Alessandro Marcon1, Giang Nguyen2, Marta Rava3, Marco Braggion4, Mario Grassi5, Maria Elisabetta Zanolin6. 1. Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. Electronic address: alessandro.marcon@univr.it. 2. Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. Electronic address: giang.nguyen@univr.it. 3. Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. Electronic address: mrava@cnio.es. 4. Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. Electronic address: marco.braggion@ioveneto.it. 5. Medical and Genomic Statistics Unit, Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. Electronic address: mario.grassi@unipv.it. 6. Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. Electronic address: elisabetta.zanolin@univr.it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In environmental surveys, risk perception may be a source of bias when information on health outcomes is reported using questionnaires. Using the data from a survey carried out in the largest chipboard industrial district in Italy (Viadana, Mantova), we devised a score of health risk perception and described its determinants in an adult population. METHODS: In 2006, 3697 parents of children were administered a questionnaire that included ratings on 7 environmental issues. Items dimensionality was studied by factor analysis. After testing equidistance across response options by homogeneity analysis, a risk perception score was devised by summing up item ratings. RESULTS: Factor analysis identified one latent factor, which we interpreted as health risk perception, that explained 65.4% of the variance of five items retained after scaling. The scale (range 0-10, mean ± SD 9.3 ± 1.9) had a good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.87). Most subjects (80.6%) expressed maximum risk perception (score = 10). Italian mothers showed significantly higher risk perception than foreign fathers. Risk perception was higher for parents of young children, and for older parents with a higher education, than for their counterparts. Actual distance to major roads was not associated with the score, while self-reported intense traffic and frequent air refreshing at home predicted higher risk perception. CONCLUSIONS: When investigating health effects of environmental hazards using questionnaires, care should be taken to reduce the possibility of awareness bias at the stage of study planning and data analysis. Including appropriate items in study questionnaires can be useful to derive a measure of health risk perception, which can help to identify confounding of association estimates by risk perception.
BACKGROUND: In environmental surveys, risk perception may be a source of bias when information on health outcomes is reported using questionnaires. Using the data from a survey carried out in the largest chipboard industrial district in Italy (Viadana, Mantova), we devised a score of health risk perception and described its determinants in an adult population. METHODS: In 2006, 3697 parents of children were administered a questionnaire that included ratings on 7 environmental issues. Items dimensionality was studied by factor analysis. After testing equidistance across response options by homogeneity analysis, a risk perception score was devised by summing up item ratings. RESULTS: Factor analysis identified one latent factor, which we interpreted as health risk perception, that explained 65.4% of the variance of five items retained after scaling. The scale (range 0-10, mean ± SD 9.3 ± 1.9) had a good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.87). Most subjects (80.6%) expressed maximum risk perception (score = 10). Italian mothers showed significantly higher risk perception than foreign fathers. Risk perception was higher for parents of young children, and for older parents with a higher education, than for their counterparts. Actual distance to major roads was not associated with the score, while self-reported intense traffic and frequent air refreshing at home predicted higher risk perception. CONCLUSIONS: When investigating health effects of environmental hazards using questionnaires, care should be taken to reduce the possibility of awareness bias at the stage of study planning and data analysis. Including appropriate items in study questionnaires can be useful to derive a measure of health risk perception, which can help to identify confounding of association estimates by risk perception.
Authors: Floor Borlée; C Joris Yzermans; Floor S M Oostwegel; François Schellevis; Dick Heederik; Lidwien A M Smit Journal: Environ Epidemiol Date: 2019-04-12
Authors: Sophia K Chiu; Jennifer L Hornsby-Myers; Marie A de Perio; John E Snawder; Douglas M Wiegand; Douglas Trout; John Howard Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Shuhei Nomura; Masaharu Tsubokura; Akihiko Ozaki; Michio Murakami; Susan Hodgson; Marta Blangiardo; Yoshitaka Nishikawa; Tomohiro Morita; Tomoyoshi Oikawa Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-04-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Shuhei Nomura; Masaharu Tsubokura; Michio Murakami; Kyoko Ono; Yoshitaka Nishikawa; Tomoyoshi Oikawa Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 3.390