Literature DB >> 25964350

Severity of ocean acidification following the end-Cretaceous asteroid impact.

Toby Tyrrell1, Agostino Merico2, David Ian Armstrong McKay3.   

Abstract

Most paleo-episodes of ocean acidification (OA) were either too slow or too small to be instructive in predicting near-future impacts. The end-Cretaceous event (66 Mya) is intriguing in this regard, both because of its rapid onset and also because many pelagic calcifying species (including 100% of ammonites and more than 90% of calcareous nannoplankton and foraminifera) went extinct at this time. Here we evaluate whether extinction-level OA could feasibly have been produced by the asteroid impact. Carbon cycle box models were used to estimate OA consequences of (i) vaporization of up to 60 × 10(15) mol of sulfur from gypsum rocks at the point of impact; (ii) generation of up to 5 × 10(15) mol of NOx by the impact pressure wave and other sources; (iii) release of up to 6,500 Pg C as CO2 from vaporization of carbonate rocks, wildfires, and soil carbon decay; and (iv) ocean overturn bringing high-CO2 water to the surface. We find that the acidification produced by most processes is too weak to explain calcifier extinctions. Sulfuric acid additions could have made the surface ocean extremely undersaturated (Ωcalcite <0.5), but only if they reached the ocean very rapidly (over a few days) and if the quantity added was at the top end of literature estimates. We therefore conclude that severe ocean acidification might have been, but most likely was not, responsible for the great extinctions of planktonic calcifiers and ammonites at the end of the Cretaceous.

Entities:  

Keywords:  K/Pg boundary; asteroid impact; mass extinction; ocean acidification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25964350      PMCID: PMC4450376          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1418604112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  Evidence that decomposition rates of organic carbon in mineral soil do not vary with temperature.

Authors:  C P Giardina; M G Ryan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Chicxulub and climate: radiative perturbations of impact-produced S-bearing gases.

Authors:  Elisabetta Pierazzo; Andrea N Hahmann; Lisa C Sloan
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Past extreme warming events linked to massive carbon release from thawing permafrost.

Authors:  Robert M DeConto; Simone Galeotti; Mark Pagani; David Tracy; Kevin Schaefer; Tingjun Zhang; David Pollard; David J Beerling
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  End-Cretaceous marine mass extinction not caused by productivity collapse.

Authors:  Laia Alegret; Ellen Thomas; Kyger C Lohmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sudden and Gradual Molluscan Extinctions in the Latest Cretaceous of Western European Tethys

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  The geological record of ocean acidification.

Authors:  Bärbel Hönisch; Andy Ridgwell; Daniela N Schmidt; Ellen Thomas; Samantha J Gibbs; Appy Sluijs; Richard Zeebe; Lee Kump; Rowan C Martindale; Sarah E Greene; Wolfgang Kiessling; Justin Ries; James C Zachos; Dana L Royer; Stephen Barker; Thomas M Marchitto; Ryan Moyer; Carles Pelejero; Patrizia Ziveri; Gavin L Foster; Branwen Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Impact winter and the Cretaceous/Tertiary extinctions: results of a Chicxulub asteroid impact model.

Authors:  K O Pope; K H Baines; A C Ocampo; B A Ivanov
Journal:  Earth Planet Sci Lett       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.255

8.  Impact of anthropogenic atmospheric nitrogen and sulfur deposition on ocean acidification and the inorganic carbon system.

Authors:  Scott C Doney; Natalie Mahowald; Ivan Lima; Richard A Feely; Fred T Mackenzie; Jean-Francois Lamarque; Phil J Rasch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Eocene/Oligocene ocean de-acidification linked to Antarctic glaciation by sea-level fall.

Authors:  Agostino Merico; Toby Tyrrell; Paul A Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Phytoplankton growth after a century of dormancy illuminates past resilience to catastrophic darkness.

Authors:  Sofia Ribeiro; Terje Berge; Nina Lundholm; Thorbjørn J Andersen; Fátima Abrantes; Marianne Ellegaard
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The extraterrestrial impact evidence at the Palaeocene-Eocene boundary and sequence of environmental change on the continental shelf.

Authors:  Morgan F Schaller; Megan K Fung
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Biogeochemical significance of pelagic ecosystem function: an end-Cretaceous case study.

Authors:  Michael J Henehan; Pincelli M Hull; Donald E Penman; James W B Rae; Daniela N Schmidt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Anomalous K-Pg-aged seafloor attributed to impact-induced mid-ocean ridge magmatism.

Authors:  Joseph S Byrnes; Leif Karlstrom
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Rapid ocean acidification and protracted Earth system recovery followed the end-Cretaceous Chicxulub impact.

Authors:  Michael J Henehan; Andy Ridgwell; Ellen Thomas; Shuang Zhang; Laia Alegret; Daniela N Schmidt; James W B Rae; James D Witts; Neil H Landman; Sarah E Greene; Brian T Huber; James R Super; Noah J Planavsky; Pincelli M Hull
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Two-step extinction of Late Cretaceous marine vertebrates in northern Gulf of Mexico prolonged biodiversity loss prior to the Chicxulub impact.

Authors:  Takehito Ikejiri; YueHan Lu; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.