Literature DB >> 25964662

Two-stage biomarker panel study and estimation allowing early termination for futility.

Shanshan Zhao1, Yingye Zheng2, Ross L Prentice2, Ziding Feng3.   

Abstract

Technological advances have yielded a wealth of biomarkers that have the potential to detect chronic diseases such as cancer. However, most biomarkers considered for further validation turn out not to have strong enough performance to be used in clinical practice. Group sequential designs that allow early termination for futility may be cost-effective for biomarker studies based on biobanks of stored specimens. Previous studies proposed a group sequential design for the validation of a single biomarker. In this article, we adapt a 2-stage design to the setting where a panel of candidate biomarkers are under investigation. Conditional estimators of the clinical performance are proposed under an updated risk model that uses all accrued data, and can be computed through resampling procedures. Under a special case where a multivariate binormal distribution applies for biomarkers following a suitable transformation, these estimators have analytical forms, alleviating the computational burden while retaining statistical efficiency. Performance of the proposed 2-stage design and estimators are compared with a traditional fixed-sample design and an existing 2-stage design that allows early termination but does not update the risk model with accrued information. Our proposed design and estimators show an ability to reduce sample size when the biomarker panel is not promising, while controlling rejection rate and gaining efficiency when the panel is promising. We apply the proposed methods to a biomarker panel development for the detection of high-grade prostate cancer in a study conducted within the National Cancer Institute's Early Detection Research Network.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker panel evaluation; Conditional estimate; Groupsequential methods; Two-stage design

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25964662      PMCID: PMC4570581          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxv017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  6 in total

Review 1.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Combining several screening tests: optimality of the risk score.

Authors:  Martin W McIntosh; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Conditional estimation of sensitivity and specificity from a phase 2 biomarker study allowing early termination for futility.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Ziding Feng; Gary Longton; Joseph Koopmeiners
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Early termination of a two-stage study to develop and validate a panel of biomarkers.

Authors:  Joseph S Koopmeiners; Rachel Isaksson Vogel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Conditional estimation after a two-stage diagnostic biomarker study that allows early termination for futility.

Authors:  Joseph S Koopmeiners; Ziding Feng; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Application of the time-dependent ROC curves for prognostic accuracy with multiple biomarkers.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Tianxi Cai; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.571

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Unbiased estimation of biomarker panel performance when combining training and testing data in a group sequential design.

Authors:  Nabihah Tayob; Kim-Anh Do; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Adding Rigor to Biomarker Evaluations-EDRN Experience.

Authors:  Ziding Feng; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.254

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.