Saleh A Alqahtani1, Nezam Afdhal2, Stefan Zeuzem3, Stuart C Gordon4, Alessandra Mangia5, Paul Kwo6, Michael Fried7, Jenny C Yang8, Xiao Ding8, Phillip S Pang8, John G McHutchison8, David Pound9, K Rajender Reddy10, Patrick Marcellin11, Kris V Kowdley12, Mark Sulkowski1. 1. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD. 2. Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA. 3. Department of Medicine, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. 4. Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI. 5. Department of Hepatology, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy. 6. Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. 7. Liver Center, University of North Carolina Health Care, Chapel Hill, NC. 8. Liver Diseases, Gilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA. 9. Indianapolis Gastroenterology Research Foundation, Indianapolis, IN. 10. Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 11. Department of Hepatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Beaujon, Clichy-sous-Bois, France. 12. Liver Care Network and Organ Care Research, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: In phase III studies, treatment with the once-daily fixed-dose combination tablet of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) with and without ribavirin (RBV) resulted in high rates of sustained virological response (SVR) in patients chronically infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus, including those with compensated cirrhosis. We conducted an analysis of data from these trials to compare the safety and tolerability profile of LDV-SOF with and without RBV. We analyzed treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities in patients who were randomized to 8, 12, and 24 weeks ofLDV/SOF with or without RBV. In total, data from 1,952 patients (of whom 872 received LDV/SOF with RBV and 1,080 receivedLDV/SOF alone) were analyzed. Overall, 308 patients (16%) were African American, 224 (11%) had compensated cirrhosis, 501 (26%) had a body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2) , and 440 (23%) were treatment experienced. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 71% and 45% of patients treated with and without RBV, respectively, including fatigue, insomnia, irritability, and rash/pruritus. Patients receiving RBV with LDV/SOF were more likely to require dose modification, interruptions of treatment resulting from AEs, or require the use of concomitant medications than those receiving LDV/SOF alone. Rates of treatment-related serious AEs and discontinuations resulting from AEs were similarly low (<1%) in both groups. The rate of SVR in those receiving RBV and those not receiving RBV was the same (97%). CONCLUSION:LDV/SOF plus RBV was associated with a greater incidence of AEs as well as concomitant medication use than LDV/SOF alone. Use of RBV did not impact the efficacy of LDV/SOF regimens in the ION phase III studies.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: In phase III studies, treatment with the once-daily fixed-dose combination tablet of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) with and without ribavirin (RBV) resulted in high rates of sustained virological response (SVR) in patients chronically infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus, including those with compensated cirrhosis. We conducted an analysis of data from these trials to compare the safety and tolerability profile of LDV-SOF with and without RBV. We analyzed treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities in patients who were randomized to 8, 12, and 24 weeks of LDV/SOF with or without RBV. In total, data from 1,952 patients (of whom 872 received LDV/SOF with RBV and 1,080 received LDV/SOF alone) were analyzed. Overall, 308 patients (16%) were African American, 224 (11%) had compensated cirrhosis, 501 (26%) had a body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2) , and 440 (23%) were treatment experienced. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 71% and 45% of patients treated with and without RBV, respectively, including fatigue, insomnia, irritability, and rash/pruritus. Patients receiving RBV with LDV/SOF were more likely to require dose modification, interruptions of treatment resulting from AEs, or require the use of concomitant medications than those receiving LDV/SOF alone. Rates of treatment-related serious AEs and discontinuations resulting from AEs were similarly low (<1%) in both groups. The rate of SVR in those receiving RBV and those not receiving RBV was the same (97%). CONCLUSION:LDV/SOF plus RBV was associated with a greater incidence of AEs as well as concomitant medication use than LDV/SOF alone. Use of RBV did not impact the efficacy of LDV/SOF regimens in the ION phase III studies.
Authors: D A Axelrod; M A Schnitzler; T Alhamad; F Gordon; R D Bloom; G P Hess; H Xiao; M Nazzal; D L Segev; V R Dharnidharka; A S Naik; N N Lam; R Ouseph; B L Kasiske; C M Durand; K L Lentine Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Meghan E Sise; Elke Backman; Guillermo A Ortiz; Gregory L Hundemer; Nneka N Ufere; Donald F Chute; Joseph Brancale; Dihua Xu; Jessica Wisocky; Ming V Lin; Arthur Y Kim; Ravi Thadhani; Raymond T Chung Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Curtis Cooper; Susanna Naggie; Michael Saag; Jenny C Yang; Luisa M Stamm; Hadas Dvory-Sobol; LingLing Han; Phillip S Pang; John G McHutchison; Douglas Dieterich; Mark Sulkowski Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-05-25 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Robert M Cannon; Jayme E Locke; Babak J Orandi; Douglas J Anderson; Eric G Davis; Lina Mackelaite; Hitarth Dave; Mary Eng; Christopher M Jones Journal: Transplantation Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 5.385
Authors: Risha Irvin; Boatemaa Ntiri-Reid; Mary Kleinman; Tracy Agee; Jeffrey Hitt; Onyeka Anaedozie; Tolu Arowolo; Hope Cassidy-Stewart; CaSaundra Bush; Lucy E Wilson; Alexander J Millman; Noele P Nelson; Lauren Canary; Sherilyn Brinkley; Juhi Moon; Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia; Mark S Sulkowski; David L Thomas; Michael T Melia Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 3.517