Literature DB >> 25965624

Prognostic impact of established and novel renal function biomarkers in myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: A biomarker substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial.

Georg Fuernau1, Christian Poenisch2, Ingo Eitel3, Daniel Denks2, Suzanne de Waha4, Janine Pöss3, Gunnar H Heine5, Steffen Desch3, Gerhard Schuler2, Volker Adams2, Karl Werdan6, Uwe Zeymer7, Holger Thiele3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In cardiogenic shock (CS) renal dysfunction is an important parameter of inadequate end-organ perfusion and an independent predictor of adverse outcome. Early detection of renal dysfunction is therefore important, and novel biomarkers such as Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL), Kidney Injury Molecule 1 (KIM1) and Cystatin C (CysC) have been suggested. However, in high-risk CS patients their role for assessing renal injury has not yet been investigated in comparison to the most widely used serum creatinine.
METHODS: This predefined substudy included 190 patients of the randomized Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II)-trial. Blood samples were collected directly during primary percutaneous coronary intervention, one day and two days after randomization. The primary endpoint for outcome assessment was 1 year mortality.
RESULTS: Creatinine, NGAL and KIM-1 were significantly higher in non-survivors in comparison to survivors over time in ANOVA (p<0.001; p=0.002 and p=0.04, respectively). In contrast, CysC levels were not associated with the primary endpoint (p=0.15). Receiver operator characteristics revealed that creatinine at any time point had the best predictive value for 1 year mortality. This was also true when comparing creatinine to different equations for glomerular filtration rate. In multivariable Cox-regression analysis creatinine remained the only significant independent predictor of kidney biomarkers of time to death during the first year.
CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of novel biomarkers such as CysC, NGAL and KIM-1 or calculation of glomerular filtration rate provide no additional prognostic information in patients with CS complicating acute myocardial infarction in comparison to creatinine.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute kidney injury; Biomarkers; Cardiogenic shock; Myocardial infarction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25965624     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  11 in total

1.  [Hypoxic hepatitis in cardiogenic shock : Incidence, laboratory detection and prognosis].

Authors:  C Jung; G Fürnau
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  Role of Plasma Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin as a New Biomarker.

Authors:  Ota Hlinomaz
Journal:  J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures)       Date:  2016-02-09

Review 3.  Laboratory Predictors of Prognosis in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Tamilla Muzafarova; Zuzana Motovska
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-05

4.  Biological effects of inhaled hydraulic fracturing sand dust. VI. Cardiovascular effects.

Authors:  Kristine Krajnak; Hong Kan; Kristen A Russ; Walter McKinney; Stacey Waugh; Wen Zheng; Michael L Kashon; Claud Johnson; Jared Cumpston; Jeffrey S Fedan
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Elevation of Preprocedural Systemic Immune Inflammation Level Increases the Risk of Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Following Coronary Angiography: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Authors:  Wenguang Lai; Xiaoli Zhao; Zhidong Huang; Yun Xie; Sijia Yu; Jiabin Tu; Dachuan Guo; Jiaming Xiu; Ziling Mai; Qiang Li; Haozhang Huang; Huanqiang Li; Jun-Yan Xu; Hongyu Lu; Guanzhong Chen; Shiqun Chen; Jin Liu; Yong Liu
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2022-05-13

Review 6.  Predictors of Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Deepak Acharya
Journal:  Cardiol Rev       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.644

7.  Predictors of mortality following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in an unselected, critically ill patient population.

Authors:  István Ferenc Édes; Balázs Tamás Németh; István Hartyánszky; Bálint Szilveszter; Péter Kulyassa; Levente Fazekas; Miklós Pólos; Endre Németh; Dávid Becker; Béla Merkely
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 1.426

8.  Translational proteomics in cardiogenic shock: from benchmark to bedside.

Authors:  Oriol Iborra-Egea; Antoni Bayes-Genis
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 9.  Cardiogenic shock and acute kidney injury: the rule rather than the exception.

Authors:  N Ghionzoli; C Sciaccaluga; G E Mandoli; G Vergaro; F Gentile; F D'Ascenzi; S Mondillo; M Emdin; S Valente; M Cameli
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 10.  A Review of Prognosis Model Associated With Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Jingyue Wang; Botao Shen; Xiaoxing Feng; Zhiyu Zhang; Junqian Liu; Yushi Wang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.