Literature DB >> 25967958

An Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Ovarian Malignant Germ Cell Tumors Who Are Treated with Fertility-Preserving Surgery.

Zhi-juan Yang1, Zhen-chan Liu, Ren-ji Wei, Li Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To analyze the clinicopathological factors that affect the prognosis and fertility of patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCTs).
METHODS: The medical records and follow-up data of 106 patients with MOGCTs who were treated at The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University between January 1986 and December 2010 were enrolled in this study. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to analyze the survival curves. The different prognoses among the various clinicopathological factors were evaluated using a univariate analysis and a log-rank test. The multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression method. A logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of different factors on the prognoses and fertility.
RESULTS: The median age at primary treatment was 22 years (range: 9-61years). A total of 59 patients received fertility-preserving surgery, 45 received radical surgery and 94 received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up time was 56.5 months (range: 2-309 months). A total of 11 patients experienced a recurrence, and 23 patients died from their cancer. Of the 47 patients who are alive without tumor, 45 have normal menstruation. Of the 39 patients who wished to become pregnant, 31 patients had 33 successful pregnancies that resulted in 33 live births. No statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed with respect to the progression-free survival (PFS; 67.6 vs. 63.3%), the overall survival (OS; 70 vs. 64.1%) and the mortality rate (15.3 vs. 31.3%) between patients who received fertility-preserving surgery and those who received radical surgery. The univariate analysis showed that the pathological types, postoperative residual tumor size, lymph node resection, and omental resection were associated with OS (p < 0.1), whereas postoperative residual tumor size, number of chemotherapy cycles, lymph node resection, and omental resection were associated with PFS (p < 0.1). The multivariate analysis showed that only the postoperative residual tumor size was an independent prognostic factor of OS, whereas the postoperative residual tumor size, number of chemotherapy cycles and lymph node resection were independent prognostic factors of PFS. No statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed with respect to the OS, PFS and fertility between patients who received fertility-preserving surgery and those who were treated with or without comprehensive surgical staging.
CONCLUSION: MOGCTs can achieve a good prognosis after surgery and chemotherapy. Postoperative residual tumor size was an independent prognostic factor of PFS and OS. Moreover, comprehensive surgical staging cannot improve the prognosis. Fertility-preserving surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy appeared to have little or no effect on prognosis and fertility.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25967958     DOI: 10.1159/000381771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest        ISSN: 0378-7346            Impact factor:   2.031


  9 in total

1.  The individualized significance of lymphadenectomy across all age groups and histologies in malignant ovarian germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Jieyu Wang; Ruifang Chen; Jun Li; Xin Lu
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Incidence and Survival Rates for Female Malignant Germ Cell Tumors: An Institutional Review.

Authors:  Afshan Saeed Usmani; Iqra Yasin; Rehan B Asif; Nazish Kahlid; Aamir Syed
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-26

3.  Possibility of women treated with fertility-sparing surgery for non-epithelial ovarian tumors to safely and successfully become pregnant-a Chinese retrospective cohort study among 148 cases.

Authors:  Bin Yang; Yan Yu; Jing Chen; Yan Zhang; Ye Yin; Nan Yu; Ge Chen; Shifei Zhu; Haiyan Huang; Yongqun Yuan; Jihui Ai; Xinyu Wang; Kezhen Li
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Clinical and pathologic features of patients with non-epithelial ovarian cancer: retrospective analysis of a single institution 15-year experience.

Authors:  E Kempf; G Desamericq; B Vieites; I Diaz-Padilla; E Calvo; P Estevez; A Garcia-Arreza; M A Martinez-Maestre; I Duran
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with recurrent and persistent malignant ovarian germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Jinhui Wang; Xiuping Zhuo; Jiaxin Yang; Dongyan Cao; Keng Shen; Huifang Huang; Ming Wu; Lingya Pan; Yang Xiang; Lina Guo
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 6.  Clinicopathological factors and prognosis analysis of 39 cases of non-gestational ovarian choriocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaodie Liu; Xue Zhang; Yingxin Pang; Yanhui Ma; Xiaolei Zhang; Peishu Liu
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Fertility-sparing surgery in advanced stage malignant ovarian germ cell tumor: a case report.

Authors:  Montassar Ghalleb; Hatem Bouzaiene; Skander Slim; Achraf Hadiji; Monia Hechiche; Jamel Ben Hassouna; Khaled Rahal
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2017-12-17

8.  Fertility sparing surgery in malignant ovarian Germ cell tumor (MOGCT): 15 years experiences.

Authors:  Narges Zamani; Mohadese Rezaei Poor; Sedigheh Ghasemian Dizajmehr; Shima Alizadeh; Mitra Modares Gilani
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 9.  Non-Gestational Ovarian Choriocarcinoma: A Rare Ovarian Cancer Subtype.

Authors:  Sean Cronin; Nishat Ahmed; Amaranta D Craig; Stephanie King; Min Huang; Christina S Chu; Gina M Mantia-Smaldone
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.