similar cross-sectional studies in Japan (84.4%),23 Turkey (90.8%)35 and Sweden (63.5%).36 One possible explanation was that the questionnaire survey was administered during class. In our study, academic stress, daily exercise and having a recent cold or flu were taken into account as confounding factors, as well as sex, age, rural/urban residence, to improve the reliability of the results. A limitation of this research was that the cross-sectional study design could not adequately reveal the causality of the factors.37 To reduce the misclassification of self-reported MP usage, we would obtain detailed phone call data from a mobile service supplier or use personal dosimeters to assess individual exposure to MPs. The unavailable validity data for the Chinese version of the HBSC questionnaire were another limitation of this study. Since only a small number of symptoms were examined in this study, we do not consider our study to be conclusive. More comprehensive research is needed to explore the associations between MP usage and well-being in children.

Conclusions

In general, this study indicates a significant association between fatigue in children and their MP use including the years of MP usage and the daily duration of calls. Since the significant association between headache and MP use was a single occurrence, we consider that this might be due to chance or multiple testing. Further in-depth research is needed to explore the potential health effects of MP use in children.
  36 in total

1.  Subjective health complaints in adolescence. A cross-national comparison of prevalence and dimensionality.

Authors:  S Haugland; B Wold; J Stevenson; L E Aaroe; B Woynarowska
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  Prevalence of subjective poor health symptoms associated with exposure to electromagnetic fields among university students.

Authors:  S M J Mortazavi; J Ahmadi; M Shariati
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.010

3.  Mobile phone use and health symptoms in children.

Authors:  Chang-Ta Chiu; Ya-Hui Chang; Chu-Chieh Chen; Ming-Chung Ko; Chung-Yi Li
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  The association between use of mobile phones after lights out and sleep disturbances among Japanese adolescents: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Takeshi Munezawa; Yoshitaka Kaneita; Yoneatsu Osaki; Hideyuki Kanda; Masumi Minowa; Kenji Suzuki; Susumu Higuchi; Junichiro Mori; Ryuichiro Yamamoto; Takashi Ohida
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  A survey study on some neurological symptoms and sensations experienced by long term users of mobile phones.

Authors:  Kemal Balikci; I Cem Ozcan; Dilek Turgut-Balik; Hasan H Balik
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  2005-02

6.  The association between problematic cellular phone use and risky behaviors and low self-esteem among Taiwanese adolescents.

Authors:  Yuan-Sheng Yang; Ju-Yu Yen; Chih-Hung Ko; Chung-Ping Cheng; Cheng-Fang Yen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 2 of a cross-sectional study with measured radio frequency electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  G Berg-Beckhoff; M Blettner; B Kowall; J Breckenkamp; B Schlehofer; S Schmiedel; C Bornkessel; U Reis; P Potthoff; J Schüz
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Correlational analysis of neck/shoulder pain and low back pain with the use of digital products, physical activity and psychological status among adolescents in Shanghai.

Authors:  Zhi Shan; Guoying Deng; Jipeng Li; Yangyang Li; Yongxing Zhang; Qinghua Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Epidemiological characteristics of mobile phone ownership and use in korean children and adolescents.

Authors:  Yoon-Hwan Byun; Mina Ha; Ho-Jang Kwon; Kyung-Hwa Choi; Eunae Burm; Yeyong Choi; Myung-Ho Lim; Seung-Jin Yoo; Ki-Chung Paik; Hyung-Do Choi; Nam Kim
Journal:  Environ Health Toxicol       Date:  2013-12-31

10.  The relationship between adolescents' well-being and their wireless phone use: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mary Redmayne; Euan Smith; Michael J Abramson
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 5.984

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the physiological and health-related effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure from wireless communication devices on children and adolescents in experimental and epidemiological human studies.

Authors:  Lambert Bodewein; Dagmar Dechent; David Graefrath; Thomas Kraus; Tobias Krause; Sarah Driessen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Smartphone use and primary headache: A cross-sectional hospital-based study.

Authors:  Pratik Uttarwar; Deepti Vibha; Kameshwar Prasad; Achal Kumar Srivastava; Awadh Kishor Pandit; Sada Nand Dwivedi
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2020-12

3.  A cross-sectional study of the association between mobile phone use and symptoms of ill health.

Authors:  Yong Min Cho; Hee Jin Lim; Hoon Jang; Kyunghee Kim; Jae Wook Choi; Chol Shin; Seung Ku Lee; Jong Hwa Kwon; Nam Kim
Journal:  Environ Health Toxicol       Date:  2016-10-26

4.  A follow-up study of the association between mobile phone use and symptoms of ill health.

Authors:  Yong Min Cho; Hee Jin Lim; Hoon Jang; Kyunghee Kim; Jae Wook Choi; Chol Shin; Seung Ku Lee; Jong Hwa Kwon; Nam Kim
Journal:  Environ Health Toxicol       Date:  2016-12-29

5.  The Effect of a Single 30-Min Long Term Evolution Mobile Phone-Like Exposure on Thermal Pain Threshold of Young Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Vecsei; György Thuróczy; István Hernádi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Impact of Adolescents' Screen Time and Nocturnal Mobile Phone-Related Awakenings on Sleep and General Health Symptoms: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Milena Foerster; Andrea Henneke; Shala Chetty-Mhlanga; Martin Röösli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  1,800 MHz Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Irradiation Impairs Neurite Outgrowth With a Decrease in Rap1-GTP in Primary Mouse Hippocampal Neurons and Neuro2a Cells.

Authors:  Yanqi Li; Ping Deng; Chunhai Chen; Qinlong Ma; Huifeng Pi; Mindi He; Yonghui Lu; Peng Gao; Chao Zhou; Zhixin He; Yanwen Zhang; Zhengping Yu; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-11-22

8.  Exploring Deeper Causes Linking Adolescents' Mental Disorders to Mobile Phone Use Problems: Grounded Theory Approach.

Authors:  Zeyuan Sun; Yue Zhou; Bing Gui; Zhenmi Liu; Yinan Zhang
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-02-21

9.  Mobile Phone Use and The Risk of Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cross-sectional Studies.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Hui Su; Wei Xie; Shengyuan Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.