Literature DB >> 25964497

Potential Mechanisms Driving Population Variation in Spatial Memory and the Hippocampus in Food-caching Chickadees.

Rebecca Croston1, Carrie L Branch1, Dovid Y Kozlovsky1, Timothy C Roth2, Lara D LaDage3, Cody A Freas4, Vladimir V Pravosudov5.   

Abstract

Harsh environments and severe winters have been hypothesized to favor improvement of the cognitive abilities necessary for successful foraging. Geographic variation in winter climate, then, is likely associated with differences in selection pressures on cognitive ability, which could lead to evolutionary changes in cognition and its neural mechanisms, assuming that variation in these traits is heritable. Here, we focus on two species of food-caching chickadees (genus Poecile), which rely on stored food for survival over winter and require the use of spatial memory to recover their stores. These species also exhibit extensive climate-related population level variation in spatial memory and the hippocampus, including volume, the total number and size of neurons, and adults' rates of neurogenesis. Such variation could be driven by several mechanisms within the context of natural selection, including independent, population-specific selection (local adaptation), environment experience-based plasticity, developmental differences, and/or epigenetic differences. Extensive data on cognition, brain morphology, and behavior in multiple populations of these two species of chickadees along longitudinal, latitudinal, and elevational gradients in winter climate are most consistent with the hypothesis that natural selection drives the evolution of local adaptations associated with spatial memory differences among populations. Conversely, there is little support for the hypotheses that environment-induced plasticity or developmental differences are the main causes of population differences across climatic gradients. Available data on epigenetic modifications of memory ability are also inconsistent with the observed patterns of population variation, with birds living in more stressful and harsher environments having better spatial memory associated with a larger hippocampus and a larger number of hippocampal neurons. Overall, the existing data are most consistent with the hypothesis that highly predictable differences in winter climate drive the evolution and maintenance of differences among populations both in cognition and in the brain via local adaptations, at least in food-caching parids.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25964497     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icv029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  8 in total

1.  What makes specialized food-caching mountain chickadees successful city slickers?

Authors:  Dovid Y Kozlovsky; Emily A Weissgerber; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Great tits who remember more accurately have difficulty forgetting, but variation is not driven by environmental harshness.

Authors:  Ethan Hermer; Ben Murphy; Alexis S Chaine; Julie Morand-Ferron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Using natural travel paths to infer and compare primate cognition in the wild.

Authors:  Karline R L Janmaat; Miguel de Guinea; Julien Collet; Richard W Byrne; Benjamin Robira; Emiel van Loon; Haneul Jang; Dora Biro; Gabriel Ramos-Fernández; Cody Ross; Andrea Presotto; Matthias Allritz; Shauhin Alavi; Sarie Van Belle
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 4.  Neural Substrates of Homing Pigeon Spatial Navigation: Results From Electrophysiology Studies.

Authors:  Gerald E Hough
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-06

Review 5.  Extended spider cognition.

Authors:  Hilton F Japyassú; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Absence of population structure across elevational gradients despite large phenotypic variation in mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli).

Authors:  Carrie L Branch; Joshua P Jahner; Dovid Y Kozlovsky; Thomas L Parchman; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Predation pressure shapes brain anatomy in the wild.

Authors:  Alexander Kotrschal; Amy E Deacon; Anne E Magurran; Niclas Kolm
Journal:  Evol Ecol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.717

Review 8.  An intraspecific appraisal of the social intelligence hypothesis.

Authors:  Benjamin J Ashton; Alex Thornton; Amanda R Ridley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.