Literature DB >> 25966435

Assessment of volatile and non-volatile compounds in durian wines fermented with four commercial non-Saccharomyces yeasts.

Yuyun Lu1, Dejian Huang1,2, Pin-Rou Lee3, Shao-Quan Liu1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chemical compositions of durian wines fermented with Metschnikowia pulcherrima Flavia, Torulaspora delbrueckii Biodiva, Pichia kluyveri FrootZen and Kluyveromyces thermotolerans Concerto were investigated.
RESULTS: Sucrose was not utilized by M. pulcherrima and P. kluyveri, resulting in little formation of ethanol (0.3-0.5%, v/v), while about 7% ethanol was produced by the other two yeasts. Volatiles such as esters and sulfur-containing compounds were synthesized or catabolized and distinctive differences existed among yeasts. Larger amounts of higher alcohols and ethyl esters were detected in wines fermented by T. delbrueckii and K. thermotolerans, whereas M. pulcherrima and P. kluyveri produced more acetate esters such as ethyl acetate (1034.43 and 131.05 mg L(-1) respectively) and isoamyl acetate (0.56 and 27.68 mg L(-1) respectively). Most endogenous sulfur volatiles such as disulfides declined to trace levels, but new ones such as thioesters were formed. Sulfur volatiles in wines fermented by T. delbrueckii accounted for 0.20% relative peak area (RPA), followed by K. thermotolerans (0.23% RPA), P. kluyveri (1.43% RPA) and M. pulcherrima (4.16% RPA).
CONCLUSION: The findings showed that a more complex flavor could result from fermentation with different non-Saccharomyces yeasts and the typical durian odor would still remain.
© 2015 Society of Chemical Industry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  durian wine; fermentation; flavor; non-Saccharomyces; sulfur compounds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25966435     DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.7253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sci Food Agric        ISSN: 0022-5142            Impact factor:   3.638


  6 in total

1.  Selection of non-Saccharomyces yeasts for orange wine fermentation based on their enological traits and volatile compounds formation.

Authors:  Lanlan Hu; Jia Wang; Xueao Ji; Rui Liu; Fusheng Chen; Xiuyan Zhang
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  The Oenological Potential of Hanseniaspora uvarum in Simultaneous and Sequential Co-fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Industrial Wine Production.

Authors:  Mariana Tristezza; Maria Tufariello; Vittorio Capozzi; Giuseppe Spano; Giovanni Mita; Francesco Grieco
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 3.  The Grapevine and Wine Microbiome: Insights from High-Throughput Amplicon Sequencing.

Authors:  Horatio H Morgan; Maret du Toit; Mathabatha E Setati
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  The Possible Reduction Mechanism of Volatile Sulfur Compounds during Durian Wine Fermentation Verified in Modified Buffers.

Authors:  Yuyun Lu; Alicia Sarah Yoke Ling Fong; Jian-Yong Chua; Dejian Huang; Pin-Rou Lee; Shao-Quan Liu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Improving an Industrial Sherry Base Wine by Yeast Enhancement Strategies.

Authors:  Marina Ruiz-Muñoz; Gustavo Cordero-Bueso; Pedro Miguel Izquierdo-Cañas; Adela Mena-Morales; Jesús M Cantoral
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-04-12

6.  Effects of sequential inoculation of Lachancea thermotolerans and Oenococcus oeni on chemical composition of spent coffee grounds hydrolysates.

Authors:  Yunjiao Liu; Xin Yi Chua; Wenjiang Dong; Yuyun Lu; Shao-Quan Liu
Journal:  Curr Res Food Sci       Date:  2022-08-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.