Literature DB >> 2596543

The influence of decreased retinal illumination on automated perimetric threshold measurements.

D K Heuer1, D R Anderson, W J Feuer, M G Gressel.   

Abstract

Decreased retinal illumination (such as can be caused by pupillary constriction or light absorption by ocular media opacities) was simulated with a randomly ordered series of neutral density filters in front of the right eyes of five subjects with dilated pupils. Threshold measurements were performed on Humphrey and Octopus perimeters at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 degrees nasally along the 180-degree meridian. A 0.6-log unit neutral density filter, which reduces retinal illumination the equivalent of halving the pupillary diameter, decreased the mean Humphrey thresholds by 1.1 +/- 0.8 decibels (dB) (mean +/- standard deviation) and the mean Octopus thresholds by 1.7 +/- 1.4 dB. Statistically significant (P less than or equal to .05, Dunnett's test) threshold depressions were observed at all eccentricities with a 1.5-log unit neutral density filter on the Humphrey perimeter (-4.5 +/- 0.7 dB) and with a 1.0-log unit neutral density filter on the Octopus perimeter (-3.5 +/- 1.0 dB).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2596543     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90855-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  4 in total

1.  The rate of visual field change in the ocular hypertension treatment study.

Authors:  Shaban Demirel; Carlos Gustavo V De Moraes; Stuart K Gardiner; Jeffrey M Liebmann; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Assessing spatial and temporal properties of perimetric stimuli for resistance to clinical variations in retinal illumination.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Mitchell W Dul; Douglas G Horner; Tiffany Liu; Irene Tran
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The influence of stimulus parameters on the visual field indices by automated projection perimetry.

Authors:  M Dengler-Harles; J M Wild; M D Cole; E C O'Neill
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  The value of visual field testing in the era of advanced imaging: clinical and psychophysical perspectives.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Sieu K Khuu; Michael Yapp; Nagi Assaad; Michael P Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.