| Literature DB >> 25965966 |
Derek F Keenan1, Virginia C Resconi1, Thomas J Smyth1, Cristina Botinestean1, Célio Lefranc1, Joseph P Kerry2, Ruth M Hamill3.
Abstract
The effects of fat substitution (≤ 15%) with commercial encapsulated and unencapsulated fish oils on the technological and eating quality of beef burgers over storage [modified atmosphere packs (80% O2:20% CO2); constantly illuminated retail display at 4 °C; for 15 days] were studied using design of experiment (DOE). Burger formulations comprised beef shin (59.5%), salt (0.5%), vitamin E (0.015%) combined with varying levels of beef-fat/fish oils depending on the treatment. Increasing amounts of encapsulated and unencapsulated fish oils in burgers increased polyunsaturated fatty acid content (P < 0.001). Storage decreased (P < 0.001) a* values, which was in agreement with oxymyoglobin data. Vitamin E inclusion in burgers resulted in higher (P < 0.01) oxymyoglobin values. TBARS values increased (P < 0.001) over storage as expected. Fat substitution with unencapsulated oils increased cook loss (P < 0.001) and decreased hardness (P < 0.05) compared to other treatments. Optimisation predicted a burger formulation with 7.8% substitution in beef-fat with encapsulated fish oil. Panellists scored the optimised burger formulation (P < 0.05) lower than controls for overall acceptability.Entities:
Keywords: (Un/encapsulated) fish oil; Beef burger; DOE; Fat substitution; GC–MS; Oxidation; Vitamin E
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25965966 DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.04.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Meat Sci ISSN: 0309-1740 Impact factor: 5.209