Literature DB >> 25966991

The need to do better - Are we still letting our patients down and at what cost?

Grant Philip Cumming1, Heather Currie2, Edward Morris3, Rik Moncur4, Amanda J Lee5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To survey women's views on HRT and alternative therapies and make comparisons with 2007 data. STUDY
DESIGN: A questionnaire on a UK patient-tailored independent clinician-led website with anonymous responses analysed using descriptive statistics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Answers to survey questions in 2007 and 2014.
RESULTS: A total of 1476 responses from 33 countries were obtained. Almost 70% of respondents had used/would consider using HRT. Over the last 5 years, 27.7% felt that their views had changed for the better. Most obtained information from health professionals or the Internet. About 51.1% felt that their family doctor did not recognise the importance of the menopause with one-third feeling resistance to being offered HRT. Compared to 2007, significantly more women were aware of the different risks associated with different types of HRT. More women were able to respond positively to the question asking whether or not they felt able to make an informed choice regarding HRT/alternative therapies.
CONCLUSIONS: There has been negativity and confusion regarding HRT management since the beginning of the millennium. Our findings suggest that we, as health professionals, continue to let our patients down with poor provision of information, inaccurate or wrong information, or access to the right care. The cost of this is women living with preventable sequelae associated with the menopausal transition with a consequent adverse impact on health and the health economy. The importance of the menopause consultation as part of a life course approach is highlighted as well as the emerging discipline of Health Web Science.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HRT; Menopause; alternative therapies; health web science; online questionnaires

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25966991     DOI: 10.1177/2053369115586122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Post Reprod Health        ISSN: 2053-3691


  8 in total

1.  Obesity, bone density relative to body weight and prevalent vertebral fracture at age 62 years: the Newcastle thousand families study.

Authors:  H A Rudman; F Birrell; M S Pearce; S P Tuck; R M Francis; L Treadgold; K Hind
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Barriers to the Care of Menopausal Women.

Authors:  Sarah L Berga; Vesna D Garovic
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Best practice for HRT: unpicking the evidence.

Authors:  Louise R Newson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  The dangers of compounded bioidentical hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  Louise Newson; Janice Rymer
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  What the Women's Health Initiative has taught us about menopausal hormone therapy.

Authors:  Rebecca C Chester; Juliana M Kling; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Behaviours and attitudes influencing treatment decisions for menopausal symptoms in five European countries.

Authors:  Ginger D Constantine; Shelli Graham; Cathy Clerinx; Brian A Bernick; Mitchell Krassan; Sebastian Mirkin; Heather Currie
Journal:  Post Reprod Health       Date:  2016-02-18

7.  Predictors of Initiating Hormone Replacement Therapy in Postmenopausal Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Hasan Çilgin
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2019-01-09

8.  Report from a large and comprehensive single-center Women's Health Cardiology Clinic.

Authors:  Shlomit Schuchalter Ludmir; Tamir Bental; Osnat Itzhaki Ben Zadok; Alon Eisen; Tzippy Shochat; Irit Heruti; Ran Kornowski; Avital Porter
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.