Literature DB >> 25964062

Dispersal of a defensive symbiont depends on contact between hosts, host health, and host size.

Skylar R Hopkins1, Lindsey J Boyle2, Lisa K Belden3, Jeremy M Wojdak4.   

Abstract

Symbiont dispersal is necessary for the maintenance of defense mutualisms in space and time, and the distribution of symbionts among hosts should be intricately tied to symbiont dispersal behaviors. However, we know surprisingly little about how most defensive symbionts find and choose advantageous hosts or what cues trigger symbionts to disperse from their current hosts. In a series of six experiments, we explored the dispersal ecology of an oligochaete worm (Chaetogaster limnaei) that protects snail hosts from infection by larval trematode parasites. Specifically, we determined the factors that affected net symbiont dispersal from a current "donor" host to a new "receiver" host. Symbionts rarely dispersed unless hosts directly came in contact with one another. However, symbionts overcame their reluctance to disperse across the open environment if the donor host died. When hosts came in direct contact, net symbiont dispersal varied with both host size and trematode infection status, whereas symbiont density did not influence the probability of symbiont dispersal. Together, these experiments show that symbiont dispersal is not a constant, random process, as is often assumed in symbiont dispersal models, but rather the probability of dispersal varies with ecological conditions and among individual hosts. The observed heterogeneity in dispersal rates among hosts may help to explain symbiont aggregation among snail hosts in nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chaetogaster; Helisoma; Protection mutualism; Symbiosis; Transmission

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25964062     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3333-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  28 in total

1.  Risky dispersal: avoiding kin competition despite uncertainty.

Authors:  J Cote; J Clobert
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 2.  Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics.

Authors:  Diana E Bowler; Tim G Benton
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-05

3.  Parasitic mites as part-time bodyguards of a host wasp.

Authors:  Kimiko Okabe; Shun'ichi Makino
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Costs of dispersal.

Authors:  Dries Bonte; Hans Van Dyck; James M Bullock; Aurélie Coulon; Maria Delgado; Melanie Gibbs; Valerie Lehouck; Erik Matthysen; Karin Mustin; Marjo Saastamoinen; Nicolas Schtickzelle; Virginie M Stevens; Sofie Vandewoestijne; Michel Baguette; Kamil Barton; Tim G Benton; Audrey Chaput-Bardy; Jean Clobert; Calvin Dytham; Thomas Hovestadt; Christoph M Meier; Steve C F Palmer; Camille Turlure; Justin M J Travis
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2011-09-19

5.  On benefits of indirect defence: short- and long-term studies of antiherbivore protection via mutualistic ants.

Authors:  Martin Heil; Brigitte Fiala; Ulrich Maschwitz; K Eduard Linsenmair
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Untangling the Ecology, Taxonomy, and Evolution of Chaetogaster limnaei (Oligochaeta: Naididae) Species Complex.

Authors:  Ashleigh B Smythe; Kristin Forgrave; Amanda Patti; Rick Hochberg; Marian K Litvaitis
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.276

7.  Associations between two trematode parasites, an ectosymbiotic annelid, and Thiara (Tarebia) granifera (Gastropoda) in Jamaica.

Authors:  Stacey A McKoy; Eric J Hyslop; Ralph D Robinson
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 1.276

8.  Symbiotic marine bacteria chemically defend crustacean embryos from a pathogenic fungus.

Authors:  M S Gil-Turnes; M E Hay; W Fenical
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-10-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Processes influencing the distribution of parasite numbers within host populations with special emphasis on parasite-induced host mortalities.

Authors:  R M Anderson; D M Gordon
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Parasite predators exhibit a rapid numerical response to increased parasite abundance and reduce transmission to hosts.

Authors:  Skylar R Hopkins; Jennie A Wyderko; Robert R Sheehy; Lisa K Belden; Jeremy M Wojdak
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  3 in total

1.  A symbiont's dispersal strategy: condition-dependent dispersal underlies predictable variation in direct transmission among hosts.

Authors:  James Skelton; Robert P Creed; Bryan L Brown
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Individual differences in boldness influence patterns of social interactions and the transmission of cuticular bacteria among group-mates.

Authors:  Carl N Keiser; Noa Pinter-Wollman; David A Augustine; Michael J Ziemba; Lingran Hao; Jeffrey G Lawrence; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Host preferences inhibit transmission from potential superspreader host species.

Authors:  Skylar R Hopkins; Cari M McGregor; Lisa K Belden; Jeremy M Wojdak
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.