Literature DB >> 25965710

Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics in Evaluation of LIXisenatide in Acute Coronary Syndrome, a long-term cardiovascular end point trial of lixisenatide versus placebo.

Rhonda Bentley-Lewis1, David Aguilar2, Matthew C Riddle3, Brian Claggett4, Rafael Diaz5, Kenneth Dickstein6, Hertzel C Gerstein7, Peter Johnston8, Lars V Køber9, Francesca Lawson8, Eldrin F Lewis4, Aldo P Maggioni10, John J V McMurray11, Lin Ping8, Jeffrey L Probstfield12, Scott D Solomon4, Jean-Claude Tardif13, Yujun Wu8, Marc A Pfeffer4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Furthermore, patients with T2DM and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have a particularly high risk of CV events. The glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, lixisenatide, improves glycemia, but its effects on CV events have not been thoroughly evaluated.
METHODS: ELIXA (www.clinicaltrials.gov no. NCT01147250) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study of lixisenatide in patients with T2DM and a recent ACS event. The primary aim is to evaluate the effects of lixisenatide on CV morbidity and mortality in a population at high CV risk. The primary efficacy end point is a composite of time to CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina. Data are systematically collected for safety outcomes, including hypoglycemia, pancreatitis, and malignancy.
RESULTS: Enrollment began in July 2010 and ended in August 2013; 6,068 patients from 49 countries were randomized. Of these, 69% are men and 75% are white; at baseline, the mean ± SD age was 60.3 ± 9.7 years, body mass index was 30.2 ± 5.7 kg/m(2), and duration of T2DM was 9.3 ± 8.2 years. The qualifying ACS was a myocardial infarction in 83% and unstable angina in 17%. The study will continue until the positive adjudication of the protocol-specified number of primary CV events.
CONCLUSION: ELIXA will be the first trial to report the safety and efficacy of a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist in people with T2DM and high CV event risk.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25965710     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  25 in total

1.  Interpretation of cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2 diabetes needs a multiaxial approach.

Authors:  Odd Erik Johansen
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-08-10

Review 2.  A Plethora of GLP-1 Agonists: Decisions About What to Use and When.

Authors:  Susan L Samson; Alan J Garber
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 3.  SGLT2 inhibitors in the management of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  R P Monica Reddy; Silvio E Inzucchi
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  Cardiometabolic Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonists.

Authors:  Ashish Sarraju; Sun H Kim; Joshua W Knowles
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 5.  Lessons learned from cardiovascular outcome clinical trials with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors.

Authors:  Teresa Vanessa Fiorentino; Giorgio Sesti
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors for people with cardiovascular disease: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Takayoshi Kanie; Atsushi Mizuno; Yoshimitsu Takaoka; Takahiro Suzuki; Daisuke Yoneoka; Yuri Nishikawa; Wilson Wai San Tam; Jakub Morze; Andrzej Rynkiewicz; Yiqiao Xin; Olivia Wu; Rui Providencia; Joey Sw Kwong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-25

7.  Risk Estimates of Imminent Cardiovascular Death and Heart Failure Hospitalization Are Improved Using Serial Natriuretic Peptide Measurements in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Emil Wolsk; Brian Claggett; Rafael Diaz; Kenneth Dickstein; Hertzel C Gerstein; Lars Køber; Eldrin F Lewis; Aldo P Maggioni; John J V McMurray; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Matthew C Riddle; Scott D Solomon; Jean-Claude Tardif; Marc A Pfeffer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 6.106

8.  HbA1c below 7% as the goal of glucose control fails to maximize the cardiovascular benefits: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pin Wang; Rong Huang; Sen Lu; Wenqing Xia; Haixia Sun; Jie Sun; Rongrong Cai; Shaohua Wang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 9.951

Review 9.  Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and heart failure in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.

Authors:  Ling Li; Sheyu Li; Jiali Liu; Ke Deng; Jason W Busse; Per Olav Vandvik; Evelyn Wong; Zahra N Sohani; Malgorzata M Bala; Lorena P Rios; German Malaga; Shanil Ebrahim; Jiantong Shen; Longhao Zhang; Pujing Zhao; Qunfei Chen; Yingqiang Wang; Gordon H Guyatt; Xin Sun
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 10.  Neural effects of gut- and brain-derived glucagon-like peptide-1 and its receptor agonist.

Authors:  Kenichi Katsurada; Toshihiko Yada
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.232

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.