PURPOSE: Patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab require adequate cardiac monitoring. We describe the patterns of cardiac monitoring and evaluate factors associated with adequate monitoring in a large population-based study of older patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients age 66 years or older with full Medicare coverage, diagnosed with stage I to III breast cancer between 2005 and 2009, and treated with adjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy were identified in the SEER-Medicare and the Texas Cancer Registry-Medicare databases. The adequacy of cardiac monitoring was determined. Chemotherapy, trastuzumab use, cardiac monitoring, and comorbidities were identified by using International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes. Prescribing physician characteristics were also evaluated. Analyses included descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic regression models. RESULTS: In all, 2,203 patients were identified; median age was 72 years. Adequate monitoring was identified in only 36.0% of the patients (n = 793). In the multivariable model, factors associated with optimal cardiac monitoring included a more recent year of diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.83; 95% CI, 1.32 to 2.54), anthracycline use (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.71), female prescribing physician (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.70), and physician graduating after 1990 (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.12). The presence of cardiac comorbidities was not a determinant for cardiac monitoring. Of the variance in the adequacy of cardiac monitoring, 15.3% was attributable to physician factors and 5.2% to measured patient factors. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of patients had suboptimal cardiac monitoring. Physician characteristics had more influence than measured patient-level factors in the adequacy of cardiac monitoring. Because trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity is reversible, efforts to improve the adequacy of cardiac monitoring are needed, particularly in vulnerable populations.
PURPOSE:Patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab require adequate cardiac monitoring. We describe the patterns of cardiac monitoring and evaluate factors associated with adequate monitoring in a large population-based study of older patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients age 66 years or older with full Medicare coverage, diagnosed with stage I to III breast cancer between 2005 and 2009, and treated with adjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy were identified in the SEER-Medicare and the Texas Cancer Registry-Medicare databases. The adequacy of cardiac monitoring was determined. Chemotherapy, trastuzumab use, cardiac monitoring, and comorbidities were identified by using International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes. Prescribing physician characteristics were also evaluated. Analyses included descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic regression models. RESULTS: In all, 2,203 patients were identified; median age was 72 years. Adequate monitoring was identified in only 36.0% of the patients (n = 793). In the multivariable model, factors associated with optimal cardiac monitoring included a more recent year of diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.83; 95% CI, 1.32 to 2.54), anthracycline use (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.71), female prescribing physician (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.70), and physician graduating after 1990 (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.12). The presence of cardiac comorbidities was not a determinant for cardiac monitoring. Of the variance in the adequacy of cardiac monitoring, 15.3% was attributable to physician factors and 5.2% to measured patient factors. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of patients had suboptimal cardiac monitoring. Physician characteristics had more influence than measured patient-level factors in the adequacy of cardiac monitoring. Because trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity is reversible, efforts to improve the adequacy of cardiac monitoring are needed, particularly in vulnerable populations.
Authors: Karen E Hoffman; Jiangong Niu; Yu Shen; Jing Jiang; John W Davis; Jeri Kim; Deborah A Kuban; George H Perkins; Jay B Shah; Grace L Smith; Robert J Volk; Thomas A Buchholz; Sharon H Giordano; Benjamin D Smith Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Dennis Slamon; Wolfgang Eiermann; Nicholas Robert; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Miguel Martin; Michael Press; John Mackey; John Glaspy; Arlene Chan; Marek Pawlicki; Tamas Pinter; Vicente Valero; Mei-Ching Liu; Guido Sauter; Gunter von Minckwitz; Frances Visco; Valerie Bee; Marc Buyse; Belguendouz Bendahmane; Isabelle Tabah-Fisch; Mary-Ann Lindsay; Alessandro Riva; John Crown Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-10-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Martine J Piccart-Gebhart; Marion Procter; Brian Leyland-Jones; Aron Goldhirsch; Michael Untch; Ian Smith; Luca Gianni; Jose Baselga; Richard Bell; Christian Jackisch; David Cameron; Mitch Dowsett; Carlos H Barrios; Günther Steger; Chiun-Shen Huang; Michael Andersson; Moshe Inbar; Mikhail Lichinitser; István Láng; Ulrike Nitz; Hiroji Iwata; Christoph Thomssen; Caroline Lohrisch; Thomas M Suter; Josef Rüschoff; Tamás Suto; Victoria Greatorex; Carol Ward; Carolyn Straehle; Eleanor McFadden; M Stella Dolci; Richard D Gelber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-10-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jersey Chen; Jessica B Long; Arti Hurria; Cynthia Owusu; Richard M Steingart; Cary P Gross Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Edward H Romond; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Priya Rastogi; Sandra M Swain; Charles E Geyer; Michael S Ewer; Vikas Rathi; Louis Fehrenbacher; Adam Brufsky; Catherine A Azar; Patrick J Flynn; John L Zapas; Jonathan Polikoff; Howard M Gross; David D Biggs; James N Atkins; Elizabeth Tan-Chiu; Ping Zheng; Greg Yothers; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-09-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Evandro de Azambuja; Marion J Procter; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Dominique Agbor-Tarh; Otto Metzger-Filho; Jutta Steinseifer; Michael Untch; Ian E Smith; Luca Gianni; Jose Baselga; Christian Jackisch; David A Cameron; Richard Bell; Brian Leyland-Jones; Mitch Dowsett; Richard D Gelber; Martine J Piccart-Gebhart; Thomas M Suter Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-06-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A L Jones; M Barlow; P J Barrett-Lee; P A Canney; I M Gilmour; S D Robb; C J Plummer; A M Wardley; M W Verrill Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Chau T Dang; Anthony F Yu; Lee W Jones; Jennifer Liu; Richard M Steingart; Daniel F Argolo; Larry Norton; Clifford A Hudis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christine C Davis; Amelia Zelnak; J William Eley; Daniel A Goldstein; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Trevor McKibbin Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Raymond R Russell; Jonathan Alexander; Diwakar Jain; Indu G Poornima; Ajay V Srivastava; Eugene Storozynsky; Ronald G Schwartz Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 5.952