Literature DB >> 25964357

Crop rotations in the sea: Increasing returns and reducing risk of collapse in sea cucumber fisheries.

Éva Elizabeth Plagányi1, Timothy Skewes2, Nicole Murphy2, Ricardo Pascual2, Mibu Fischer2.   

Abstract

Rotational harvesting is one of the oldest management strategies applied to terrestrial and marine natural resources, with crop rotations dating back to the time of the Roman Empire. The efficacy of this strategy for sessile marine species is of considerable interest given that these resources are vital to underpin food security and maintain the social and economic wellbeing of small-scale and commercial fishers globally. We modeled the rotational zone strategy applied to the multispecies sea cucumber fishery in Australia's Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and show a substantial reduction in the risk of localized depletion, higher long-term yields, and improved economic performance. We evaluated the performance of rotation cycles of different length and show an improvement in biological and economic performance with increasing time between harvests up to 6 y. As sea cucumber fisheries throughout the world succumb to overexploitation driven by rising demand, there has been an increasing demand for robust assessments of fishery sustainability and a need to address local depletion concerns. Our results provide motivation for increased use of relatively low-information, low-cost, comanagement rotational harvest approaches in coastal and reef systems globally.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Great Barrier Reef; beche-de-mer; pulse fishing; rotational harvest; spatial management

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25964357      PMCID: PMC4450382          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1406689112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

1.  Large-scale expansion of no-take closures within the Great Barrier Reef has not enhanced fishery production.

Authors:  W J Fletcher; R E Kearney; B S Wise; W J Nash
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  Paradigm shifts needed for world fisheries.

Authors:  Juan C Castilla; Omar Defeo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Comparison of outcomes of permanently closed and periodically harvested coral reef reserves.

Authors:  C Y Bartlett; C Manua; J Cinner; S Sutton; R Jimmy; R South; J Nilsson; J Raina
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management.

Authors:  Steven D Gaines; Crow White; Mark H Carr; Stephen R Palumbi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Territorial user rights for fisheries as ancillary instruments for marine coastal conservation in Chile.

Authors:  Stefan Gelcich; Miriam Fernández; Natalio Godoy; Antonio Canepa; Luis Prado; Juan Carlos Castilla
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Integrating indigenous livelihood and lifestyle objectives in managing a natural resource.

Authors:  Éva Elizabeth Plagányi; Ingrid van Putten; Trevor Hutton; Roy A Deng; Darren Dennis; Sean Pascoe; Tim Skewes; Robert A Campbell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The cost of being valuable: predictors of extinction risk in marine invertebrates exploited as luxury seafood.

Authors:  Steven W Purcell; Beth A Polidoro; Jean-François Hamel; Ruth U Gamboa; Annie Mercier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Beyond connectivity: how empirical methods can quantify population persistence to improve marine protected-area design.

Authors:  Scott C Burgess; Kerry J Nickols; Chris D Griesemer; Lewis A K Barnett; Allison G Dedrick; Erin V Satterthwaite; Lauren Yamane; Steven G Morgan; J Wilson White; Louis W Botsford
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.657

9.  Catch rates, composition and fish size from reefs managed with periodically-harvested closures.

Authors:  Philippa Jane Cohen; Timothy J Alexander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Reply to Purcell et al.: Fishers and science agree, rotational harvesting reduces risk and promotes efficiency.

Authors:  Éva Elizabeth Plagányi; Timothy Skewes; Malcolm Haddon; Nicole Murphy; Ricardo Pascual; Mibu Fischer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Rotational harvesting is a risky strategy for vulnerable marine animals.

Authors:  Steven W Purcell; Sven Uthicke; Maria Byrne; Hampus Eriksson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Amid fields of rubble, scars, and lost gear, signs of recovery observed on seamounts on 30- to 40-year time scales.

Authors:  Amy R Baco; E Brendan Roark; Nicole B Morgan
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Ocean resource use: building the coastal blue economy.

Authors:  Narissa Bax; Camilla Novaglio; Kimberley H Maxwell; Koen Meyers; Joy McCann; Sarah Jennings; Stewart Frusher; Elizabeth A Fulton; Melissa Nursey-Bray; Mibu Fischer; Kelli Anderson; Cayne Layton; Gholam Reza Emad; Karen A Alexander; Yannick Rousseau; Zau Lunn; Chris G Carter
Journal:  Rev Fish Biol Fish       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.845

5.  Dependency of Queensland and the Great Barrier Reef's tropical fisheries on reef-associated fish.

Authors:  Christopher J Brown; William Taylor; Colette C C Wabnitz; Rod M Connolly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.