Literature DB >> 25965900

Glioblastoma Multiforme Recurrence: An Exploratory Study of (18)F FPPRGD2 PET/CT.

Andrei Iagaru1, Camila Mosci1, Erik Mittra1, Greg Zaharchuk1, Nancy Fischbein1, Griffith Harsh1, Gordon Li1, Seema Nagpal1, Lawrence Recht1, Sanjiv Sam Gambhir1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate fluorine 18 ((18)F) 2-fluoropropionyl-labeled PEGylated dimeric arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) peptide (PEG3-E[c{RGDyk}]2) (FPPRGD2) positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant protocol. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. (18)F FPPRGD2 uptake was measured semiquantitatively in the form of maximum standardized uptake values (SUV(max)) and uptake volumes before and after treatment with bevacizumab. Vital signs and laboratory results were collected before, during, and after the examinations. A nonparametric version of multivariate analysis of variance was used to assess safety outcome measures simultaneously across time points. A paired two-sample t test was performed to compare SUV(max).
RESULTS: A total of 17 participants (eight men, nine women; age range, 25-65 years) were enrolled prospectively. (18)F FPPRGD2 PET/computed tomography (CT), (18)F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT, and brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were performed within 3 weeks, prior to the start of bevacizumab therapy. In eight of the 17 patients (47%), (18)F FPPRGD2 PET/CT was repeated 1 week after the start of bevacizumab therapy; six patients (35%) underwent (18)F FPPRGD2 PET/CT a third time 6 weeks after starting bevacizumab therapy. There were no changes in vital signs, electrocardiographic findings, or laboratory values that qualified as adverse events. One patient (6%) had recurrent GBM identified only on (18)F FPPRGD2 PET images, and subsequent MR images enabled confirmation of recurrence. Of the 17 patients, 14 (82%) had recurrent GBM identified on (18)F FPPRGD2 PET and brain MR images, while (18)F FDG PET enabled identification of recurrence in 13 (76%) patients. Two patients (12%) had no recurrent GBM.
CONCLUSION: (18)F FPPRGD2 is a safe PET radiopharmaceutical that has increased uptake in GBM lesions. Larger cohorts are required to confirm these preliminary findings. © RSNA, 2015

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25965900     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015141550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  26 in total

1.  Inter-heterogeneity and intra-heterogeneity of αvβ3 in non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer patients as revealed by 68Ga-RGD2 PET imaging.

Authors:  Fei Kang; Zhe Wang; Guoquan Li; Shengjun Wang; Daliang Liu; Mingru Zhang; Mingxuan Zhao; Weidong Yang; Jing Wang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  18F-FPPRGD2 PET/CT in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Akira Toriihara; Heying Duan; Holly M Thompson; Sonya Park; Negin Hatami; Lucia Baratto; Alice C Fan; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Targeting VPAC1 Receptors for Imaging Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Sushil K Tripathi; Rhonda Kean; Emily Bongiorno; Douglas C Hooper; Yuan-Yuan Jin; Eric Wickstrom; Peter A McCue; Mathew L Thakur
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  [68Ga]RGD Versus [18F]FDG PET Imaging in Monitoring Treatment Response of a Mouse Model of Human Glioblastoma Tumor with Bevacizumab and/or Temozolomide.

Authors:  Claire Provost; Laura Rozenblum-Beddok; Valérie Nataf; Fatiha Merabtene; Aurélie Prignon; Jean-Noël Talbot
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  (18)F-Alfatide II PET/CT in healthy human volunteers and patients with brain metastases.

Authors:  Chunjing Yu; Donghui Pan; Baoming Mi; Yuping Xu; Lixin Lang; Gang Niu; Min Yang; Weixing Wan; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Neuro-Oncology Practice Clinical Debate: FDG PET to differentiate glioblastoma recurrence from treatment-related changes.

Authors:  Ephraim E Parent; Derek R Johnson; Tyler Gleason; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2021-05-04

7.  Pilot prospective evaluation of (18)F-FPPRGD2 PET/CT in patients with cervical and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ryogo Minamimoto; Amer Karam; Mehran Jamali; Amir Barkhodari; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Oliver Dorigo; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Harnessing the Power of Molecular Imaging for Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Emily B Ehlerding; Weibo Cai
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  RGD PET: From Lesion Detection to Therapy Response Monitoring.

Authors:  Gang Niu; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  [(18)F]FPRGD2 PET/CT imaging of integrin αvβ3 levels in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Nadia Withofs; Philippe Martinive; Jean Vanderick; Noëlla Bletard; Irène Scagnol; Frédéric Mievis; Fabrice Giacomelli; Philippe Coucke; Philippe Delvenne; Didier Cataldo; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.