| Literature DB >> 25965545 |
Mario Rodriguez-Dominguez1, Jose Maria Gonzalez-Alba2, Teresa Puerta3, Blanca Menendez4, Ana Maria Sanchez-Diaz5, Rafael Canton1, Jorge del Romero3, Juan Carlos Galan6.
Abstract
The evolution of Chlamydia trachomatis is mainly driven by recombination events. This fact can be fuelled by the coincidence in several European regions of the high prevalence of non-invasive urogenital genotypes and lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) outbreaks. This scenario could modify the local epidemiology and favor the selection of new C. trachomatis variants. Quantifying the prevalence of co-infection could help to predict the potential risk in the selection of new variants with unpredictable results in pathogenesis or transmissibility. In the 2009-2013 period, 287 clinical samples with demonstrated presence of C. trachomatis were selected. They were divided in two groups. The first group was constituted by 137 samples with C. trachomatis of the LGV genotypes, and the second by the remaining 150 samples in which the presence of LGV genotypes was previously excluded. They were analyzed to detect the simultaneous presence of non-LGV genotypes based on pmpH and ompA genes. In the first group, co-infections were detected in 10.9% of the cases whereas in the second group the prevalence was 14.6%, which is the highest percentage ever described among European countries. Moreover, bioinformatic analyses suggested the presence among men who have sex with men of a pmpH-recombinant variant, similar to strains described in Seattle in 2002. This variant was the result of genetic exchange between genotypes belonging to LGV and members of G-genotype. Sequencing of other genes, phylogenetically related to pathotype, confirmed that the putative recombinant found in Madrid could have a common origin with the strains described in Seattle. Countries with a high prevalence of co-infections and high migration flows should enhance surveillance programs in at least their vulnerable population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25965545 PMCID: PMC4428631 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Percentage of co-infections in patients with and without presence of LGV, depending on infection site.
| LGV POSITIVE (15/137) | LGV NEGATIVE (22/150) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOTAL | D | E | >2 nonLGV GENOTYPES | TOTAL | D+E | D+F | E+F | F+G | D+G | >2 nonLGV GENOTYPES | ||
|
|
| 9 (60.0%) | 3 (33.3%) | 1 (11.1%) |
| 7 (31.8%) | 4 (57.1%) | 2 (25.6%) | 1 (0.14%) | |||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| 3 (20.0%) | 3 (100%) | |||||||||
|
| 7 (31.8%) | 2 (25.6%) | 1 (0.14%) | 2 (25.6%) | 1 (0.14%) | 1 (0.14%) | ||||||
|
| 3 (20.0%) | 3 (100%) | 7 (31.8%) | 3 (42.8%) | 2 (25.6%) | 1 (0.14%) |
| |||||
|
| 1 (4.5%) | 1 (100%) | ||||||||||
The 137 patients with simultaneous presence of genotypes related to LGV are described as “LGV positive”. The 150 patients with diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection excluding genotypes belonging to LGV are described as “LGV negative”.
aThe cases included in “LGV positive” group with more than 2 non-invasive urogenital genotypes are: D+E (2 cases), E+F (1 case), E+G (1 case) and D+G (1 case).
bThe case of coinfection caused by more than 2 non-LGV genotypes in the LGV group involved D+G+F genotypes.
Abbreviations:
1MSM: Men who have sex with men.
2HTX: Heterosexual.
Fig 1Maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction (PhyML) identifying recombinant variants based on fragment of pmpH gene.
A) Phylogenetic tree based on complete sequenced fragment of pmpH gene (407 bp). B) Phylogenetic tree based on 236 bp (corresponding to 393–555 and 726–800 nucleotides in pmpH gene) showing identity to urogenital non-invasive genotypes. C) Phylogenetic tree based on 171 bp (corresponding to 555–726 nucleotides in pmpH gene) showing identity to L genotype. The reference strains used in this phylogenetic reconstruction are denominated with the letter which define the genotype. A detailed description of the specific strains used in this tree is shown in Table C in S1 File. In bold we only describe the G-genotypes (G9768, G11074 and G9301) with the highest homology to strains found in Madrid. The colored circles (blue, green and red) correspond to sequences found in Madrid during this work. Green circles correspond to LGV genotypes, blue circles correspond to urogenital non-invasive genotypes (non-LGV) and red circles correspond to putative pmpH-recombinant variant. The evolutionary model used was Hasegawa-Kishino-yano (HKY). Numbers indicate bootstrap values based on 1000 replicates (%).
Fig 2Maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction (PhyML) based on concatenated pmpH-ompA genes.
The strain carrying the putative pmpH-recombinant variant found during this study (in red letters) is closely related to strains belonging to genotype G (bold). The general time reversible plus proportion of invariable sites and gamma distribution model (GTR+ I+G) was used. Numbers indicate bootstrap values based on 1000 replicates (%).
Fig 3Maximum likelihood analysis of concatenated rs2-tarP-incEF-pmpH genes.
Red letters correspond to putative pmpH-recombinant variants described in this study. Bold letters correspond to genotype G strains described in Seattle. The general time reversible plus proportion of invariable sites and gamma distribution model (GTR+ I+G) implemented in PhyML software was used. Numbers indicate bootstrap values based on 1000 replicates (%).
Fig 4Bayesian analysis (BEAST software) of concatenated rs2-tarP-incEF-pmpH genes, using Seattle and Madrid strains belonging to G genotype.
The general time reversible plus proportion of invariable sites (GTR+ I) for rs gene, Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano, plus proportion of invariable sites (HKY+ I) for inc genes and HKY for tarP and pmpH genes. Numbers indicate posterior probability (>0.9).