Literature DB >> 25967343

Field of view advantage of conjugate adaptive optics in microscopy applications.

Jerome Mertz, Hari Paudel, Thomas G Bifano.   

Abstract

The imaging performance of an optical microscope can be degraded by sample-induced aberrations. A general strategy to undo the effect of these aberrations is to apply wavefront correction with a deformable mirror (DM). In most cases the DM is placed conjugate to the microscope pupil, called pupil adaptive optics (AO). When the aberrations are spatially variant an alternative configuration involves placing the DM conjugate to the main source of aberrations, called conjugate AO. We provide a theoretical and experimental comparison of both configurations for the simplified case where spatially variant aberrations are produced by a well-defined phase screen. We pay particular attention to the resulting correction field of view (FOV). Conjugate AO is found to provide a significant FOV advantage. While this result is well known in the astronomical community, our goal here is to recast it specifically for the optical microscopy community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25967343      PMCID: PMC4629780          DOI: 10.1364/AO.54.003498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Opt        ISSN: 1559-128X            Impact factor:   1.980


  20 in total

1.  Adaptive-optics corrections available for the whole sky

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Computational adaptive optics for broadband optical interferometric tomography of biological tissue.

Authors:  Steven G Adie; Benedikt W Graf; Adeel Ahmad; P Scott Carney; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Practical implementation of adaptive optics in multiphoton microscopy.

Authors:  P Marsh; D Burns; J Girkin
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2003-05-19       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Laboratory MCAO Test-Bed for Developing Wavefront Sensing Concepts.

Authors:  A V Goncharov; J C Dainty; S Esposito; A Puglisi
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  High-speed volumetric imaging of cone photoreceptors with adaptive optics spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Barry Cense; Jungtae Rha; Ravi S Jonnal; Weihua Gao; Robert J Zawadzki; John S Werner; Steve Jones; Scot Olivier; Donald T Miller
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Quadriwave lateral shearing interferometry for quantitative phase microscopy of living cells.

Authors:  Pierre Bon; Guillaume Maucort; Benoit Wattellier; Serge Monneret
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Dynamic aberration correction for multiharmonic microscopy.

Authors:  Nicolas Olivier; Delphine Débarre; Emmanuel Beaurepaire
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.776

8.  Pyramid phase microscopy.

Authors:  Ignacio Iglesias
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.776

9.  Quantitative phase imaging using a partitioned detection aperture.

Authors:  Ashwin B Parthasarathy; Kengyeh K Chu; Tim N Ford; Jerome Mertz
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.776

10.  Rapid adaptive optical recovery of optimal resolution over large volumes.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Daniel E Milkie; Ankur Saxena; Peter Engerer; Thomas Misgeld; Marianne E Bronner; Jeff Mumm; Eric Betzig
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  17 in total

1.  Axial range of conjugate adaptive optics in two-photon microscopy.

Authors:  Hari P Paudel; John Taranto; Jerome Mertz; Thomas Bifano
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  In vivo volumetric imaging of biological dynamics in deep tissue via wavefront engineering.

Authors:  Lingjie Kong; Jianyong Tang; Meng Cui
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 3.  Three-Dimensional Localization of Single Molecules for Super-Resolution Imaging and Single-Particle Tracking.

Authors:  Lexy von Diezmann; Yoav Shechtman; W E Moerner
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  High-resolution in vivo imaging of mouse brain through the intact skull.

Authors:  Jung-Hoon Park; Wei Sun; Meng Cui
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Widefield fluorescence microscopy with sensor-based conjugate adaptive optics using oblique back illumination.

Authors:  Jiang Li; Thomas G Bifano; Jerome Mertz
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Aberration measurement and correction on a large field of view in fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  T Furieri; D Ancora; G Calisesi; S Morara; A Bassi; S Bonora
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Adaptive optics for high-resolution imaging.

Authors:  Karen M Hampson; Raphaël Turcotte; Donald T Miller; Kazuhiro Kurokawa; Jared R Males; Na Ji; Martin J Booth
Journal:  Nat Rev Methods Primers       Date:  2021-10-14

8.  Separation of ballistic and diffusive fluorescence photons in confocal Light-Sheet Microscopy of Arabidopsis roots.

Authors:  Tobias Meinert; Olaf Tietz; Klaus J Palme; Alexander Rohrbach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Large-field-of-view imaging by multi-pupil adaptive optics.

Authors:  Jung-Hoon Park; Lingjie Kong; Yifeng Zhou; Meng Cui
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Characterisation of the effects of optical aberrations in single molecule techniques.

Authors:  Benjamin C Coles; Stephen E D Webb; Noah Schwartz; Daniel J Rolfe; Marisa Martin-Fernandez; Valentina Lo Schiavo
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.