| Literature DB >> 25962879 |
Keren Kang1,2, Emmanuel E Dzakah3,4, Wenmei Li5, Mingquan Xie6, Xiaochun Luo7, Hui Liu8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malaria presents a considerable threat to public health. Histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP 2) is the major protein released into human blood upon infection by Plasmodium falciparum. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity of HRP 2 exon II and the efficacy of novel monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against HRP 2 for Point-of-Care Test (POCT).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25962879 PMCID: PMC4427986 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-015-0429-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Figure 1Geographical distribution of malaria endemic areas in China and Myanmar. 1, Henan Province (n=90); 2, Yunnan Province (n=202); 3, Myanmar (n=224).
Figure 2Western blot analysis of mAbs. Recombinant HRP 2 (0.5 μg) and nature HRP 2 were run on SDS-PAGE. The gel was blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane and probed with 0.5 μg/ml of mAb 1A5 and 1C10. Lane M: molecular marker; Lane 1 and 2: rHRP 2 probed with mAb 1A5 and 1C10, respectively; Lane 3 and 7: Human blood serum probed with mAb 1A5 and 1C10, respectively; Lanes 5 and 6: Plasmodium falciparum cell culture supernatants probed with mAb 1A5 and 1C10, respectively; Lane 4 and 8: pLDH antigen (0.5 μg) probed with mAb 1A5 and 1C10, respectively.
Figure 3POCT lateral immunochromatographic assay. A, a representative of negative control in which only the control line turns red; B, a representative of positive control in which both the control and test lines turn red; C, a representative of sample in which both the control and test lines turn red and indicate that this sample is P. falciparum positive.
mAbs 1A5 and 1C10 double antibody sandwich assay detection of positive reference samples from WHO
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Benin I | A | + |
| Santa Lucia | B(high) | +++ |
| Nigeria XII | B(medium) | ++ |
| FC27/A3 | B(low) | ++ |
| PH1 | C | + |
A, B and C represent different HRP 2 sequences.
“+” indicates weak positive, “+ +” indicates fairly positive and “+ + +” indicates strong positive.
Evaluation of immunochromatographic test in clinical sample screening
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity (95% CI) | 99.39 | 98.72 | 99.07 |
| Specificity (95% CI) | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Positive predictive value (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Negative predictive value (%) | 99.22 | 97.10 | 98.48 |
Comparison of immunochromatographic test strips and microscopic examination of thick blood smear
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| <200 | 16 | 14 | 87.50% |
| 200-1999 | 77 | 76 | 98.70% |
| >2000 | 229 | 229 | 100% |