Tarek P Ghoneim1,2, Daniel D Sjoberg3, William Lowrance4, Shahrokh F Shariat4, Caroline Savage3, Melanie Bernstein4, Paul Russo4. 1. Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. tarek.p.ghoneim@gmail.com. 2. Faculté de Médecine Paris-Île-de-France-Ouest, Hôpital FOCH, Service d'urologie, Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 40 Rue Worth, 92150, Suresnes, France. tarek.p.ghoneim@gmail.com. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 4. Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe renal functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN) for a tumor in a solitary kidney using the estimated glomerular filtration rate eGFR (MDRD equation). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 103 cases of PN in a solitary kidney at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from December 1989 to July 2010 was conducted. The postoperative eGFR measurements were broken into three timeframes: 1-10 days after PN, 10 days-8 weeks after PN, and 4-12 months after PN. Several factors were analyzed for their impact on postoperative eGFR on univariate and multivariable analyses. To illustrate the change in eGFR after surgery over time, a univariate generalized estimating equation (GEE) model was constructed. RESULTS: Median preoperative eGFR was 47 ml/min/1.72 m(2) (IQR 39, 58). Higher preoperative eGFR, younger age at the time of PN, less estimated blood loss during PN, increased time between PN and previous radical nephrectomy, and decreased arterial clamp (ischemia) time were all significantly associated with increased postoperative eGFR in the early postoperative period on multivariable analysis. Younger age and higher preoperative eGFR were the only variables significantly associated with increased postoperative eGFR at all three time points. From the GEE model, postoperative eGFR continues to rise after PN until it reaches a plateau approximately 1 month after PN without attaining preoperative levels. CONCLUSION: PN for tumors in a solitary kidney is feasible and safe. In our model, non-modifiable factors predict the long-term postoperative eGFR: Young patients with healthy kidneys have superior renal functional results.
OBJECTIVE: To describe renal functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN) for a tumor in a solitary kidney using the estimated glomerular filtration rate eGFR (MDRD equation). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 103 cases of PN in a solitary kidney at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from December 1989 to July 2010 was conducted. The postoperative eGFR measurements were broken into three timeframes: 1-10 days after PN, 10 days-8 weeks after PN, and 4-12 months after PN. Several factors were analyzed for their impact on postoperative eGFR on univariate and multivariable analyses. To illustrate the change in eGFR after surgery over time, a univariate generalized estimating equation (GEE) model was constructed. RESULTS: Median preoperative eGFR was 47 ml/min/1.72 m(2) (IQR 39, 58). Higher preoperative eGFR, younger age at the time of PN, less estimated blood loss during PN, increased time between PN and previous radical nephrectomy, and decreased arterial clamp (ischemia) time were all significantly associated with increased postoperative eGFR in the early postoperative period on multivariable analysis. Younger age and higher preoperative eGFR were the only variables significantly associated with increased postoperative eGFR at all three time points. From the GEE model, postoperative eGFR continues to rise after PN until it reaches a plateau approximately 1 month after PN without attaining preoperative levels. CONCLUSION: PN for tumors in a solitary kidney is feasible and safe. In our model, non-modifiable factors predict the long-term postoperative eGFR: Young patients with healthy kidneys have superior renal functional results.
Authors: Brian R Lane; Paul Russo; Robert G Uzzo; Adrian V Hernandez; Stephen A Boorjian; R Houston Thompson; Amr F Fergany; Thomas E Love; Steven C Campbell Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-12-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: R Houston Thompson; Brian R Lane; Christine M Lohse; Bradley C Leibovich; Amr Fergany; Igor Frank; Inderbir S Gill; Michael L Blute; Steven C Campbell Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Zeynep Gul; Kyle A Blum; David J Paulucci; Ronney Abaza; Daniel D Eun; Akshay Bhandari; Ashok K Hemal; James Porter; Ketan K Badani Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2018-10-12
Authors: Steffen Lebentrau; Sven Rauter; Daniel Baumunk; Frank Christoph; Frank König; Matthias May; Martin Schostak Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Jan Ebbing; Felix Menzel; Paolo Frumento; Kurt Miller; Bernhard Ralla; Tom Florian Fuller; Jonas Busch; Justin William Collins; Christofer Adding; Hans Helge Seifert; Peter Ardelt; Christian Wetterauer; Timm Westhoff; Carsten Kempkensteffen Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Benjamin N Schmeusser; Arnold R Palacios; Eric Midenberg; Reza Nabavizadeh; Viraj A Master; Shreyas S Joshi Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-08-03 Impact factor: 5.738