Literature DB >> 25965892

Who benefits from removing user fees for facility-based delivery services? Evidence on socioeconomic differences from Ghana, Senegal and Sierra Leone.

Britt McKinnon1, Sam Harper2, Jay S Kaufman3.   

Abstract

Coverage of skilled delivery care has been increasing across most low-income countries; however, it remains far from universal and is very unequally distributed according to socioeconomic position. In an effort to increase coverage of skilled delivery care and reduce socioeconomic inequalities, governments of several countries in sub-Saharan Africa have recently adopted policies that remove user fees for facility-based delivery services. There is little rigorous evidence of the impact of these policies and few studies have examined effects on socioeconomic inequalities. This study investigates the impact of recent delivery fee exemption policies in Ghana, Senegal, and Sierra Leone on socioeconomic differences in the use of facility-based delivery services. Using Demographic and Health Survey data from nine sub-Saharan African countries, we evaluated the user fee policy changes using a difference-in-differences approach that accounts for underlying common secular trends and time invariant differences among countries, and allows for differential effects of the policy by socioeconomic position. Removing user fees was consistent with meaningful increases in facility deliveries across all categories of household wealth and maternal education. We found little evidence of differential effects of removing user fees across quartiles of household wealth, with increases of 5.4 facility deliveries per hundred live births (95% CI: 2.1, 8.8) among women in the poorest quartile and 6.8 per hundred live births (95% CI: 4.0, 9.7) for women in the richest quartile. However, our results suggest that educated women benefited more from removing user fees compared to women with no education. For women with at least some secondary education, the estimated effect was 8.6 facility deliveries per hundred live births (95% CI: 5.4, 11.9), but only 4.6 per hundred live births (95% CI: 2.2, 7.0) for women with no education (heterogeneity p-value = 0.04). Thus, while removing fees at the point of service increased facility deliveries across the socioeconomic gradient, it did not reduce inequalities defined by household wealth and may have contributed to a widening of educational inequalities. These findings emphasize the need for concerted efforts to address financial and other barriers that contribute to large and persistent socioeconomic inequalities in delivery care.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Maternal health services; Socioeconomic inequalities; Sub-Saharan Africa; User fee removal

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25965892     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  13 in total

1.  Can Sierra Leone maintain the equitable delivery of their Free Health Care Initiative? The case for more contextualised interventions: results of a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Frédérique Vallières; Emma Louise Cassidy; Eilish McAuliffe; Brynne Gilmore; Allieu S Bangura; Joseph Musa
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  The impact of user fees on health services utilization and infectious disease diagnoses in Neno District, Malawi: a longitudinal, quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  S I Watson; E B Wroe; E L Dunbar; J Mukherjee; S B Squire; L Nazimera; L Dullie; R J Lilford
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  'Rowing against the current': the policy process and effects of removing user fees for caesarean sections in Benin.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Dossou; Jenny A Cresswell; Patrick Makoutodé; Vincent De Brouwere; Sophie Witter; Veronique Filippi; Lydie G Kanhonou; Sourou B Goufodji; Isabelle L Lange; Lionel Lawin; Fabien Affo; Bruno Marchal
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-01-29

4.  Inequality trends in maternal health services for young Ghanaian women with childbirth history between 2003 and 2014.

Authors:  Benedict Oppong Asamoah; Anette Agardh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali?

Authors:  Marion Ravit; Martine Audibert; Valéry Ridde; Myriam De Loenzien; Clémence Schantz; Alexandre Dumont
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2018-06-05

6.  Impact of fee subsidy policy on perinatal health in a low-resource setting: A quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Ivlabèhiré Bertrand Meda; Alexandre Dumont; Seni Kouanda; Valéry Ridde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Out-of-pocket expenditure for home and facility-based delivery among rural women in Zambia: a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jeanette L Kaiser; Kathleen L McGlasson; Peter C Rockers; Rachel M Fong; Thandiwe Ngoma; Davidson H Hamer; Taryn Vian; Godfrey Biemba; Jody R Lori; Nancy A Scott
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2019-08-01

8.  Too poor or too far? Partitioning the variability of hospital-based childbirth by poverty and travel time in Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria and Tanzania.

Authors:  Kerry L M Wong; Oliver J Brady; Oona M R Campbell; Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas; Lenka Benova
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2020-01-28

9.  Analyzing the Financial Sustainability of User Fee Removal Policies: A Rapid First Assessment Methodology with a Practical Application for Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Jacky Mathonnat; Martine Audibert; Salam Belem
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.561

10.  Who benefits from free institutional delivery? evidence from a cross sectional survey of North Central and Southwestern Nigeria.

Authors:  Anthony I Ajayi; Wilson Akpan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.