BACKGROUND: Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have exercise intolerance due to left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, mitral regurgitation, and left ventricular dysfunction. We sought to study predictors of outcomes in HCM patients undergoing cardiopulmonary stress testing (CPT). METHODS: We studied 1,005 HCM patients (50 ± 14 years, 64% men, 77% on β-blockers) who underwent CPT with echocardiography. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise variables (peak oxygen consumption [VO2] and heart rate recovery [HRR] at first minute postexercise) were recorded. End point was a composite of death, appropriate defibrillator discharges, resuscitated sudden death, stroke, and heart failure admission. RESULTS: Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), postexercise LVOT gradient, and peak VO2 were 62% ± 6%, 92 ± 51 mm Hg, and 21 ± 6 mL kg(-1) min(-1), respectively. Despite 789 patients (78%) being in New York Heart Association classes I to II, only 8% achieved >100% age-gender predicted peak VO2, whereas 77% and 15% achieved 50% to 100% and <50%, respectively. Left ventricular outflow tract gradient ≥30 mm Hg was observed in 83% patients, whereas 23% had abnormal HRR. More than 5.5 ± 4 years, there were 94 (9%) events; 511 (50%) patients underwent surgery for LVOT obstruction. Multivariable Cox proportional analysis demonstrated % age-gender predicted peak VO2 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96 [0.93-0.98]), normal vs abnormal HRR (HR 0.48 [0.32-0.73]), higher LVEF (HR 0.96 [0.93-0.98]), surgery (0.53 [0.33-0.83]), and atrial fibrillation (HR 1.65 [1.04-2.60]) were associated with outcomes (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In HCM patients undergoing CPT, a higher % of achieved age-gender predicted VO2 and surgical relief of LVOT obstruction were associated with better outcomes, whereas abnormal HRR, atrial fibrillation, and lower LVEF were associated with worse outcomes.
BACKGROUND:Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have exercise intolerance due to left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, mitral regurgitation, and left ventricular dysfunction. We sought to study predictors of outcomes in HCM patients undergoing cardiopulmonary stress testing (CPT). METHODS: We studied 1,005 HCM patients (50 ± 14 years, 64% men, 77% on β-blockers) who underwent CPT with echocardiography. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise variables (peak oxygen consumption [VO2] and heart rate recovery [HRR] at first minute postexercise) were recorded. End point was a composite of death, appropriate defibrillator discharges, resuscitated sudden death, stroke, and heart failure admission. RESULTS: Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), postexercise LVOT gradient, and peak VO2 were 62% ± 6%, 92 ± 51 mm Hg, and 21 ± 6 mL kg(-1) min(-1), respectively. Despite 789 patients (78%) being in New York Heart Association classes I to II, only 8% achieved >100% age-gender predicted peak VO2, whereas 77% and 15% achieved 50% to 100% and <50%, respectively. Left ventricular outflow tract gradient ≥30 mm Hg was observed in 83% patients, whereas 23% had abnormal HRR. More than 5.5 ± 4 years, there were 94 (9%) events; 511 (50%) patients underwent surgery for LVOT obstruction. Multivariable Cox proportional analysis demonstrated % age-gender predicted peak VO2 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96 [0.93-0.98]), normal vs abnormal HRR (HR 0.48 [0.32-0.73]), higher LVEF (HR 0.96 [0.93-0.98]), surgery (0.53 [0.33-0.83]), and atrial fibrillation (HR 1.65 [1.04-2.60]) were associated with outcomes (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In HCM patients undergoing CPT, a higher % of achieved age-gender predicted VO2 and surgical relief of LVOT obstruction were associated with better outcomes, whereas abnormal HRR, atrial fibrillation, and lower LVEF were associated with worse outcomes.
Authors: Paulo Azevedo; Dharini M. Bhammar; Tony G. Babb; T. Scott Bowen; Klaus K. Witte; Harry B. Rossiter; Julien V. Brugniaux; Ben D. Perry; Ricardo Dantas de Lucas; Tiago Turnes; Jeann L. Sabino-Carvalho; Thiago Ribeiro Lopes; Rodrigo Zacca; Ricardo J. Fernandes; Greg L. McKie; Tom J. Hazell; Lucas Helal; Anderson Donelli da Silveira; Craig Ryan McNulty; Robert Andrew Roberg; Tom E. Nightingale; Abdullah A. Alrashidi; Evgeny Mashkovskiy; Andrei Krassioukov; Pierre Clos; Davy Laroche; Benjamin Pageaux; David C. Poole; Andrew M. Jones; Gustavo Z. Schaun; Diego Santos de Souza; Tatiane de Oliveira Barreto Lopes; Mary Vagula; Li Zuo; Tingyang Zhao Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2018-07-01
Authors: Ahmad Masri; Mohamed Kanj; Maran Thamilarasan; Oussama Wazni; Nicholas G Smedira; Harry M Lever; Milind Y Desai Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2017-02
Authors: Tiffany T S Ye; Qi Zhuang Siah; Benjamin Y Q Tan; Jamie S Y Ho; Nicholas L X Syn; Yao Hao Teo; Yao Neng Teo; James W Yip; Tiong-Cheng Yeo; Weiqin Lin; Raymond C C Wong; Ping Chai; Bernard Chan; Vijay Kumar Sharma; Leonard L L Yeo; Ching-Hui Sia Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2022-10-03 Impact factor: 5.221
Authors: Robert Przybylski; Ilana R Fischer; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Mark E Alexander; Keri M Shafer; Steven D Colan; Christa Miliaresis; Jonathan Rhodes Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Joshua R Smith; Jose R Medina-Inojosa; Veronica Layrisse; Steve R Ommen; Thomas P Olson Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2018-11-18 Impact factor: 4.241