G Li1, F Fu2, H Song1, Y Niu1, Y Su3. 1. 1 Department of Urology, The second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Institute of Urology, Tianjin, China. 2. 2 Department of Radiology, The People's Hospital of Bin Zhou, Bin Zhou, China. 3. 3 Department of Urology, Tianjin Union Medicine Center, Tianjin, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate the radiopathological features of adult metanephric adenoma (MA) and explore whether MA can be differentiated on CT images, including the basis of their morphological features and enhancement patterns. METHODS: 18 consecutive MA cases (age range, 18-66 years; 9 males and 9 females) were pathologically proven and recruited in our study between January 2004 and June 2014. Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT were performed and correlated with corresponding pathological findings to differentiate between MA and other renal tumours. The enhancement pattern, lesion contour and presence of calcifications were evaluated. RESULTS: On unenhanced CT scan, the most common (n = 15, 83.3%) CT imaging characteristics were the presence of homogeneity and well-defined solid renal masses; the minority (n = 3, 16.7%) were heterogeneous or centrally located low-attenuation masses. Contrast-enhanced CT image revealed hypoattenuating heterogeneous masses with varying degrees of contrast enhancement in 16 (88.9%) cases, in contrast to those without increased attenuation in 2 (11.1%) cases. Scattered calcification was found only in one case (5.6%). Pathological results revealed that a total of 6 (33.3%) cases had concomitant malignant carcinoma components; 2 (11.1%) patients had malignant MA; and pure MA was found in 10 cases, with a surprisingly high proportion of malignant tumours. CONCLUSION: The positive-predictive values of "high" enhancement seemed relatively characteristic for the diagnosis of malignant and composite MA. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Radiopathological features of adult MA and exploring whether MA can be differentiated on CT images, including the basis of their morphological features and enhancement patterns.
OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate the radiopathological features of adult metanephric adenoma (MA) and explore whether MA can be differentiated on CT images, including the basis of their morphological features and enhancement patterns. METHODS: 18 consecutive MA cases (age range, 18-66 years; 9 males and 9 females) were pathologically proven and recruited in our study between January 2004 and June 2014. Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT were performed and correlated with corresponding pathological findings to differentiate between MA and other renal tumours. The enhancement pattern, lesion contour and presence of calcifications were evaluated. RESULTS: On unenhanced CT scan, the most common (n = 15, 83.3%) CT imaging characteristics were the presence of homogeneity and well-defined solid renal masses; the minority (n = 3, 16.7%) were heterogeneous or centrally located low-attenuation masses. Contrast-enhanced CT image revealed hypoattenuating heterogeneous masses with varying degrees of contrast enhancement in 16 (88.9%) cases, in contrast to those without increased attenuation in 2 (11.1%) cases. Scattered calcification was found only in one case (5.6%). Pathological results revealed that a total of 6 (33.3%) cases had concomitant malignant carcinoma components; 2 (11.1%) patients had malignant MA; and pure MA was found in 10 cases, with a surprisingly high proportion of malignant tumours. CONCLUSION: The positive-predictive values of "high" enhancement seemed relatively characteristic for the diagnosis of malignant and composite MA. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Radiopathological features of adult MA and exploring whether MA can be differentiated on CT images, including the basis of their morphological features and enhancement patterns.
Authors: Sachit K Verma; Donald G Mitchell; Roberta Yang; Christopher G Roth; Patrick O'Kane; Manisha Verma; Laurence Parker Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-02-16 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Sri J Obulareddy; Junqing Xin; Alexander M Truskinovsky; James K Anderson; Michael J Franklin; Arkadiusz Z Dudek Journal: Rare Tumors Date: 2010-06-30